PICO
DeviceSingle-use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System
Other names: Disposable NPWT
NCT Number: NCT01640366
The purpose of this study is to see if the use of a single-use negative pressure wound therapy system (NPWT) will have an effect on the reduction of post-surgical incision healing complications following breast reduction surgery and to assess the medium-term aesthetic appearance and quality of the resultant scar, compared with standard of care dressings.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
CHU de Nantes Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, France
The aim of the present study is to assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the Single-Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) system (PICO) with regard to the reduction of postsurgical incision healing complications during the immediate postoperative treatment phase, and to assess the medium-term aesthetic appearance and quality of the resultant scar, in patients undergoing reduction mammoplasty, compared to standard care.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Single-use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System
Other names: Disposable NPWT
Time frame: 21 days postoperatively
The primary variable of whether or not the incision developed a healing complication within 21 days of surgery was defined as the presence of at least one of the following:
All participants received both PICO and standard care dressings simultaneously during the course of the study; randomized to either right breast for PICO and left breast for standard of care OR right breast standard of care and left breast PICO.
Time frame: 21 days postoperatively
Assessment of the number of participants' incisions that experienced dehiscence (superficial, partial, or deep) occurring up to and 21 days postoperatively between incisions treated with PICO compared with standard care dressings.
All participants received both PICO and standard care dressings simultaneously during the course of the study; randomized to either right breast for PICO and left breast for standard of care OR right breast standard of care and left breast PICO.
Time frame: 21 days postoperatively
Assessment of the number of participants' incisions that experienced an infection (superficial or deep) occurring up to and 21 days postoperatively between incisions treated with PICO compared with standard care dressings.
All participants received both PICO and standard care dressings simultaneously during the course of the study; randomized to either right breast for PICO and left breast for standard of care OR right breast standard of care and left breast PICO.
Time frame: Within 7 days postoperatively
Assessment of the number of participants' incisions that experienced delayed healing within 7 days of surgery between incisions treated with PICO compared with standard care dressings.
All participants received both PICO and standard care dressings simultaneously during the course of the study; randomized to either right breast for PICO and left breast for standard of care OR right breast standard of care and left breast PICO.
Time frame: Within 10 days postoperatively
Assessment of the number of participants' incisions that experienced delayed healing within 10 days of surgery between incisions treated with PICO compared with standard care dressings.
All participants received both PICO and standard care dressings simultaneously during the course of the study; randomized to either right breast for PICO and left breast for standard of care OR right breast standard of care and left breast PICO.
Time frame: 90 days postoperatively
Assessment of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) between postsurgical incisions treated with PICO compared with standard care dressings.
VAS score: Assessed for color, appearance, contour, distortion, and texture. Each score ranged from 5 to 18; 5 being 'excellent' and 18 being 'poor.' Also, a global scar score was included in the total score.
POSAS score: Scored in 2 parts which added to create a total score, observer score and patient score. The lowest score of 1 showed 'normal' skin and the highest score of 10 showed the 'worst imaginable' result.
Observer score = 6 categories (vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, and surface area) each given a score of 1-10.
Patient score = 6 categories (scar pain, itching, color, stiffness, thickness, and irregularity each given a score of 1-10.
All participants received both PICO and standard care dressings simultaneously during the course of the study.
Time frame: 21 days postoperatively
The nipple and areola areas were not covered by the PICO or standard care dressing as part of the evaluation, they were all dressed the same with Steri-strips and dry gauze pads, which was essentially the standard care dressing regime.
All participants received both PICO and standard care dressings simultaneously during the course of the study; randomized to either right breast for PICO and left breast for standard of care OR right breast standard of care and left breast PICO.
Time frame: 21 days postoperatively
Assessment of participants developing a hematoma up to 21 days postoperatively for incisions treated with PICO compared with standard care dressings.
All participants received both PICO and standard care dressings simultaneously during the course of the study; randomized to either right breast for PICO and left breast for standard of care OR right breast standard of care and left breast PICO.
Time frame: 21 days postoperatively
Assessment of wound appearance demonstrating 100% wound closure at 21 days postoperatively for both PICO treatment and standard of care treatment.
All participants received both PICO and standard care dressings simultaneously during the course of the study; randomized to either right breast for PICO and left breast for standard of care OR right breast standard of care and left breast PICO.
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Industry
A Prospective, Randomized, Intra-patient, Comparative, Open, Multi-centre Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Single-Use NPWT System on the Prevention of Incision Healing Complications in Patients Undergoing Reduction Mammoplasty
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06634030
Surgical Wound, Wound Healing
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07255937
Arterial Leg Ulcer, Burns
Madrid, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07633977
Infections, Neurologic Manifestations
Dhulikhel, Bagmati, Nepal
View Trial DetailsNCT07601919
Surgical Wound, Wounds and Injuries
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial Details