Philip C. Bosch, MD
Escondido, California, 92025, United States
NCT Number: NCT02497976
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Trial of Certolizumab Pegol in Women with Refractory Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
Female
Interventional
Phase 3
Escondido, California, 92025, United States
Interstitial cystitis (IC) is a chronic disabling bladder syndrome characterized by urinary frequency, nocturia, urinary urgency, and pain or discomfort with bladder filling. There is no cure for IC and the treatment options are suboptimal. Patients with IC report significant negative effects on their physical and mental quality of life. The etiology of IC is unknown. Certain aspects of IC suggest that autoimmunity may play a role in initiating or sustaining the chronic inflammatory response. Bladder biopsies of patients with IC demonstrate an increase number of mast cells. Mast cell activation with the release of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) may mediate this bladder inflammation. Cimzia (certolizumab pegol) is a medication that blocks the effect of TNF. Cimzia (certolizumab pegol) is FDA approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and Crohn's disease. These diseases are similar to IC. In this study, the hypothesis being tested is that Cimzia (certolizumab pegol) will show efficacy in improving the symptoms of patients with IC.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
400 mg
Other names: Cimzia
Normal saline
Other names: Normal saline
Time frame: Week 2
Patient-reported global response assessment (GRA) such as "Compared to when you began this trial, how would you rate your IC symptoms now?" Study subjects reported their response to treatment of their pain, urgency, and overall status compared to their condition at trial start with a symmetric scale global response assessment (GRA) 28 at weeks 2, 4, 10, and 18. Possible responses were markedly worse (100% worse), moderately worse (50% worse), slightly worse (25% worse), no change (0% improvement), slightly improved (25% improvement), moderately improved (50% improvement), and markedly improved (100% improved). Treatment responders were defined by rating the GRA as moderately improved or markedly improved.
Time frame: Week 4, 10, 18
Patient-reported global response assessment (GRA) such as "Compared to when you began this trial, how would you rate your IC symptoms now?" Study subjects reported their response to treatment of their pain, urgency, and overall status compared to their condition at trial start with a symmetric scale global response assessment (GRA) 28 at weeks 2, 4, 10, and 18. Possible responses were markedly worse (100% worse), moderately worse (50% worse), slightly worse (25% worse), no change (0% improvement), slightly improved (25% improvement), moderately improved (50% improvement), and markedly improved (100% improved). Treatment responders were defined by rating the GRA as moderately improved or markedly improved.
Time frame: Value at Weeks 2, 4, 10 and 18 minus Baseline
The Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index is one of the two O'Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Symptom and Problem Indexes. This scale has a 0 if the patient has no symptoms and a maximum of 19 with severe symptoms. Lubeck et al. validated ICSI as a valid measure of change in treatment outcome studies. A change of -4.03 in the ICSI score was the same as a 2 point improvement in GRA. Propert et al. validated the ICSI as responsive to change in IC/BPS symptoms and was recommended as secondary endpoints in clinical trials. A change of -2.4 in the ICSI score was the same as a 2 point improvement in GRA.
Time frame: Value of Weeks 2, 4, 10, and 18 minus baseline
The Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index (ICPI) is one of the two O'Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Symptom and Problem Indexes. This scale has a 0 if the patient has no symptoms and a maximum of 16 with severe symptoms.
Time frame: Value at Weeks 2, 4, 10, and 18 minus baseline
an 11-point pain intensity numerical rating scale. Subjects rated their average pain, pressure, or discomfort associated with their bladder using an 11-point pain intensity numerical rating scale of 0-no pain to 10-worse ever pain at baseline, and at weeks 2, 4, 10, and 18. Meaningful, clinically important pain relief is a reduction in pain of approximately 30% from baseline.
Time frame: Value of Weeks 2, 4, 10, and 18 minus baseline
Subjects rated their average urinary urgency or need to urinate using an 11-point numerical rating scale of 0-no urgency to 10-worse ever urgency
ICStudy, LLC
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01613586
Cystitis, Cystitis, Interstitial
Antwerp, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT05260112
Cystitis, Cystitis, Interstitial
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04275297
Bladder Pain Syndrome, Bronchial Diseases
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02214550
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Evanston, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details