Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 5N4, Canada
NCT Number: NCT03957434
The aims of this pilot study are to examine the feasibility and to explore the effects of a physiotherapy treatment compared to standard usual care in gynecological cancer survivors with urinary incontinence in preparation of a large randomized controlled study.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
18 year–80 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 5N4, Canada
Epidemiological studies demonstrated a growing number of gynecological cancer survivors, and this population is at great risk of developing pelvic floor dysfunction after cancer and its treatment. Representing the most prevalent pelvic floor dysfunction, urinary incontinence affects up to 70% of gynecological cancer survivors. International practice guidelines, in line with available meta-analysis, recommend physiotherapy as a first-line treatment to reduce urinary incontinence. However, there is limited evidence on its effectiveness in gynecological cancer survivors. Considering the current knowledge and the negative impacts of urinary incontinence, there is an urgent need to examine whether this population can benefit from this intervention in a pilot study, to conduct eventually a larger randomized controlled trial. The objectives of the present study are to examine the feasibility and to explore the effects of a physiotherapy treatment compared to standard usual care in gynecological cancer survivors with urinary incontinence. A total of 44 participants will be randomized to receive either physiotherapy or standard usual care (wait-list for physiotherapy). Baseline and post-treatment evaluations will be realized by a physiotherapist.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Education, pelvic floor muscle exercises with biofeedback and home exercises.
Other names: Pelvic floor rehabilitation
Time frame: Baseline to 2-week post-treatment evaluation
To determine acceptability by assessing adherence to exercises.
Time frame: Baseline to 2-week post-treatment evaluation
To determine feasibility by evaluating attrition.
Time frame: Baseline to 2-week post-treatment
7-day voiding schedule will be used to evaluate the reduction of urinary leakage.
Time frame: Baseline to 2-week post-treatment evaluation
To explore changes in pelvic floor symptoms (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form ranging from 0 to 21), a high score represents high pelvic floor symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline to 2-week post-treatment evaluation
To explore changes in pelvic floor muscle function at rest and during contraction (dynamometry).
Time frame: Baseline to 2-week post-treatment evaluation
To explore changes in pelvic floor muscle function at rest and during contraction (ultrasound).
Time frame: Baseline to 2-week post-treatment evaluation
To explore changes in sexual function (Female Sexual Function Index ranging from 2 to 36), a low score represents a low sexual function.
Time frame: Baseline to 2-week post-treatment evaluation
To explore changes in quality of life (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire ranging from 0 to 100), a high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / quality of life represents a high quality of life and a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.
Time frame: Baseline to 2-week post-treatment evaluation
To determine patient self-reported improvement (Patient's Global Impression of Change ranging from "very much worse" to "very much improved" on a 7-point scale.
Time frame: Baseline to 2-week post-treatment evaluation
To document any adverse events.
Université de Sherbrooke
Other
Pilot Study Examining Feasibility and Effects of Physiotherapy Treatment Compared to Standard Usual Care in Gynecological Cancer Survivors With Urinary Incontinence
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05971303
Gynecologic Cancer
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT04007770
Breast Diseases, Breast Neoplasms
Basking Ridge, New Jersey, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03515993
Gynecologic Cancer
Graz, Austria
View Trial DetailsNCT04753086
Gynecologic Cancer
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
View Trial Details