University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
NCT Number: NCT05049291
Advance care planning allows people to have their wishes taken into account even in the advanced stages of the persons' condition and at the end of life when the person may be unable to communicate. However, a recent review found an absence of high-quality guidelines for advanced care planning in dementia care. Since few evidence-based resources exist, the investigators propose a study to generate, refine, and pilot test an education information sheet designed to promote advanced care planning among families of persons with dementia.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
To determine the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of an education information sheet to promote advance care planning among family members of persons with advanced dementia in long-term services and support facilities.
Introducing an education information sheet containing prognosis and outcomes will be feasible, acceptable, and increase self-efficacy and do-not-hospitalize decision preferences among family members of persons with advanced dementia.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
An education information sheet containing prognosis and outcomes of acute care and intensive treatments
Time frame: 6 months
Feasibility of the information sheet is defined as the consent rate of family members who are offered enrollment. This will be calculatd as a percent of family members (number of enrolled participants/number of eligible participants offered enrollment)
Time frame: 6 months
Acceptability using an adapted tool (https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/eval_accept.html) which measures the ratings of comprehensibility of the information sheet among participants in the intervention group. Responses are reported descriptively in terms of proportions responding positively or negatively on each criteria.
Time frame: 6 months
Measures self-confidence or belief in one's abilities in decision making, including shared decision making. Eleven responses are measured on a 0-4 likert scale and a final summed scale is converted to a 0-100 range (scores are summed, divided by 11, then multiplied by 25). A score of zero means low self efficacy and score of 100 means extremely high self efficacy.
Time frame: 6 months
Measures family member self-efficacy in medical decision-making on behalf of a loved one. This scale has two versions, one for conscious and one for unconscious loved ones, which we will use accordingly. Thirteen items are measured on a 0-5 Likert scale with 1 being "cannot do at all" and 5 being "certain I can do." Higher scores indicate higher decision making self-efficacy.
Time frame: 6 months
Questions adapted from an 82-item questionnaire that measures advance care planning engagement in terms of knowledge, contemplation, self-efficacy and readiness. We include 10 questions from the measure. We used a mean imputation approach. All available data were included to create an average 5-point Likert score.
Time frame: 6 months
Measures perception of the usefulness of a decision support tool in preparing respondent for decision-making. Responses are on a Likert scale of 1-5 with one being "not at all" and five being " a great deal." Items are summed for scoring. A higher score indicates a higher level of perceived helpfulness in preparing for decision-making.
Time frame: 6 months
We adapted 9 items from the 17-item Advance Care Planning for Surrogates survey. Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale. We will calculate a summary score, with higher scores indicates a higher level of engagement.
Time frame: 6 months
Six questions to assess family members' knowledge about dementia were developed for this pilot study. All questions are true/false. Each correct answer will be coded as 1, each incorrect answer will be scored as 0. Higher scores indicate more knowledge.
Oregon Health and Science University
Other
Pilot Study of an Advance Care Planning Intervention Among Persons With Dementia in Long-term Services and Support Facilities
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06509373
Advanced Care Planning, Brain Diseases
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04171895
Advanced Care Planning, Brain Diseases
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04660422
Advance Directives, Advanced Care Planning
New Hyde Park, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06238063
Advanced Care Planning
Hong Kong
View Trial Details