Universidade Estadual do Norte do Paraná
Jacarezinho, Paraná, 86400-000, Brazil
NCT Number: NCT07107061
Pilates exercises have been shown to be effective for a range of outcomes; however, it is unclear whether they can effectively contribute to fat mass reduction, especially when compared with a technique known to be effective for this purpose, such as aerobic training. Furthermore, Pilates' potential for increasing lean mass also requires further investigation. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of Pilates compared with aerobic training, as well as the combination of these activities, on body composition in young adults. Eighty women aged 18 to 40 years were randomized to four groups: Pilates (n = 20), aerobic (n = 20), Pilates plus aerobic (n = 20), and control (n = 20). Body composition was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), considering: total fat mass (kg), percentage of total fat mass (%), total lean mass (kg), and total lean mass adjusted for height (kg/m²). Additionally, total body mass (kg) and body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2) values were considered. The interventions were carried out for 12 weeks, three times a week, lasting 60 minutes/session. Analyses were performed by intention-to-treat and per protocol.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–40 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Jacarezinho, Paraná, 86400-000, Brazil
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Pilates exercises are characterized as muscle strengthening and stretching, while aerobic exercises are characterized as a modality that works cardiorespiratory fitness.
Other names: Pilates, aeróbio
Pilates exercises are characterized as muscle strengthening and stretching.
Other names: Pilates
Aerobic exercises are characterized as a modality that works cardiorespiratory fitness.
Other names: aerobic
Time frame: Baseline and after 12 weeks
Percentage of total body fat mass assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Time frame: Baseline and after 12 weeks
Absolute total body lean mass assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Time frame: Baseline and after 12 weeks
Absolute total body fat mass assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Time frame: Baseline and after 12 weeks
Total lean mass adjusted for height assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Time frame: Baseline and after 12 weeks
Trunk fat mass assessed by dual-energy X-ray densitometry (DXA)
Time frame: Baseline and after 12 weeks
Upper limb fat mass assessed by dual-energy X-ray densitometry (DXA)
Time frame: Baseline and after 12 weeks
Lower limb fat mass assessed by dual-energy X-ray densitometry (DXA)
Time frame: Baseline and after 12 weeks
Trunk lean mass assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Time frame: Baseline and after 12 weeks
Upper limb lean mass assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Time frame: Baseline and after 12 weeks
Lower limb lean mass assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Time frame: Baseline and after 12 weeks
Total body mass assessed by precision scale
Time frame: Baseline and after 12 weeks
Body mass index calculated by the ratio of total body mass (measured by a precision scale) to height (measured by a stadiometer) squared
Universidade Estadual do Norte do Parana
Other
Pilates and Aerobic Training on Body Composition in Young Adults: a Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.