Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06681649

Pilot Feasibility Study of a Pragmatic Mixed-Methods Randomized Controlled Trial on a Follow-Up Bundle of Care for ICU Survivors and Caregivers

~80% of ICU survivors experience profound long-term cognitive, physical, and psychiatric impairments known as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). Caregivers additionally experience similar detrimental psychosocial effects following discharge. Despite this knowledge, follow-up care is almost non-existent. ICU follow-up clinics may mitigate these long-term impacts, but lack evaluation of their effectiveness. This trial will evaluate the effectiveness of ICU follow-up clinics vs. standard-of-care in improving qualitative/clinical outcomes of ICU survivors and caregivers, with those receiving follow-up care hypothesized to have improved outcomes.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Queen's University

Kingston, Ontario, K7L 2V7, Canada

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Gordon Boyd, MD PhD FRCPC

CONTACT

[email protected]

6135392754

J G Boyd, MD PhD FRCPC

CONTACT

About this study

~80% of ICU survivors experience profound long-term cognitive, physical, and psychiatric impairments known as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS), with patients experiencing prolonged delirium or mechanical ventilation having a heightened risk. Caregivers additionally experience similar detrimental psychosocial effects following discharge. Despite this knowledge, follow-up care is almost non-existent. ICU follow-up clinics may mitigate these long-term impacts, but lack evaluation of their effectiveness. This pragmatic, mixed-methods, open-label randomized (1:1) controlled trial will evaluate the effectiveness of ICU follow-up clinics vs. standard-of-care in improving qualitative/clinical outcomes of ICU survivors and caregivers, with those receiving follow-up care hypothesized to have improved outcomes.

The intervention group will receive: 1) specialized follow-up care at 1- and 3-months following discharge, 2) information packages on expectations following discharge, and 3) diaries for the healthcare team, family, and patient to journal their experiences throughout recovery. The control group will receive generalized standard of care through their primary care provider. Focus groups will be used for qualitative assessment to elucidate what patients find most important for their recovery, using a patient-centred approach. Clinical assessments will evaluate neurocognitive function, quality of life, anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and resiliency among both ICU survivors and caregivers; chronic pain, fatigue, activities of daily living, lower extremity strength, polypharmacy, and hospital readmissions among ICU survivors; and caregiver burden and sleep quality among caregivers.

ICU survivorship extends beyond surviving the ICU. This program of research will unravel the aspects of follow-up care needed to mitigate the long-term impacts of PICS and improve patient and caregiver outcomes. This study is a first-step toward achieving this goal, by understanding barriers to successful recruitment, enrolment, data collection, and follow-up in this vulnerable cohort of ICU survivors and caregivers.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

- ICU survivors

  • Adult patients (age greater than or equal to 18 years)
  • Life expectancy greater than or equal to 6 months as determined by the attending physician
  • High risk for long-term functional sequelae following ICU discharge, defined as ICU stay greater than or equal to 4 days, or involving at least one of:
  • mechanical ventilation (any, i.e., invasive or non-invasive)
  • tracheostomy
  • delirium (defined as Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) positive or documented history of delirium in the patient's medical record by the clinical care team at some point during their ICU admission)
  • lack of access to a primary care physician for clinical follow-up
  • access to email or mail to complete follow-up questionnaires
  • presence of an informal caregiver

Inclusion criteria

- Caregivers

  • Informal caregiver (e.g., spouse, offspring) for ICU survivor as defined above
  • Adult (age greater than or equal to 18 years)

Exclusion criteria

- ICU survivors and caregivers

  • Neurological or communication difficulties which would preclude completion of follow-up assessments or participation in focus groups
  • Inability to speak or read English (required for completion of standardized questionnaires, clinical assessments, and for participation in focus groups)
  • Failure to provide consent/failure to have consent provided by a substitute decision maker

Treatment and study plan

Intervention

Behavioral

The intervention group will receive follow-up care through the specialized post-ICU follow-up clinic at KHSC at approximately 1- and 3-months following ICU discharge. Caregivers will also be invited to participate in the follow-up clinic along with the ICU survivor participant.

