University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
NCT Number: NCT05081843
This research project will explore the feasibility and acceptability of a web-based media literacy tobacco prevention program. The project will be conducted with 9th graders in two schools in the Pittsburgh area.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me13 year–17 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
Specific Aim 1: To assess 9th grade students' preferences for delivery of the web-based media literacy tobacco prevention program. Investigators will conduct focus groups with 9th grade students in each high school. Students will be shown clips from the program and asked to provide feedback about the preferred frequency and setting for the program.
Specific Aim 2: Investigators will conduct a pilot trial of the intervention via a cluster randomized controlled trial. The control group will receive their usual health education curriculum. The intervention group will receive their usual health education curriculum with the addition of the intervention. All students will be asked to complete a pre-test, a post-test, and two follow-up surveys (approximately 4 and 12 months post-intervention). Feasibility endpoints will include overall program completion, recruitment/attendance rates, and retention rates. Acceptability outcomes will assess student perceptions toward the intervention. A sub-aim will be to conduct focus groups and interviews with students, teachers, and administrators to assess implementation barriers and facilitators.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
AD IT UP was originally developed in 2006 as a classroom-based cigarette prevention program focused on traditional media influences, and was converted to a web-based program in 2011. In 2019, the AD IT UP program was updated substantially to include other forms of tobacco, such as e-cigarettes, and other forms of media, such as social media.
The schools' regular health education curriculum includes classroom lectures, hands on activities and group work.
Time frame: 1 month
Parents will be asked to return an opt out form if they do not want their student to participate. Students will provide assent if they wish to participate. Recruitment will be determined by calculating the percentage of eligible 9th grade students not opted out by their parents that also provide assent.
Time frame: 12 months
Retention will be calculated as the percentage of 9th grade students who completed the baseline survey and also completed the 12 month follow-up survey.
Time frame: post-test immediately following completion of the intervention
Acceptability of the intervention will be assessed with closed-ended and open-ended items on the post-test survey immediately following completion of the intervention.
Students will be asked on a 5-point Likert scale with responses ranging from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree (with a neutral middle) their agreement about the following: "I enjoyed AD IT UP," "I understood AD IT UP," "AD IT UP was easy to use," "I tried my hardest when I was doing AD IT UP," "I think AD IT UP would be helpful to other kids my age," "I would recommend AD IT UP to a friend," and "I agree with AD IT UP's message." An answer of "Strongly Agree" or "Agree" on these items indicates high and moderate acceptability, respectively. Each of these items will be assessed individually, not as an overall scale.
Open-ended items will ask: what the student would change about AD IT UP, what the student liked about AD IT UP, what made AD IT UP fun, and what made AD IT UP not fun.
Time frame: baseline vs. 12 month follow-up
Items used in this analysis:
If one of your best friends offered you a [NTP], would you smoke/use it?
This item was repeated for cigarettes, hookah, e-cigarettes, and cigars/cigarillos.
This item included the a 4-item response scale ranging from Definitely No to Definitely Yes for each of the 4 NTPs.
Susceptibility was considered any response except "Definitely No" and totaled for a possible range of 0 to 4. Answering anything other than "Definitely No" on any item is considered susceptible to using tobacco products. These were totaled for a possible range of 0 to 4, with higher scores representing greater susceptibility.
Time frame: baseline vs. 12 month follow-up
Items to measure attitudes toward tobacco products will be included in all 4 surveys. These items include the following with a 10-item response scale ranging from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree.
E-cigarettes are not as bad for your health as other products. Using tobacco products at parties is fun. (added: Using e-cigarettes at parties is fun) Tobacco products help you deal with problems or stress. Smoking helps people stay thin. People who use e-cigarettes are more fun to be around than people who don't use e-cigarettes.
If someone starts using tobacco products every day, it is very hard for them to stop (reverse coded).
Smoking makes a person look more attractive. It would be very easy for me to get e-cigarettes if I wanted them.
Change in attitudes will be determined by the average increase or decrease in agreement with these items. These items will be assessed individually and as an overall scale (range 0-90, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome).
Time frame: baseline vs. 12 month follow-up
Items to measure normative beliefs about tobacco products will be included in all 4 surveys. These items ask participants their rate how acceptable the following statements are among their friends using a 10-item response scale ranging from Very Acceptable to Very Unacceptable:
It is OK for people your age to smoke cigarettes. It is OK for people your age to use e-cigarettes. It is OK for people your age to use hookahs. It is OK for people your age to smoke cigars or cigarillos. A wealthy person is more likely to use tobacco products than a poor person. A successful person is more likely to use tobacco products than an unsuccessful person.
Changes in normative beliefs will be determined by the average increase or decrease in perceived acceptability of these statements. These items will be assessed individually, as well as an overall scale (range 0-60 with higher scores indicating a worse outcome).
Time frame: baseline vs. 12 month follow-up
Items to measure tobacco-related media literacy will be adapted from the Smoking Media Literacy Scale and included in all 4 surveys. The response scale for these 8 items is a 10-item scale from "Strongly Disagree" to "Strongly Agree."
Changes in media literacy will be determined by the average increase or decrease in agreement with these items. These items will be assessed individually, as well as an overall scale (range 0-80, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome).
University of Pittsburgh
Other
Tobacco Initiation Prevention for Pittsburgh and Rural Area High School Students
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05120466
Adolescent Behavior, Behavior
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03855410
Adolescent Behavior, Alcohol Drinking
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06308081
Adolescent Behavior, Behavior
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07129265
Adolescent Behavior, Behavior
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details