Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07176559

Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial of Informational Support Versus Spiritual Care

The purpose of this study is to address the need for effective spiritual care support for patients with lung and gastrointestinal cancer. This study will examine how spiritual care affects spiritual wellbeing, anxiety, depression, satisfaction with spiritual care, and quality of communication.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

IU Health Joe and Shelly Schwarz Cancer Center, Carmel, Indiana, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This study is an individually randomized trial of chaplain-led intervention utilizing the Spiritual Care Assessment and Intervention (SCAI) framework compared to an attention control comparator. The chaplain intervention will consist of 4 spiritual care visits with a board-certified or board-eligible chaplain once a week for approximately 4 weeks. The attention control comparator will consist of 4 informational support visits with a trained social worker once a week for approximately 4 weeks.

Participants will be randomized 1:1 to the chaplain-led intervention or the attention control comparator.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥ 18 years old at the time of informed consent
  • Ability to provide informed consent and HIPAA authorization
  • Subject is at least 2 weeks post-diagnosis of an incurable and advanced stage (IV) lung or gastrointestinal (GI) malignancy and receiving cancer care at IU Simon Cancer Center, other IU Health Oncology Clinics, or Eskenazi Health Oncology Clinics
  • Subject has a reliable phone and is willing to participate in 4 sessions with the chaplain
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score ranging from 0 (fully active) to 3 (able to conduct limited self-care in bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours)
  • Has low Spiritual Well-Being score of 35 or less on the FACIT-Sp
  • Subject makes 2 or fewer errors on the Callahan 6-item cognitive screener administered during screening

Exclusion criteria

  • Subject makes 3 or more errors on the Callahan 6-item cognitive screener administered during screening, or exhibits significant psychiatric or cognitive impairment (e.g., dementia/delirium, intellectual disability, active psychosis) that in the judgment of the research team would preclude providing informed consent and study participation
  • Currently receiving hospice care Note: subjects who enroll in hospice during the trial will have the option of continuing trial participation
  • Have had a visit with a healthcare chaplain within the past 3 months

Treatment and study plan

Spiritual Care

Behavioral

Participants in the Spiritual Care intervention discuss topics consistent with the Spiritual Care Assessment and Intervention (SCAI) framework including meaning and purpose, relationships, transcendence and peace, and self-worth and identity.

Informational Support

Behavioral

Participants in the Informational Support comparator arm discuss topics including quality of life, financial resources, and evaluating health information.

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of feasibility of the Spiritual Care Assessment and Intervention (SCAI) framework vs informational support

    Time frame: Visits 1-4, approximately weekly, within 3 months of enrollment

    Percentage of participants 1) enrolling; 2) completing 3 or more intervention sessions; 3) completing all study interviews

  2. Evaluation of acceptability of the Spiritual Care Assessment and Intervention (SCAI) framework vs informational support

    Time frame: Visits 1-4, approximately weekly, within 3 months of enrollment; survey 1-week post-intervention

    Acceptability Intervention Measure (AIM) This 4-item scale was developed as part of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to evaluate intervention acceptability. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Responses are averaged to create a scale score. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability. This is a primary outcome for patients.

  3. Test the effects of spiritual care on the outcome of spiritual wellbeing

    Time frame: 1, 6, and 12 weeks post intervention

    Measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Spirituality (FACIT-Sp): Spiritual wellbeing will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spirituality (FACIT-Sp) 12-item measure. Each item is rated when considering the past week on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Scores are the sum of individual items with total scores ranging from 0 to 48. Higher scores indicate higher spiritual well-being. This is a primary outcome for patients.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Effects of Spiritual Care Assessment and Intervention (SCAI) framework on anxiety

    Time frame: 1, 6, and 12 weeks post intervention

    Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7 (GAD-7): Anxiety will be measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 item survey. Each item is rated when considering the past two weeks on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Scores are the sum of individual items with total scores ranging from 0 to 21. Scores of 5-9, 10-14, and 15 and above indicate mild, moderate, and severe anxiety, respectively. This is a secondary outcome for patients.

  2. Effects of Spiritual Care Assessment and Intervention (SCAI) framework on depression

    Time frame: 1, 6, and 12 weeks post intervention

    Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8): Depressive symptoms will be measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 item survey. Each item is rated when considering the past two weeks on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Scores are the sum of individual items with total scores ranging from 0 to 24. Scores of 5-9, 10-14, and 15 and above indicate mild, moderate, and severe depression, respectively. This is a secondary outcome for patients.

  3. Effects of Spiritual Care Assessment and Intervention (SCAI) framework on satisfaction with spiritual care

    Time frame: 1, 6, and 12 weeks post intervention

    Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ):

    Satisfaction will be assessed using the 8-item Client Satisfaction Questionnaire. Each item is rated on a scale from 1 to 4. Items # 1, 3, 6, and 7 are reverse-scored and then the 8 items are summed with higher total scores indicating greater satisfaction. This is a secondary outcome for patients.

  4. Effects of Spiritual Care Assessment and Intervention (SCAI) framework on meaning and purpose

    Time frame: 1, 6, and 12 weeks post intervention

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Meaning & Purpose Short Form: Meaning and purpose will be assessed using this 7-item PROMIS measure. Each item is rated when considering the past week on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much). The 7 items are summed with higher total scores indicating greater meaning and purpose. This is a secondary outcome for patients.

  5. Effects of Spiritual Care Assessment and Intervention (SCAI) framework on religious coping

    Time frame: 1, 6, and 12 weeks post intervention

    Brief Religious Coping Scale (RCOPE): Religious coping will be measured using the 14-item Brief Religious Coping Scale, which includes two subscales of 7 items each: positive religious coping and negative religious coping. Each item is rated on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (a great deal). Subscale scores are calculated separately as sum scores. Scores range from 0 to 21 for each subscale, with higher scores indicating higher usage. The subscale scores are analyzed independently, as they are often uncorrelated. This is a secondary outcome for patients.

  6. Effects of Spiritual Care Assessment and Intervention (SCAI) framework on positive affect

    Time frame: 1, 6, and 12 weeks post intervention

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Positive Affect Short Form: Positive affect will be assessed using this 15-item PROMIS measure. Each item is rated when considering the past week on a scale from 1 (not at al) to 5 (very much). The 15 items are summed with higher total scores indicating greater positive affect. This is a secondary outcome for patients.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Indiana University

Other

Collaborators

  • Walther Cancer Foundation

Registry information

Acronym: PRaCTIS

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Sep 16, 2025
Registry last updated
Jul 2, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.