Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01814397

Pilot Study to Evaluate the Effect of Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy on Pain Threshold in Breast Cancer Patients

Postmenopausal women who have hormone receptor positive breast cancer are typically treated with aromatase inhibitor medications, which substantially decrease the amount of estrogen produced by their bodies. These medications are fairly well tolerated, but can cause aches and pains which can be quite severe in some cases.

People experience pain differently. Estrogen appears to play a role in how we experience pain. Therefore, decreasing estrogen levels may lead to more pain in some women than others. The goal of this study is to evaluate perception of pain in women with breast cancer, and to determine if differences in pain perception lead to more aches and pains in some women treated with aromatase inhibitors.

In this study, we plan to enroll 55 women with breast cancer who are starting treatment with an aromatase inhibitor. Participants will undergo testing to evaluate their perception of pain, and will also complete a set of questionnaires. Testing will be conducted before starting aromatase inhibitor therapy, as well as after 3 and 6 months of therapy. We will investigate whether pre-existing differences in pain perception lead to different amounts of pain during aromatase inhibitor therapy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

21 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Observational

Primary location

University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center

Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female gender
  • Postmenopausal, age 21 or greater
  • Stage 0-III estrogen receptor and/or progesterone receptor positive breast cancer who will be receiving a standard dose of letrozole, anastrozole, or exemestane
  • Performance status 0-2
  • Willing to sign the consent form

Exclusion criteria

  • Average pain >=8/10 over the past 24 hours
  • Peripheral sensory neuropathy grade 2 or higher
  • Personal history of schizophrenia, or suicidal ideation or attempt within the past 2 years
  • Thumbnail abnormalities on either hand that are likely to alter pain perception during testing

Treatment and study plan

Anastrozole

Drug

1 mg orally daily

Other names: Arimidex

Exemestane

Drug

25 mg orally daily

Other names: Aromasin

letrozole

Drug

2.5 mg orally daily

Other names: Femara

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Pain50 Assessed at Baseline, 3 Months and 6 Months

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

    Patients rated the intensity of each pressure sensation using a 0 to 100 numerical rating scale (0 = no pain, 100 = worst pain imaginable). Pain50 was defined as the amount of applied pressure in kilograms per square centimeter that evoked a pain intensity rating of 50 out of 100. Pain50 was assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Change in Pain50 with estrogen depletion was determined.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Conditioned Pain Modulation Assessed at Baseline, 3 Months, and 6 Months

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

    To assess conditioned pain modulation, pressure equivalent to the patient's Pain50 was applied to the non-dominant thumbnail for 30 seconds (test stimulus), and the patient rated the intensity of the pressure on a 0-100 pain scale at 10 second intervals. Ten minutes later pressure (conditioning stimulus) was continuously applied to the dominant thumbnail for 60 seconds at the same Pain50 intensity. After 30 seconds, the test stimulus was again applied to the non-dominant thumbnail for 30 seconds and the patient rated the intensity every 10 seconds. Conditioned pain modulation magnitude was calculated as the difference (second minus first) in the mean of the 3 pain ratings to the test stimulus applied prior to and during the conditioning stimulus. Conditioned pain modulation was assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Change over that time period was assessed. Higher conditioned pain modulation values indicate less efficient conditioned pain modulation.

Other outcomes

  1. Mean Baseline Patient-reported Symptom Measures for Patients Who Were Persistent and Nonpersistent With Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy During the First 6 Months of Treatment

    Time frame: Baseline patient-reported outcomes measures, 6 month persistence with therapy

    Patients completed 4 measures at baseline, before aromatase inhibitor therapy initiation. (1) Depression: Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression, scores 0-60, higher scores reflect more depression. (2) Pain: 7 day Pain Diary, scores 0-10, higher scores reflect more pain. (3) Fatigue: Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, scores 4-20, higher scores reflect more fatigue. (4) Sleep: Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep, scores 0-100, higher scores reflect worse sleep. Persistence with aromatase inhibitor therapy was assessed at the 6 month timepoint. Mean baseline values for each measure were calculated for the cohort that persisted with aromatase inhibitor therapy and the cohort that was non-persistent.

  2. Estradiol Concentration Assessments at Baseline and After 3 Months of Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months

    Estradiol is being assessed using an ultrasensitive gas chromatography tandem mass spectroscopy-based assay. The lower limit of detection of the assay is 0.625 pg/ml. For patients whose serum estradiol concentrations were below the lower limit of detection, the value of 0.625 pg/ml was used to calculate the mean estradiol concentration and standard deviation at both baseline and 3 months.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center

Other

Collaborators

  • Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation

Registry information

Official study title

Prospective Pilot Study to Determine the Effect of Aromatase Inhibitor-induced Estrogen Depletion on Evoked Pain Threshold and Psychosocial Factors in Breast Cancer Patients

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2013
First posted
Mar 19, 2013
Registry last updated
Feb 7, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.