Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05049291

Pilot Study of an Advance Care Planning Intervention Among Persons With Dementia

Advance care planning allows people to have their wishes taken into account even in the advanced stages of the persons' condition and at the end of life when the person may be unable to communicate. However, a recent review found an absence of high-quality guidelines for advanced care planning in dementia care. Since few evidence-based resources exist, the investigators propose a study to generate, refine, and pilot test an education information sheet designed to promote advanced care planning among families of persons with dementia.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States

About this study

To determine the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of an education information sheet to promote advance care planning among family members of persons with advanced dementia in long-term services and support facilities.

Introducing an education information sheet containing prognosis and outcomes will be feasible, acceptable, and increase self-efficacy and do-not-hospitalize decision preferences among family members of persons with advanced dementia.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Family member of a person with a diagnosis of dementia (any type)
  • English-speaking family member
  • Family member of a person with dementia admitted to a nursing home

Exclusion criteria

  • Inability to understand/read English
  • Advance directive already in patient chart

Treatment and study plan

telehealth advance care planning

Behavioral

An education information sheet containing prognosis and outcomes of acute care and intensive treatments

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of Information Sheet among Study Population

    Time frame: 6 months

    Feasibility of the information sheet is defined as the consent rate of family members who are offered enrollment. This will be calculatd as a percent of family members (number of enrolled participants/number of eligible participants offered enrollment)

  2. Acceptibility of Decision Aid Tool

    Time frame: 6 months

    Acceptability using an adapted tool (https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/eval_accept.html) which measures the ratings of comprehensibility of the information sheet among participants in the intervention group. Responses are reported descriptively in terms of proportions responding positively or negatively on each criteria.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Decision Self-efficacy Scale

    Time frame: 6 months

    Measures self-confidence or belief in one's abilities in decision making, including shared decision making. Eleven responses are measured on a 0-4 likert scale and a final summed scale is converted to a 0-100 range (scores are summed, divided by 11, then multiplied by 25). A score of zero means low self efficacy and score of 100 means extremely high self efficacy.

  2. Family Member Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale

    Time frame: 6 months

    Measures family member self-efficacy in medical decision-making on behalf of a loved one. This scale has two versions, one for conscious and one for unconscious loved ones, which we will use accordingly. Thirteen items are measured on a 0-5 Likert scale with 1 being "cannot do at all" and 5 being "certain I can do." Higher scores indicate higher decision making self-efficacy.

  3. Adaptation of Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey

    Time frame: 6 months

    Questions adapted from an 82-item questionnaire that measures advance care planning engagement in terms of knowledge, contemplation, self-efficacy and readiness. We include 10 questions from the measure. We used a mean imputation approach. All available data were included to create an average 5-point Likert score.

  4. Preparation for Decision-Making Scale

    Time frame: 6 months

    Measures perception of the usefulness of a decision support tool in preparing respondent for decision-making. Responses are on a Likert scale of 1-5 with one being "not at all" and five being " a great deal." Items are summed for scoring. A higher score indicates a higher level of perceived helpfulness in preparing for decision-making.

  5. Adaptation of Advance Care Planning Engagement for Surrogates Survey

    Time frame: 6 months

    We adapted 9 items from the 17-item Advance Care Planning for Surrogates survey. Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale. We will calculate a summary score, with higher scores indicates a higher level of engagement.

  6. Knowledge about Dementia

    Time frame: 6 months

    Six questions to assess family members' knowledge about dementia were developed for this pilot study. All questions are true/false. Each correct answer will be coded as 1, each incorrect answer will be scored as 0. Higher scores indicate more knowledge.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Oregon Health and Science University

Other

Collaborators

  • University of Pennsylvania

Registry information

Official study title

Pilot Study of an Advance Care Planning Intervention Among Persons With Dementia in Long-term Services and Support Facilities

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Sep 20, 2021
Registry last updated
Aug 21, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.