Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT01913132

PICO Above Incisions After Vascular Surgery

The wound infection rate in the groin after vascular surgery has been denoted to be high since the wound surveillance register started in 2005. The current wound infection rate based on a validation study was 22.9% (24/105 patients with groin incision(s) between 1 March to 30 June in 2012). This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate if negative pressure wound therapy on closed inguinal incisions (INPWT) after vascular surgical procedures can reduce the risk for surgical site infections and other wound complications.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Vascular Centre, Malmö, Skåne University Hospital

Malmö, Sweden

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Stefan Acosta, MD PhD

CONTACT

About this study

As published in the study´s rational and design paper (DOI: 10.4236/ss.2015.612080), we conducted a reanalysis of the material that the original power calculation was based on and included elective cases only which led to a slightly different number of cases needed. Furthermore, it became clear that there were big differences in the infection rates of EVAR (endovascular aortic repair) and open vascular procedures and therefore the need to split the study into two arms, an EVAR arm and an OPEN arm.

To prove a significant effect of the treatment intervention in the EVAR arm with a wound infection rate reduction from previously 4.4% to 1%, 80% power, 5% significance level and Including a margin for loss to follow-up, the EVAR arm requires 497 inguinal incisions. Assuming a surgical site infection rate reduction from 30% to 10% in the OPEN arm of the study, 80% power and 5% significance level, a total of 147 inguinal incisions is required.

We conducted an unannounced interim analysis for a conference presentation that was conducted by the study's principal investigators Stefan Acosta and Julien Hasselmann. Staff in charge of the day-to-day activities of the trial were not involved or actively informed of this. We believe that using an objective wound assessment tool (ASEPSIS score) minimizes any potential bias associated with the interim analysis.

Since the vascular center Malmö has started using closure-devices for almost all EVAR cases and thereby creating virtually no wounds to assess, we have started a multi center extension of the EVAR arm to Örebro University Hospital to be able to include the outstanding cases.

FUNDING

The trial has been funded by public Swedish funds stemming from the Southmost region in Sweden (Region Skåne), the Skåne University Hospital and the Hulda Almroth foundation since 2015 and adds up to a total of 2.81 million SEK (about 311,000 USD). In addition the research group received an unrestricted unconditional research grant of 15,550 USD and a donation of 100 PICO dressing kits from Smith and Nephew in 2013.

ALF (Agreement on medical education and research) funding has been granted for the time period 2019 - 2022 but has not yet been defined monetarily.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients 18 years of age and above
  • Elective vascular surgery
  • Inguinal incision (transverse or longitudinal)
  • Capable of understanding the study information and giving written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Emergency surgery
  • Ongoing infection in inguinal area

Treatment and study plan

Negative pressure wound therapy with PICO (Smith & Nephew)

Device

Negative wound pressure therapy

Primary outcomes

  1. Wound infection rate

    Time frame: Wounds will be checked at 3 month follow-up

    ASEPSIS (Additional treatment, the presence of Serous discharge, Erythema, Purulent exudate, and Separation of the Deep tissues, the isolation of bacteria, and the duration of inpatient stay) score. Min 0 p, max > 40 p, higher values worse outcome

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Costs of treatment

    Time frame: Costs will be checked at 3 months of follow-up

    Systematic assessment of overall costs

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Stefan Acosta, MD PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+4640331000

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Stefan Acosta

Other

Registry information

Official study title

PICO Versus Standard Dressing on Groin Incisions After Vascular Surgery - a Prospective Randomized Trial (INVIPS Trial)

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jul 31, 2013
Registry last updated
Nov 29, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.