Manual turn
OtherManual turn from side to back to side every 2 hours by nurses while patient receiving mechanical ventilation
Other names: Lateral rotation
NCT Number: NCT00542321
Intensive care unit (ICU) patients on respirators are at high risk for preventable pulmonary complications (PPC). Turning these patients from side to side may reduce PPC, but carries the burden of decreases in blood pressure and oxygenation. The investigators hypothesize that there will be no difference in PPC or adverse events when ICU patients on respirators are turned by nurses or by an automated turning bed.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
The purpose of this pilot study is to test the feasibility of two turning protocols and study procedures for a multi-site randomized clinical trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of horizontal positioning interventions to reduce pulmonary complications in mechanically ventilated critically ill adult patients. The hypothesis of the randomized controlled trial (RCT) is no difference in pulmonary complications between manual, 2-hourly lateral rotation to > 45 degrees (control), and continuous automated turning to 45 degrees (experimental) groups.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Manual turn from side to back to side every 2 hours by nurses while patient receiving mechanical ventilation
Other names: Lateral rotation
Continuous, automated turning to a maximum of 45 degrees in the lateral positions while the patient is receiving mechanical ventilation
Other names: CLRT (continuous lateral rotation therapy), KT (kinetic therapy)
Time frame: Participants were followed for the duration of ICU stay, an average of 10 days.
Number of participants who did not have preventable pulmonary complications (PPC) on pre-study chest radiograph (CXR) and developed PPC during the study period. Pearson Chi-Square test used to test significance of difference between turning groups.
Time frame: Participants were followed for the duration of mechanical ventilation, an average of 5.5 days.
Days on mechanical ventilation, from initiation to withdrawal of mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Participants were followed for the duration of ICU stay, an average of 10 days.
Time in days from study ICU admission to study ICU discharge or death
Time frame: Participants were followed for the duration of ICU stay, an average of 10 days.
Death from any reason between admission and discharge from study ICU
Time frame: Participants were followed for the duration of time on protocol, an average of 3.5 days.
Non-serious adverse events that occurred during the time of rotation in the kinetic therapy bed group and during lateral rotation to right or left position in the manual turn group
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Other
Multi-site Randomized Clinical Trial of Horizontal Positioning to Prevent and Treat Pulmonary Complications in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00447109
Closed System Suction Catheter, Cross Infection
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT07671755
Clinical Response, Cross Infection
Karachi, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT07482007
Cross Infection, Disease Attributes
Tanta, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT04276480
Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Bayonne, France
View Trial Details