Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00063622

Pioglitazone vs Vitamin E vs Placebo for Treatment of Non-Diabetic Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (PIVENS)

The purpose of this study is to determine if therapy with pioglitazone or vitamin E will lead to an improvement in liver histology in non-diabetic adult patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The purpose of this study is to determine if therapy with pioglitazone or vitamin E will lead to an improvement in liver histology in non-diabetic adult patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

  • Histologic evidence of NASH based on a liver biopsy obtained within 6 months of randomization.
  • Age 18 years or older

Treatment and study plan

pioglitazone

Drug

30 mg daily

Other names: Actos

Vitamin E

Dietary Supplement

800 IU daily

Other names: Nature Made

Matching Placebo

Drug

Daily

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Improvement in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Activity Defined by Change in Standardized Scoring of Liver Biopsies at Baseline and After 96 Weeks of Treatment.

    Time frame: baseline and 96 weeks

    Total nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) activity was assessed on a scale of 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating more severe disease; the components of this measure include steatosis (assessed on a scale of 0 to 3), lobular inflammation (assessed on a scale of 0 to 3), and hepatocellular ballooning (assessed on a scale of 0 to 2). The primary outcome was an improvement in histological findings from baseline to 96 weeks, which required an improvement by 1 or more points in the hepatocellular ballooning score; no increase in the fibrosis score; and either a decrease in the activity score for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease to a score of 3 or less or a decrease in the activity score of at least 2 points, with at least a 1-point decrease in either the lobular inflammation or steatosis score.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Improvement in Steatosis

    Time frame: baseline and 96 weeks

    Steatosis is assessed on a scale of 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe steatosis. This secondary outcome measure is the number of participants that experienced a decrease in steatosis score, which indicates improvement in steatosis.

  2. Number of Participants With Improvement in Lobular Inflammation

    Time frame: baseline and 96 weeks

    Lobular inflammation is assessed on a scale of 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe lobular inflammation. This secondary outcome measure is the number of participants that experienced a decrease in lobular inflammation score, which indicates improvement in lobular inflammation.

  3. Number of Participants With Improvement in Hepatocellular Ballooning

    Time frame: baseline and 96 weeks

    Hepatocellular ballooning is assessed on a scale of 0 to 2 with higher scores indicating more severe hepatocellular ballooning. This secondary outcome measure is the number of participants that experienced a decrease in hepatocellular ballooning score, which indicates improvement in hepatocellular ballooning.

  4. Number of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis

    Time frame: baseline and 96 weeks

    Fibrosis is assessed on a scale of 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating more severe fibrosis. This secondary outcome measure is the number of participants that experienced a decrease in fibrosis score, which indicates improvement in fibrosis.

  5. Number of Participants With Resolution of Definite Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

    Time frame: baseline and 96 weeks

    The criteria for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis was definite or possible steatohepatitis (assessed by a pathologist) with an activity score of 5 or more, or definite steatohepatitis (confirmed by two pathologists) with an activity score of 4. This secondary outcome measure is the number of participants who met this definition at baseline and did not meet this definition after 96 weeks of treatment and thus had a resolution of steatohepatitis.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

Nih

Registry information

Official study title

Clinical Research Network in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: Pioglitazone vs. Vitamin E vs. Placebo for the Treatment of Non-Diabetic Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (PIVENS)

Acronym: PIVENS

Important dates

Study start
2005
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2009
First posted
Jul 3, 2003
Registry last updated
Apr 6, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.