Faculty of Physical Therapy , Beni-Suef University
Banī Suwayf, 62511, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT06795841
Objective: To compare low-level laser therapy and myofascial release in reducing inflammation and functional recovery in critically ill COVID-19 patients with 3-month home-based telerehabilitation assessment.
Participants: One hundred two COVID-19 patients aged 45-60 years randomized into three groups: low-level laser therapy (n=34), myofascial release (n=34), and control (n=34).
Intervention: Intensive care unit-based low-level laser therapy, myofascial release, or standard physiotherapy with medical treatment. Following discharge, all participants received 12 weeks of multidimensional home-based telerehabilitation incorporating patient education, breathing exercises, inspiratory muscle training, limb strengthening, aerobic training, and trunk control.
Outcomes: Primary outcomes were ferritin and D-dimer levels. Secondary outcomes included C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, white blood cell counts, maximum inspiratory pressure, six-minute walk test, bilateral knee strength, dyspnea perception, fatigue severity, and oxygen saturation. All measured at baseline, discharge, and 3 months. Intensive care unit length of stay and physiotherapy sessions measured at discharge.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me45 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Banī Suwayf, 62511, Egypt
One hundred-two COVID 19 patients (56 men and 46 women) aged 45-60 years were recruited from the Al Kasr Al Ainy teaching hospitals ICUs. All patients were informed of the study, risks, and expected benefits before signing the informed consent form. The low-level laser therapy group (LLLT) consisted of 34 patients, who received low-level laser therapy, traditional physiotherapy, medical treatment and the myofascial release group (MR) consisted of 34 patients, who received myofascial release techniques, traditional physiotherapy, and medical treatment; and the control group (C) consisted of 34 patients, who received traditional physiotherapy and medical treatment only. After discharge all patients received home multidimension telerehabilitation program.
The eligibility criteria were as follows: (I) Patients aged from 45 to 60 years old, (II) Diagnosed by CT or PCR as positive COVID 19, (III) Moderate cases of COVID-19 (According to CO-RA DS Scale).22 (IV) on low flow rate oxygen supply Exclusion criteria were (I) patients on Invasive Mechanical Ventilation, (II) Hemodynamically Unstable with inotropic support; (III) Septic Shock; (IV) ICU admission less than 24 h.
(V) physician termination of physiotherapy; and (VI) fever with causes other than chest infection, (VII) severe electrolyte imbalance, acute venous thromboembolism without therapeutic anticoagulation for over 48 h, (VIII) Unstable Atrial fibrillation, or severe tachycardia compared to baseline.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
It was applied for upper respiratory tract over tonsils, trachea, and main bronchi (bilaterally parasternal at the level of angle of Lewis), upper and lower lung, and at cubital vein
technique was applied from supine position, with both hands cupping both diaphragmatic domes
included traditional chest physiotherapy (postural drainage, percussion and shaking), stretching exercise
Following ICU discharge, all patients participated in a 12-week structured home multidimensional telerehabilitation program delivered via videoconferencing (Zoom or Microsoft Teams) under the remote supervision of a physiotherapist. Sessions were conducted three times per week and incorporated patient education, breathing exercises, inspiratory muscle training (30 -50% MIP), strengthening of upper and lower limb muscle groups (50- 70 % 1RM), aerobic training (40- 60% HRR), and trunk control activities. Safety monitoring was emphasized throughout, with patients instructed to use a pulse oximeter before, during, and after each session. Adherence was assessed by session attendance, exercise diaries, and weekly therapist follow-up
Time frame: at baseline and at discharge from ICU up to 14 days and at 3 month of discharge
(1) ferritin
Time frame: at baseline and at icu discharge up to 14 days and at 3 months of discharge
Time frame: at baseline and at ICU discharge up to 14 days and at 3 months of discharge
(3) CRP
Time frame: at baseline and at icu discharge up to 14 days and at 3 months of discharge
(4) Interleukin-6
Time frame: at baseline and at icu discharge up to 14 days and at 3 months of discharge
(5) white blood cell counts.
Time frame: at baseline and at icu discharge upto 14 days and at 3 months of discharge
Maximum inspiratory pressure
Time frame: at baseline and at ICU discharge up to 14 days and at 3 months of discharge
The 6-minute walk test (6-MWT) was conducted in the intensive care unit under the supervision
Time frame: at baseline and at ICU discharge up to 14 days and at 3 months of discharge
It was assessed using visual analogue scale: Zero represented deep, comfortable breathing; 10 represented inability to breathe deeply. Scores were recorded on a graduated ruler
Time frame: at baseline and at ICU discharge, up to 14 days and at 3 months of discharge
It was assessed during a six-minute walking test: modified Borg scale (0-10) assessed dyspnea: zero = no dyspnea; 10 = maximum dyspnea ever experienced
Time frame: at baseline and at ICU discharge up to 14 days and at 3 months of discharge
portable intra-hospital patient monitor measured hemoglobin oxygen saturation in arterial blood.
Time frame: at ICU discharge up to 2weeks
Time frame: at baseline and at ICU discharge up to 14 days and at 3 months of discharge
The Fatigue Severity Scale:Nine-item scale with 7-point Likert responses (1=strongly disagree to 7=strongly agree). Total score represents arithmetic mean of item responses.
Time frame: at baseline and at ICU discharge upto 14 days and at 3 months of discharge
Quadriceps strength
Beni-Suef University
Other
Photobiomodulation Therapy Versus Integrated Myofascial Release Therapy Techniques In Patients With Moderate COVID 19 Inside Intensive Care Unit, With a Complementary Home Telerehabilitation
Acronym: PBM in COVID19
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04603729
COVID 19 Disease, COVID-19
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT04533347
COVID 19 Disease, Communicable Diseases
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04763681
COVID-19, Coronaviridae Infections
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT04747249
COVID-19, Coronaviridae Infections
Caen, France
View Trial Details