Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02192918

Pilot Investigation of Behavioral Alternatives to Indoor Tanning

The goal of this research is to develop and test the feasibility of an intervention that stimulates uptake of healthy alternatives to tanning by providing free access to them for a limited time. Free access gives participants a low-risk opportunity to try something new that is consistent with their motivations. Free access also allows them to experience the reinforcing properties of the alternatives which could prime continued use after the free trial period. The objective of the present study is to determine the feasibility and short-term efficacy of providing free alternatives to indoor tanners in an effort to "nudge" them to switch from indoor tanning to healthy alternatives.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

16 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Massachusetts Medical School

Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655, United States

About this study

Melanoma is the second most common cancer diagnosed in young women and is responsible for nearly 8,000 US deaths per year. Exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) increases risk for melanoma. The International Agency for Research on Cancer assigned indoor tanning (IT; use of tanning beds or booths), as a class 1 carcinogen joining arsenic, asbestos, and mustard gas. Unfortunately, interventions educating tanners about the risks have not been very effective. Many tanners are more motivated by the immediate consequences of tanning than the delayed consequence of possibly getting cancer. Research shows the primary motivation for indoor tanning is to improve physical appearance, but a secondary motivation is stress reduction. Behavioral economics theory suggests that the rate of a behavior depends on 1) the reinforcing value of that behavior relative to alternatives, 2) the cost of engaging in the behavior relative to alternatives, and 3) the availability of the behavior relative to alternatives. The purpose of the present study is to determine whether exposure to healthy alternatives changes the behavior of indoor tanners. The investigators will randomize tanners to conditions differing in physical appearance and stress reduction alternatives to determine whether they can get their motivational needs met in healthier ways.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female
  • Ages 16-65
  • Report minimum of 10 indoor tanning visits in the last year with intentions to continue

Exclusion criteria

  • Ages <16 or >65
  • Pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant during the study period
  • Reporting less than 10 indoor tanning visits per year
  • No intention to continue indoor tanning
  • Using sunless tanning more than once in the last year and ever in the last 3 months
  • Physically limited to do yoga or dance classes
  • DHA allergy
  • Inability to consent
  • Prisoners

Treatment and study plan

Airbrush

Behavioral

The American Academy of Dermatology Sun Smart pamphlet will be given at the baseline session. It has brief tips for reducing skin cancer risk, but does not mention sunless tanning or relaxation activities. Participants in the airbrush condition will receive 4 airbrush tan sessions, once every two weeks, over the course of 2 months.

Airbrush Plus

Behavioral

The American Academy of Dermatology Sun Smart pamphlet will be given at the baseline session. It has brief tips for reducing skin cancer risk, but does not mention sunless tanning or relaxation activities. Participants will complete 4 airbrush tan sessions, once every two weeks, over the course of 2 months. Additionally, they may choose 8 sessions, 1 per week, of the following activities at no cost: massage, pedicure, yoga class, or dance class.

Delayed Airbrush

Behavioral

The American Academy of Dermatology Sun Smart pamphlet will be given at the baseline session. It has brief tips for reducing skin cancer risk, but does not mention sunless tanning or relaxation activities. Participants will receive access to one of each of the following after the 6-month assessment at no cost: airbrush tan, massage, pedicure, yoga class, and dance class

Primary outcomes

  1. Satisfaction

    Time frame: up to 12 months

    A measure of satisfaction will be assessed for each alternative visit on a scale of 1-10 immediately after each activity is completed. Visits occur between baseline and 12 months of participation. Timing of visits depend on which condition is assigned.

  2. Effort of alternatives

    Time frame: 6-month follow-up

    Perceived effort of alternatives will be discussed in a focus group setting.

  3. Recruitment rate

    Time frame: baseline

    Total randomized and total screened out.

  4. Retention

    Time frame: 12 month follow-up

    % sessions complete and total withdrawn from study

Secondary outcomes

  1. abstinence

    Time frame: 2-month follow-up

    the percent of participants who abstained from indoor tanning.

  2. abstinence

    Time frame: 3-month follow-up

    the percent of participants who abstained from indoor tanning.

  3. abstinence

    Time frame: 6-month follow-up

    the percent of participants who abstained from indoor tanning.

  4. abstinence

    Time frame: 12-month follow-up

    the percent of participants who abstained from indoor tanning.

Other outcomes

  1. Cost of indoor tanning

    Time frame: 2-month follow-up

    Total amount spent on tanning since the previous assessment.

  2. Cost of indoor tanning

    Time frame: 3-month follow-up

    Total amount spent on tanning since the previous assessment.

  3. Cost of indoor tanning

    Time frame: 6-month follow-up

    Total amount spent on tanning since the previous assessment.

  4. Cost of indoor tanning

    Time frame: 12-month follow-up

    Total amount spent on tanning since the previous assessment.

  5. Stress Level

    Time frame: 2-month follow-up

    Perceived Stress Scale

  6. Stress Level

    Time frame: 3-month follow-up

    Perceived Stress Scale

  7. Stress Level

    Time frame: 6-month follow-up

    Perceived Stress Scale

  8. Stress Level

    Time frame: 12-month follow-up

    Perceived Stress Scale

  9. Attitudes

    Time frame: 3-month follow-up

    Indoor Tanning Attitude Scale and the same scale modified for each of the alternatives

  10. Attitudes

    Time frame: 6-month follow-up

    Indoor Tanning Attitude Scale and the same scale modified for each of the alternatives

  11. Attitudes

    Time frame: 12-month follow-up

    Indoor Tanning Attitude Scale and the same scale modified for each of the alternatives

  12. Tanning Dependence

    Time frame: 2-month follow-up

    modified CAGE

  13. Tanning Dependence

    Time frame: 3-month follow-up

    modified CAGE

  14. Tanning Dependence

    Time frame: 6-month follow-up

    modified CAGE

  15. Tanning Dependence

    Time frame: 12-month follow-up

    modified CAGE

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Massachusetts, Worcester

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Jul 17, 2014
Registry last updated
May 6, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.