In addition to receiving specialized follow-up clinical care, ICU survivor participants and their caregivers will also receive the following additional items as part of a bundled care intervention program (see Appendix):

  • Informational pamphlet on critical illness and expectations following ICU discharge
  • Flyer on critical illness and expectations following ICU discharge (brief version, which may be placed on the participant's refrigerator or other location at home as a consistent reminder)
  • Diaries in which the healthcare team, family members, and the patient themselves are able to journal their experiences, updates, progress, and barriers in the ICU and following discharge

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility - Consent Rate

    Time frame: 6 months

    To determine the feasibility of a pragmatic RCT evaluating the impact of a post-ICU follow-up clinic intervention on clinical and qualitative patient and caregiver outcomes, as assessed via the following measure:

    Consent rate, measured as the proportion of eligible population who consent to participate

  2. Feasibility - Enrolment Rate

    Time frame: 6 months

    To determine the feasibility of a pragmatic RCT evaluating the impact of a post-ICU follow-up clinic intervention on clinical and qualitative patient and caregiver outcomes, as assessed via the following measures:

    Enrolment rate, measured as the proportion of consented participants who are randomized

  3. Feasibility - Follow-Up Rate

    Time frame: 6 months

    To determine the feasibility of a pragmatic RCT evaluating the impact of a post-ICU follow-up clinic intervention on clinical and qualitative patient and caregiver outcomes, as assessed via the following measures:

    Follow-up rate, measured as the proportion of enrolled participants who complete follow-up visits at 1-, 3-, and 6-months

  4. Feasibility - Data Capture Rate

    Time frame: 6 months

    To determine the feasibility of a pragmatic RCT evaluating the impact of a post-ICU follow-up clinic intervention on clinical and qualitative patient and caregiver outcomes, as assessed via the following measures:

    Data capture rate, measured as the percentage of data elements acquired at each study time point

  5. Feasibility - Rate of adverse events

    Time frame: 6 months

    To determine the feasibility of a pragmatic RCT evaluating the impact of a post-ICU follow-up clinic intervention on clinical and qualitative patient and caregiver outcomes, as assessed via the following measures:

    Rate of adverse events, assessed using the number of hospital and ICU readmissions, as well as the number of visits to the emergency department at 6 months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Qualitative impact of intervention

    Time frame: 6 months

    To determine the qualitative impact of a post-ICU follow-up care intervention on patients and caregivers, as assessed via qualitative analysis of focus group discussions.

  2. Process evaluation

    Time frame: 6 months

    To perform a process evaluation of the multimodal ICU follow-up bundle of care intervention to understand the implementation, acceptability, content, barriers, and facilitators to use of diaries, informational materials, and the follow-up clinic.

Other outcomes

  1. Neurocognition

    Time frame: 6 months

    Neurocognitive outcomes, as measured using the MoCA

  2. Weight and BMI

    Time frame: 6 months

    To determine the effect of a post-ICU follow-up clinic intervention on changes in weight and body-mass index (BMI) following ICU discharge

  3. Clinical Outcome

    Time frame: 6 months

    Frailty, as measured using the CFS

  4. Quality of Life

    Time frame: 6 months

    Quality of life outcomes, as measured using the SF-36

  5. Anxiety and mood

    Time frame: 6 months

    Anxiety and depression, as measured using the HADS

  6. Post-traumatic stress

    Time frame: 6 months

    PTSD, as measured using the PTSS-14

  7. Chronic pain

    Time frame: 6 months

    Chronic pain, as measured using the Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS)

  8. Fatigue

    Time frame: 6 months

    Chronic fatigue, as measured using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)

  9. Activities of daily living

    Time frame: 6 months

    Activities of daily living (ADLs), as measured using the Katz Index of ADLs

  10. Instrumental activities of daily living

    Time frame: 6 months

    Instrumental ADLs, as measured using the Lawton IADL score

  11. Physical function

    Time frame: 6 months

    Lower extremity strength, as measured using the 30-second Sit-to-Stand Test

  12. Resiliency

    Time frame: 6 months

    Dyadic resiliency among ICU survivors and caregivers, as measured using the dyadic Connor-Davidson 10-item Resiliency Scale (CD-RISC-10)

  13. Return to work

    Time frame: 6 months

    To determine the effect of a post-ICU follow-up clinic intervention on return to work by ICU survivors

  14. Employment status of caregivers

    Time frame: 6 months

    Employment status relative to previous among caregivers

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

J G Boyd, MD PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

6135496666 x6228 ext. 6228

Natasha A Jawa, MSc

CONTACT

[email protected]

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Queen's University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Improving Medical and Psychological Outcomes After Discharge - Feasibility Study for a Pragmatic, Mixed-methods, Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Effectiveness of a Follow-up Clinic for ICU Survivors and Caregivers

Acronym: IMPACT-ICU

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Nov 8, 2024
Registry last updated
Dec 4, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.