Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05681520

Pilot of Peers Enhancing Engagement for Pain Services

Chronic non-cancer pain is common among Veterans, and more work is needed to understand how best to support Veterans with chronic pain to improve pain-related function and quality of life. Peer specialists may be valuable resource to support Veterans in pain management. Peer specialists, individuals with lived experience who are hired and trained to work with Veterans, are increasingly being used outside traditional mental health settings. More research is needed to understand how best to train peer specialists to work in new settings and with new presenting problems, such as chronic pain. Peer support to help Veterans improve pain-related function, increase physical activity, and engage in recommended pain care, is especially needed. In this study, the investigators will finalize a peer-led intervention and then pilot it with 24 Veterans with chronic pain in order to establish feasibility and acceptability; results will be used to develop a larger proposal testing the intervention in a randomized trial.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

VA Connecticut Healthcare System West Haven Campus, West Haven, CT

West Haven, Connecticut, 06516-2770, United States

About this study

Background: Chronic pain, and particularly high-impact chronic pain (that is, pain last three months or longer that impacts daily functioning in one or more domains) is a leading cause of disability, often associated with declining functioning, lost days of work, and worsened quality of life. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) identified both improved pain management and reduced opioid-related harms as national priorities, with an emphasis on improving function and pain-related disability. Peer specialists may be an untapped and valuable resource to support Veterans with chronic pain and enhance the effectiveness of pain treatment. Peer specialists are individuals with lived experience who work with Veterans to encourage patient activation and help patients manage chronic conditions. Peer specialists work in a variety of clinical settings, most commonly mental health clinics, and are well-suited to help patients who are harder to engage in services or those needing more support to promote self-management strategies. Peer support is particularly effective for patients with more severe illnesses or higher levels of distress, and thus may be helpful for Veterans with high-impact chronic pain.

Significance: Chronic pain is one of the most common and costly problems among Veterans using VHA healthcare. VHA guidelines for pain management and opioid therapy encourage non-pharmacological pain management strategies (NPMs) and non-opioid medications for chronic pain management. However, NPMs that emphasize improved pain-related function are often underutilized. Addressing pain management and opioid misuse are VHA priorities and this research directly aligns with VHA Rehabilitation Research & Development (RR&D) priorities, including promotion of non-pharmacological activity-based interventions for chronic pain, impacting outcomes such as pain; it also aligns with RR&D's broader goal of maximizing Veteran's function and quality of life.

Innovation & Impact: The role of peer specialists in VHA is rapidly expanding beyond traditional mental health settings, leading to an urgent need for additional research to understand how best to use peer specialists' unique skills to enhance care for Veterans in a wider range of settings. No studies to date have evaluated the use of peer specialists to support improvements in pain-related function among Veterans with chronic pain. The current proposal is innovative because it proposes, for the first time, using peer specialists to focus on pain management. If proven effective, this project could pave the way for widespread implementation of peer specialists into new settings where they can support pain management.

Specific Aims: The specific aims of this project are to (1) Use intervention mapping (IM) to refine the intervention, Peers Enhancing Engagement for Pain Services (PEEPS) and (2) Pilot test the feasibility and acceptability of PEEPS and collect function-focused outcome measures for use in a rigorous prospective study.

Methodology: After refining the intervention protocol using intervention mapping, the investigators propose a single arm pilot trial where the investigators will enroll 24 Veterans with high-impact chronic pain to participate in PEEPS, collecting data at baseline and three-months post baseline. The primary focus will be feasibility and acceptability; the investigators will also collect data on pain-related function, activity (steps walked, using pedometers), and well-being/quality of life.

Next Steps/Implementation: These data will inform the development of a larger proposal testing PEEPS in a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Veteran receiving care from VA Connecticut Healthcare System
  • referred to a VA Connecticut Pain Management Team
  • has high-impact chronic pain as defined by the Graded Chronic Pain Scale - Revised
  • willing/able to participate in sessions either in person or via video

Exclusion criteria

  • moderate to severe cognitive impairment or apparent difficulty communicating with the research staff
  • inability to read or understand English
  • severely impaired hearing or speech that would preclude them from participating in telephone interviews

Treatment and study plan

PEEPS

Behavioral

Working with a peer specialist for six 30-minute sessions to enhance engagement in pain management approaches/treatments

Other names: Peer Specialist Intervention

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility - Number of completers

    Time frame: through study completion, approximately 18 months

    Number of Veterans who completed at least 3 sessions with the peer specialist

  2. Acceptability

    Time frame: 3 months

    Intervention acceptability as indicated by results of qualitative interviews

Secondary outcomes

  1. Feasibility - Recruiting 24 participants

    Time frame: through study completion, approximately 18 months

    Ability to recruit 24 participants over the study period

  2. Feasibility - Enrollment of >15% of those invited

    Time frame: through study completion, approximately 18 months

    An enrollment rate of greater or equal to 15% of those invited to participate

  3. Feasibility - Retention >60%

    Time frame: through study completion, approximately 18 months

    A retention rate of greater or equal to 60% of enrolled Veterans completing follow-up measures

  4. Acceptability - Quantitative

    Time frame: 3 months

    Intervention acceptability as indicated by a score of 24 or greater on the CSQ-8

Other outcomes

  1. Pain Interference

    Time frame: 3 months

    Brief Pain Inventory (BPI); we are piloting this measure for use in a future randomized trial. One-point decrease is often considered clinically meaningfully (range 0-10, lower scores are better).

  2. Physical Function

    Time frame: 3 months

    Steps per day as measured by pedometer; we are piloting this measure for use in a future randomized trial. Improvement indicated by increased average steps per day.

  3. Well-being

    Time frame: 3 months

    Well-Being Signs tool; we are piloting this three-item measure for use in a future randomized trial (higher scores are better, range 0-10)

  4. Quality of Life

    Time frame: 3 months

    Health-related quality of life as measured by SF12; we are piloting this measure for use in a future randomized trial (range 0-100, higher scores are better)

  5. Pain self-management

    Time frame: 3 months

    Modified version of Chronic Pain Coping Inventory (CPCI); we are piloting this measure for use in a future randomized trial. Improvement indicated by increased use of adaptive pain coping skills (items are scored 0 to 7, higher scores better)

  6. Healthcare engagement

    Time frame: 3 months

    Altarum Consumer Engagement (ACE); we are piloting this measure for use in a future randomized trial. Improvement indicated by more engagement with healthcare (items are scored 1 to 5, high scores better)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development

Fed

Registry information

Acronym: PEEPS

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Jan 12, 2023
Registry last updated
Jan 27, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.