Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06729996

Pioglitazone Versus Empagliflozin for Chronic Pancreatitis/Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis Associated Diabetes Mellitus

The purpose of this study is to evaluate efficacy of pioglitazone (PIO) versus empagliflozin (EMPA) to improve glycemic control in people with Chronic Pancreatitis (CP) or Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis (RAP) associated with Diabetes Mellitus (DM). To evaluate mixed meal response in PIO versus EMPA group to better understand physiology of both therapies in CP-DM.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This trial will test the efficacy of PIO versus EMPA in improving glycemic control in CP-DM. The anticipated enrollment will consist of 40 subjects, age 18-80 years who have been diagnosed with CP or RAP with DM, at two clinical sites in the United States. The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of PIO vs. EMPA to improve glycemic control in people with CP or RAP associated with DM.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18-80 years at the time of enrollment.
  • RAP or CP with DM diagnosed before or after CP diagnosis (Confirmed CP on imaging or RAP based on PROCEED study criteria, and confirmed DM as per ADA criteria or clinically diagnosed with DM and on antihyperglycemic therapy)
  • Able to provide written informed consent and participate in longitudinal follow-up
  • A Stable retinal exam within 1 year prior to enrollment unless new onset diabetes was diagnosed within 6 months prior to study enrollment. If an eye exam within the past year is not available but the most recent exam is stable, a standard of care eye exam needs to be scheduled during the study period.
  • HbA1c level 6.5-10.5% at screening visit.
  • Current ongoing treatment with metformin and/or insulin and other antihyperglycemic medications will be accepted at screening. Patients will be willing to safely withdraw one or more study medication or mealtime insulin under the supervision of the study team by the time of screening. The patients clinical team will be informed promptly. Patients not on any antihyperglycemic medications are also eligible.

a. If on a GLP-1 medication (e.g., semaglutide [Ozempic, Wegovy, Rybelsus], liraglutide, dulaglutide, exenatide, tirzepatide, etc.), the patient must be on a stable dose for at least 3 months prior to enrollment, with stable weight status at the time of enrollment and the GLP-1 dose cannot be escalated during the study period.

  • Willing to perform blood glucose and ketone testing on study provided meters as per study protocol.

Exclusion criteria

  • Inability to take PIO or EMPA due to prior hypersensitivity or allergic reaction or current use of medications with potential for drug-drug interactions (Pioglitazone: Drug information - UpToDate, Empagliflozin: Drug information - UpToDate)
  • Patients on PIO or EMPA at the time of screening
  • Diagnosed with Type 1 Diabetes
  • Pregnancy or lactation in women (positive urine pregnancy test at screening will lead to exclusion)
  • History of bleeding disorders (e.g., Hemophilia A (factor VIII deficiency), hemophilia B (factor IX deficiency), von Willebrand disease, platelet disorders etc)
  • Presence of hepatic impairment, ALT >3 x ULN with no etiology known at the time of enrollment or any evidence of acute/chronic liver disease
  • Ongoing treatment for any malignancy requiring systemic treatment (non-melanoma skin cancers treated in dermatologists' office would be acceptable)
  • Presence of osteoporosis without definitive treatment according to PI discretion.
  • Recent inflammatory illness within the 30 days preceding enrollment (e.g.: URTI, episode of AP, etc)
  • History of heart failure classified by NYHA as Class III or greater
  • History of kidney dysfunction classified by an eGFR of <30 mL/min/min
  • Participation in any clinical trial within 30 days before screening for an approved or non-approved investigational medical product.
  • Active alcohol dependence or chemical dependence including tobacco based on investigator discretion
  • On a ketogenic diet
  • Autoimmune pancreatitis, obstructive pancreatitis, and prior surgery of pancreas (Whipple procedure, total pancreatectomy, and distal pancreatectomy)
  • Any condition which could jeopardize participant safety as per investigator opinion, (hemolytic anemia limiting A1c reliability, any evidence of fluid overload, presence of Congestive heart failure etc).
  • Recent DKA or signs of decompensated diabetes in last 6 months or increased β hydroxybutyrate levels (>0.4 mmol/L) at screening.

Treatment and study plan

Pioglitazone (PIO)

Drug

Subjects will take 30 mg tablet, once daily in the morning, taken with or without food for 12 weeks and after 12 weeks dose will be escalated to 45 mg based on Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels (HbA1c >7.0% at 12 weeks, escalate the dose) once daily in the morning, taken with or without food till 24 weeks.

