Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02768272

PIEB vs PCEA With Epidural or CSE Technique. A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial

The investigators have design a randomized double blind clinical trial to know the incidence of breaktrough pain (BP) in high-risk of BP parturients (nulliparous with early cervical dilation) comparing two epidural analgesic regimes: programed intermittent epidural boluses versus patient controlled epidural analgesia. The role of the epidural technique (epidural versus combined spinal-epidural) in the incidence of BP will be also evaluated.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–40 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

University Hospital La Paz

Madrid, 28046, Spain

About this study

Women in labor receiving epidural analgesia may experience breakthrough pain (BP) that requires the use of additional medication and that is a source of dissatisfaction with the analgesic treatment for labor.

The investigators can define two types of BP: 'primary breakthrough pain' is the first moment when the patient requests analgesia during labor. 'Secondary breakthrough pain' can be defined as the time a previously effective epidural analgesia turns ineffective.

The BP may have multiple causes, such as delivery progression and catheter misplacement. There is no single pattern to provide adequate neuraxial analgesia for labor, but for certain patients and specific clinical situations some methods provide advantages over others.

The choice of a suitable system of epidural drug delivery has an important role in getting proper analgesia and a low incidence of breakthrough pain during labor. In order to develop preventive strategies for BP, some clinical scales to estimate its incidence rate have been described. Among risk factors for BP the investigators can include: Nulliparity, epidural catheter placement at an earlier cervical dilation, neonatal weight and technique performed (epidural versus combined spinal-epidural - CSE).

In addition, technological development has offered us new treatment modalities of pain management during childbirth have evolved recently to improve maternal satisfaction, as well as to treat and prevent BP: Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) added or not to a continuous epidural infusion (CEI), computer integrated PCEA (CI-PCEA) and automatic or programed intermittent epidural boluses (PIEB).

Nowadays, there is no evidence about the best epidural analgesic treatment or the optimum epidural punction in order to reduce BP episodes and, hence, increase maternal satisfaction.

Therefore, the investigators have design a randomized double blind clinical trial to know the incidence of breaktrough pain (BP) in high-risk of BP parturients (nulliparous with early cervical dilation) comparing two epidural analgesic regimes added to a contiuous infusion of L-bupivacaine plus fentanyl: programed intermittent epidural boluses versus patient controlled epidural analgesia. The role of the epidural technique (epidural versus combined spinal-epidural) in the incidence of BP will be also evaluated.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18 and 40 years
  • Gestational age between 37 and 41 weeks
  • Singleton pregnancies
  • Nulliparity
  • Spontaneous or induced labor
  • Cervical dilation less than four centimeters

Exclusion criteria

  • Do not meet all the inclusion criteria
  • Do not consent to the study
  • Systemic medical pathologies as pre-eclampsia, insulin-treated gestational diabetes or multiple sclerosis that could influence medical decision during labour and/or make randomization unfeasible
  • Contraindication for neuraxial analgesia

Treatment and study plan

PCEA vs PIEB

Device

We evaluate the relation between the distribution of L-bupivacaine plus fentanyl in the epidural space and the incedence of breaktrough pain during labor

Epidural vs CSE

Procedure

We evaluate the relation between the type of epidural technique and the incedence of breaktrough pain during labor

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of breakthrough pain

    Time frame: Labor

    Evaluation of breakthough pain episodes since epidural punction to delivery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total epidural infusion volume

    Time frame: Labor

    Measurement of the total epidural infusion volume administered to the patient

  2. Incidence of epidural failure

    Time frame: Labor

    Assesment the incidence of failed epdirual technique

  3. Mode of delivery (spontaneous, intrumental and cesarean section)

    Time frame: Delivery

    Analysis of the potential relation of the interventions with the type of delivery

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hospital Universitario La Paz

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial Comparing Programed Intermittent Epidural Boluses (PIEB) Versus Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) With Epidural or Combined Spinal-epidural (CSE) Technique

Acronym: PIEB-CT

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
May 11, 2016
Registry last updated
Aug 10, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.