Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03622749

Pilot Study of Neuromodulation for Enhancement of Emotion Regulation in Bipolar Mood Disorders

The investigators are conducting this research study to better understand how individuals with bipolar disorder regulate their emotions, and if the study can use a technique called "transcranial magnetic stimulation" or TMS to help improve emotion regulation for individuals with bipolar disorder.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–55 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging

Charlestown, Massachusetts, 02129, United States

About this study

Emotion dysregulation contributes to the development and maintenance of a wide range of psychopathology, but is especially relevant for individuals with bipolar mood disorders (BD). These individuals experience severe and episodic emotion dysregulation associated with maladaptive functioning, interpersonal problems, decreased work productivity, and suicidal ideation and behavior. To date, both pharmacological and psychosocial treatments fail to normalize emotion dysregulation for many bipolar patients. As a consequence, all too many experience poor outcomes. Thus, there is a significant need for new innovative approaches to target and improve emotion dysregulation in bipolar patients. Non-invasive neuromodulation using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) may provide a viable strategy to help improve emotion dysregulation in bipolar mood disorders. As a first step to test this hypothesis, the current proposal seeks to experimentally identify specific neural target sites for improving emotion regulation using TMS. If the investigators can demonstrate target engagement of emotion regulation at the behavioral level using TMS, this will provide an important first step towards examining the potential utility of TMS as a viable strategy to help improve emotion dysregulation in bipolar mood disorders. While this is not a definitive clinical trial, the sham-controlled double-crossover design of this study will provide valuable information for target site selection for the development of TMS as an intervention strategy to improve emotion dysregulation in BD.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients
  • Men and women
  • Ages 18-50 years
  • Patients diagnosed with bipolar I disorder (BD-I), current mood state euthymic.
  • On a stable psychiatric medication regimen for at least a month prior to and during study participation

Healthy Controls:

  • Men and women
  • Ages 18-50 years
  • Without major psychiatric illness

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients
  • Any change in psychiatric medications within a month prior to and during study participation
  • Legal or mental incompetency
  • Intellectual disability
  • Current manic (YMRS > 12) or severe depressive episode (HAM-D-17 > 5)
  • Substance use disorder (abuse or dependence) with active use within the last 3 months
  • Significant medical or neurological illness
  • Prior neurosurgical procedure
  • History of seizures
  • History of ECT treatment or clinical TMS within the past three months
  • Implanted cardiac pacemakers
  • Patients who have conductive, ferromagnetic or other magnetic-sensitive metals implanted in their head or neck, or are non-removable and within 30 cm of the treatment coil. These include:
  • Aneurysm clips or coils
  • Carotid or cerebral stents
  • Metallic devices implanted in the head (e.g. Implanted pacemaker, medication pump, vagal stimulator, deep brain stimulator, TENS unit, or ventriculo-peritoneal shunt)
  • Magnetically active dental implants
  • Cochlear/otologic implants
  • CSF shunts
  • Ferromagnetic ocular implants
  • Pellets, bullets, fragments less than 30 cm from the coil
  • Facial tattoos with metallic ink, permanent makeup less than 30 cm from the coil
  • Pregnant women

Healthy Controls:

  • History of major psychiatric illness, including psychosis
  • Has a first-degree relative with psychosis
  • Active use of neuropsychoactive medications
  • Legal or mental incompetency
  • Intellectual disability
  • Substance use disorder (abuse or dependence) with active use within the last 3 months
  • Significant medical or neurological illness
  • Prior neurosurgical procedure
  • History of seizures
  • History of ECT treatment or clinical TMS within the past three months
  • Implanted cardiac pacemakers
  • Individuals who have conductive, ferromagnetic or other magnetic-sensitive metals implanted in their head or neck, or are non-removable and within 30 cm of the treatment coil. These include:
  • Aneurysm clips or coils
  • Carotid or cerebral stents
  • Metallic devices implanted in the head (e.g. Implanted pacemaker, medication pump, vagal stimulator, deep brain stimulator, TENS unit, or ventriculo-peritoneal shunt)
  • Magnetically active dental implants
  • Cochlear/otologic implants
  • CSF shunts
  • Ferromagnetic ocular implants
  • Pellets, bullets, fragments less than 30 cm from the coil
  • Facial tattoos with metallic ink, permanent makeup less than 30 cm from the coil
  • Pregnant women

Treatment and study plan

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)

Device

Non-Invasive neuromodulation

Primary outcomes

  1. Affective Multisource Interference Task - Reaction Time During Negative Interference Trials

    Time frame: Task administered 10 minutes pre TMS and 5 minutes post TMS

    The Affective Multisource Interference Task is a behavioral task measuring the ability to identify an oddball number when overlayed on affective images as a proxy for emotion regulation. Outcome Measure 1: Slope of reaction time during trials with negative valenced stimuli where the oddball number is other than zero and in a location incongruent with the location on the button box

  2. Affective Multisource Interference Task - Reaction Time During Positive Interference Trials

    Time frame: Task administered 10 minutes pre TMS and 5 minutes post TMS

    The Affective Multisource Interference Task is a behavioral task measuring the ability to identify an oddball number when overlayed on affective images as a proxy for emotion regulation. Outcome Measure 2: Slope of reaction time during trials with positive valenced stimuli where the oddball number is other than zero and in a location incongruent with the location on the button box

  3. Emotion Conflict Resolution Task - Incongruent Fear Trials Reaction Time

    Time frame: Task administered 10 minutes pre TMS and 5 minutes post TMS

    The Emotion Conflict Resolution Task is a behavioral task requiring correct identification of an emotion word overlayed on photographs of facial expressions of emotion. Outcome measure 3: Slope of reaction time during trials when the image is of a fearful facial expression but the word is "Happy" (incongruent)

  4. Emotion Conflict Resolution Task - Incongruent Happy Trials Reaction Time

    Time frame: Task administered 10 minutes pre TMS and 5 minutes post TMS

    The Emotion Conflict Resolution Task is a behavioral task requiring correct identification of an emotion word overlayed on photographs of facial expressions of emotion. Outcome measure 4: Slope of reaction time during trials when the image is of a happy facial expression but the word is "Fear" (incongruent)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts General Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2025
First posted
Aug 9, 2018
Registry last updated
Mar 3, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.