Empagliflozin (EMPA)

Drug

Subjects will start with 10 mg dose, once daily in the morning, taken with or without food for 12 weeks and after 12 weeks dose will be escalated to 25 mg based on Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels (HbA1c >7.0% at 12 weeks, escalate the dose) once daily in the morning, taken with or without food.

Primary outcomes

  1. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

    Hemoglobin is a protein within red blood cells. As glucose enters the bloodstream, it binds to hemoglobin, or glycates. The more glucose that enters the bloodstream, the higher the amount of glycated hemoglobin. An HbA1C level below 5.7 percent is considered normal. Reported as percentage of glycated hemoglobin

  2. Area under curve (AUC) for glucose

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

    Pre-post study difference in AUC for glucose

  3. AUC for C-peptide

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

    Pre-post study difference in AUC for C-Peptide

  4. AUC for Insulin

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

    Pre-post study difference in AUC for Insulin

  5. AUC for glucagon

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

    Pre-post study difference in AUC for glucagon

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fasting plasma glucose

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

    Pre-post study difference in Fasting plasma glucose

  2. Lean mass

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

    Pre-post study difference in lean mass

  3. Fat mass

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

    Pre-post study difference in fat mass

  4. Visceral fat

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

    Pre-post study difference in visceral fat

  5. Fecal elastase

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

    Pre-post study difference in Fecal elastase (ELISA quantitative test, normal >200 mcg/g)

  6. High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

    Pre-post study difference in Hs-CRP

  7. Total cholesterol, LDL, HDL and Triglyceride

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

    Pre-post study difference in Total cholesterol, LDL, HDL and Triglyceride

  8. β-Hydroxybutyrate

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

    Pre-post study difference in β-Hydroxybutyrate

  9. Body weight

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

    Pre-post study difference in body weight

  10. Blood Pressure

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

    Pre-post study difference in Blood Pressure

  11. Body Mass Index (BMI)

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

    Pre-post study difference in BMI

  12. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - 29 Profile v2.1 (PROMIS-29 Profile v2.1)

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

    The PROMIS-29 Profile assesses following domains:

    • Physical function
    • Pain interference
    • Anxiety
    • Depression
    • Fatigue
    • Sleep disturbance
    • Ability to participate in social roles and activities

    PROMIS-29 is scored using T-scores. Higher T-scores indicate a higher level of the underlying construct.

    Each domain has a set of questions, typically 4 to 6 items, and responses are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (e.g., "Never," "Rarely," "Sometimes," "Often," "Always" or "Not at all," "A little bit," "Somewhat," etc.). The responses are then scored on a T-score scale (with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 in the general population).

    T-scores Interpretation:

    • A T-score of 50 is the average score for the general population.
    • T-scores above 50 indicate better functioning or less severe symptoms.
    • T-scores below 50 indicate worse functioning or more severe symptoms.
  13. Insulin sensitivity

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

    Change in sensitivity from baseline vs 24 weeks (Homeostatic Model Assessment, Matsuda Index)

  14. Beta cell function

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

    Change in Beta cell function from baseline vs 24 weeks using oral disposition index

Other outcomes

  1. Ketosis

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

    Percentage of participants experiencing Ketosis based on meter data

  2. Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA) events

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

    Number of DKA events

  3. Insulin needs

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

    Percentage of participants experiencing requirement for insulin

  4. Chronic pancreatitis exacerbation

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

    Percentage of participants experiencing CP exacerbation

  5. Acute pancreatitis episodes

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

    Percentage of participants experiencing AP episodes

  6. Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

    Percentage of participants experiencing incident exocrine pancreatic insufficiency

  7. Vitamin D

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

    Decrease in vitamin D

  8. Bone fractures

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

    Percentage of participants experiencing bone fractures

  9. Adverse events

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

    Adverse events: Anemia, edema, urinary tract infection, Vaginal yeast infection

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Ravinder Jeet Kaur, M.B.B.S

CONTACT

[email protected]

507-255-1455

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic

Other

Collaborators

  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized, Parallel Group, Dose Escalation Trial of Pioglitazone Versus Empagliflozin for Chronic Pancreatitis/Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis Associated Diabetes Mellitus: The PEP-DM Trial

Acronym: PEP-DM

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Dec 12, 2024
Registry last updated
Apr 3, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.