New York University Langone Medical Center
New York, 10016, United States
NCT Number: NCT02746705
This study will test the tolerability and preliminary efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with a cognitive training program, remotely-delivered using a telemedicine protocol in 60 adults with multiple sclerosis (MS). The study will evaluate the efficacy of tDCS to evaluate two of the most debilitating symptoms of MS: cognitive impairment and fatigue.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
New York, 10016, United States
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been demonstrated to:
Cognitive impairment in MS remains a major treatment challenge and a trial of tDCS combined with a cognitive training program to treat MS-related cognitive impairment is warranted. However, one barrier for the study of tDCS has been the need for the participant to travel to the study site for each tDCS administration. To address this issue, the biomedical company Soterix, has recently designed a remote-delivery tDCS device designed for use in clinical trials. Therefore, the primary goal of this study is to establish a protocol for remotely-supervised in-home tDCS delivery for studies with MS participants. Established safety and feasibility of remotely-supervised tDCS delivery will facilitate the next steps of larger controlled trials, in both MS as well as other conditions, to determine efficacy and appropriate real-world use.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
tDCS is a therapeutic development that utilizes low amplitude direct currents to induce changes in cortical excitability. tDCS is expected to produce neuronal polarization of less than one mV (millivolt) 9. tDCS produces relatively diffuse current flow, as demonstrated by imaging studies and computational models
Other names: Soterix 1x1 tDCS mini-CT
During a sham session, the device is programmed to ramp up to the desired intensity (target 2.0 mA) and ramp down for the initial 60 seconds, with no current delivery during the session, and then again at the end of the session. These brief periods of stimulation serve to mimic the effects of a true stimulation session.
Time frame: Four Weeks
80% is equivalent to n=16 of the targeted 20 transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) or sham tDCS sessions.
Time frame: Baseline, Four Weeks
BICAMS comprises two tests, the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) and the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R).
Scoring for SDMT involves summing the number of correct substitutions within the 90 second interval (max = 110. The higher the score, the better).
Visual/spatial memory is assessed in BICAMS using the BVMTR. In this test, six abstract designs are presented for 10 sec. The display is removed from view and patients render the stimuli via pencil on paper manual responses. Each design receives from 0 to 2 points representing accuracy and location. Thus, scores range from 0 to 12 (the higher the score, the better).
The total score range for BICAMS is 0-122. The higher the score, the better.
Time frame: Baseline, 4 Weeks
MFIS consists of 21 statements. The number that best indicates how often fatigue has affected the participant in the manner described during the past 4 weeks is circled. Answer choices include: 0 - never, 1 - rarely, 2 - sometimes, 3 - often, 4 - almost always. The total score ranges from 0 to 84. The higher the number, the more frequently fatigue impacted the participant during the past 4 weeks.
Time frame: Baseline, 4 Week
CBB is a brief, computer-administered cognitive test battery that requires approximately 10 minutes for administration. If the CBB score falls between -10 to +10, it is considered normal. CogState scoring is such that 0 could be considered as performing in the average range for that subtest compared to people of similar age. A negative score means that the performance was lower than average, and a positive score means the performance was higher than average. Higher positive scores (for instance 0.2 becoming 0.5) may indicate slightly better performance and higher negative scores (for instance, -0.4 becoming -0.8) may indicate slightly worsening performance.
NYU Langone Health
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03963375
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
St Louis, Missouri, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02511028
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07175792
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Diepenbeek, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT07726667
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Gaziantep, Gaz, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details