GHMG
Grenoble, France
NCT Number: NCT04372654
During percutaneous cardiovascular intervention, temporary cardiac stimulation may be required. Usually this stimulation is generated via a temporary pacing catheter. In order to reduce the complexity of the procedure, a new stimulation strategy has been developed: the "Direct Wire Pacing technique".In this approach, the cardiac stimulation is provided via the guidewire connected to an external pacemaker.
Previous study demonstrated the superiority of the new technique compared to the former. However this technique is likely to generate electrical pain, risk of bleeding for the patient and risk of blood exposure accident for the operators. This is why the medical device ELECTRODUCER SLEEVE has been developed. This device integrates a pacing function to the introducer and the guidewire used. The "Direct Wire Pacing technique" is simplified, secured and more reproducible.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–99 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Grenoble, France
During percutaneous cardiovascular interventions such as Transcatheter Heart Valve or coronary intervention, temporary cardiac stimulation may be required. Usually this stimulation is generated via a temporary pacing catheter in the right ventricle. This procedure requires an additional venous access and the insertion of the stimulation catheter, which are both likely to generate complications. In order to reduce the complexity and increase the safety of the procedure, a new stimulation strategy has been developed: the "Direct Wire Pacing technique". In this approach, the specific venous access and the implantation of a stimulation catheter are avoided. The cardiac stimulation is provided via the guidewire inserted into the left ventricle or into the coronary arteries. This guidewire is connected to an external Pacemaker using an alligator clamp (Cathode). The Pacemaker anode is also connected using a clamp attached to a needle piercing the subcutaneous tissue, obtaining a closed electrical circuit. This technique was validated during previous studies in the TAVI context through two registries and one randomized controlled trial. This study demonstrated the superiority of the new technique by showing a reduction of the procedural duration, radiation exposure and costs; with similar efficacy and safety. However the subcutaneous needle insertion is likely to generate electrical pain, risk of bleeding for the patient and risk of blood exposure accident for the operators. This subcutaneous anode increases the stimulation threshold (mA) which can cause stimulation failures. Moreover, several technical difficulties preclude general adoption by the scientific community. This is why the medical device ELECTRODUCER SLEEVE has been developed. This device integrates a pacing function to the introducer and the guidewire used during percutaneous cardiovascular interventions. The guidewire then behaves like an intra-cardiac cathode. Thanks to the device, the complex manipulation of needles and clamps during the intervention are avoided as well as pole inversions. The "Direct Wire Pacing technique" used during the coronary and structural interventions is thus simplified, secured and more reproducible.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The device's safety will be assessed at the radial and femoral puncture site
Time frame: during intervention
The device safety is assessed through the occurrence of bleeding complications at the access site where the ELECTRODUCER SLEEVE was used, including: Hematoma formation (EASY Classification) and Access-site Bleeding (BARC classification).
Time frame: at discharge and 1 month
RAO evaluated by a radial artery Doppler and by a reverse Allen test
Time frame: at discharge and 1 month
Outcome evaluated through the clinical examination of the puncture site.
Time frame: during intervention
Outcome evaluated through the capture in the surface electrocardiogram : each spike delivered on the guidewire is follow by its hemodynamic effect.
Time frame: during intervention
Performance evaluated through the stimulation threshold (mA) measured with the external pacemaker
Time frame: during intervention
Procedure duration is defined between the first vascular puncture and the last introducer removal and compared to the EASY TAVI study data
Time frame: during intervention
Confort evaluated using the "Echelle Visuelle Analogique de la douleur" from 0 to 10: 0 being the absence of pain and 10 being unbearable pain.
Time frame: during intervention
Outcome evaluated by a satisfaction questionnaire developed by Electroducer, composed of four questions and a free comment section.
Electroducer
Industry
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01681095
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02579655
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT04580017
Angina Pectoris, Angina, Unstable
Hammam Sousse, Sousse Governorate, Tunisia
View Trial DetailsNCT00248352
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
View Trial Details