Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07324265

Pilot Cluster RCT of an Indirect Contact Mental Health Literacy Program for 5th-Grade Students

This cluster-randomized pilot trial will evaluate the preliminary effects and feasibility of adding an indirect contact component to a school-based mental health literacy (MHL) lesson for 5th-grade students in a public elementary school in Tokyo, Japan. Four 5th-grade classes (approximately 150 students in total) will be randomized by class (two classes per arm). All students will receive a 45-minute lesson that includes an animated video and educational slides. In the intervention arm, teachers will additionally introduce a short story about a well-known soccer player who experienced and recovered from a mental health condition, serving as an indirect contact element. The control arm will receive the standard lesson without this component.

Students will complete questionnaires at baseline (T1), immediately after the lesson (T2), and 2-3 months later (T3). The primary outcome is vignette-based social distance toward a peer with mental health problems. Secondary outcomes include mental health knowledge, help-seeking intentions, perceived need for help, intended sources of help. As a pilot study with only four clusters, the trial is not powered to detect small effects; findings will be used to estimate effect sizes and assess feasibility for a future larger-scale trial.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

10 year–11 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Tokyo

Bunkyō-Ku, Tokyo, Japan

About this study

This study investigates whether incorporating an indirect contact component into an existing school-based mental health literacy (MHL) program enhances reductions in stigma-specifically vignette-based social distance-among elementary school students. Indirect contact is implemented through a teacher-delivered story describing the lived experience and recovery of a well-known soccer player who publicly disclosed his mental illness. This approach aims to promote empathy, reduce negative stereotypes, and strengthen intentions to seek or recommend appropriate help.

The study uses a cluster-randomized parallel-group design, with four 5th-grade classes assigned (2:2) to either the intervention or control condition. Both groups receive a standardized 45-minute MHL lesson including an animated educational video and discussion materials. The intervention arm additionally receives the indirect contact component within the same 45-minute period. The lesson is delivered by classroom teachers.

Assessments occur at three time points:

  • T1 (baseline): before the lesson
  • T2 (post-test): immediately after the lesson
  • T3 (follow-up): 2-3 months after the lesson

The primary outcome is a 5-item social distance scale based on a vignette ("A-san") describing symptoms consistent with depression. Secondary outcomes include:

  • mental health knowledge
  • intentions to support a friend with similar problems
  • perceived need for help
  • personal help-seeking intentions
  • intended help-seeking sources

Because this is a pilot trial, the goals are to evaluate feasibility (recruitment, retention, acceptability, implementation fidelity) and to estimate preliminary effect sizes to inform sample size calculations for a future fully powered cluster randomized trial. After T3 data collection, students in the control arm will be offered an educational supplement that includes the indirect contact story.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Students enrolled in one of the four participating 5th-grade classes at a public elementary school in Tokyo, Japan.

Aged 10-11 years old. Passive consent obtained from guardians; verbal assent obtained from children. Able to complete self-report questionnaires.

Exclusion criteria

Students whose parents/guardians opted out of the study.

Note: Students who were absent on the day of the pre-test (T1) were excluded from the analysis population but not from the initial study cohort.

Treatment and study plan

Indirect Contact

Behavioral

A 45-minute school-based mental health literacy lesson including an animated video, educational slides, and an additional indirect contact component in the form of a teacher-delivered story about a well-known soccer player who experienced and recovered from a mental health condition.

Standard MHL Lesson Only

Behavioral

A 45-minute standard mental health literacy lesson including an animated educational video and slides, without the indirect contact story component.

Primary outcomes

  1. Social Distance Scale Score (Stigma)

    Time frame: Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 2-3 month follow-up (T3)

    A 4-item scale adapted from the Social Distance Scale using a vignette format. (Note: The scale was originally administered with 5 items; however, Items 4 and 5 were found to be duplicates during data checking, and Item 5 was excluded from the primary outcome score. The 4-item version was used for the primary analysis.) Each item rated on a 4-point scale (1=definitely willing to 4=definitely unwilling), total score range 4-16. Higher scores indicate greater stigma. Cronbach's alpha was 0.82.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mental Health Knowledge Score

    Time frame: Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 2-3 month follow-up (T3)

    An 8-item true/false questionnaire developed based on the SMHLP content. Scores range from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge about mental health and illnesses. Cronbach's alpha was 0.65 at trial registration (based on preliminary/reference data); in the final analytic sample (n = 105, baseline), Cronbach's alpha was 0.69 (McDonald's omega = 0.70).

  2. Help-Seeking Intention

    Time frame: Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 2-3 month follow-up (T3)

    A vignette-based item asking whether students themselves would seek help if they were experiencing similar mental health difficulties. Responses were on a 4-point scale: "Definitely yes", "Probably yes", "Probably not", and "Definitely not". Students were considered to have the intention to seek help if they responded "Definitely yes".

  3. Recognition of the necessity to seek help

    Time frame: Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 2-3 month follow-up (T3)

    A single vignette-based item asking whether students thought the character in the scenario should seek help from others. Responses were on a 4-point scale: "Definitely yes", "Probably yes", "Probably not", and "Definitely not". Students were considered to recognize the necessity to seek help when they responded "Definitely yes".

  4. Intention to Help Peers

    Time frame: Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 2-3 month follow-up (T3)

    Students were asked to rate their likelihood of performing various desirable supportive behaviors for a peer in distress. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale. Students were considered to have the intention to help if they selected "Definitely yes" for at least one of the behaviors. An example of a behavior is: "I would ask about or listen to their story to understand their situation in detail."

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Tokyo University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Cluster-Randomized Pilot Trial of a School-Based Mental Health Literacy Program With and Without an Indirect Contact Component for 5th-Grade Students

Acronym: SMHLP-IC

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jan 7, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 22, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.