Percutaneous Ventricular Assist System
DevicePercutaneous Ventricular Assist System provides intraoperative circulatory support during high-risk PCI.
NCT Number: NCT06639321
The primary purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the percutaneous left ventricular assist system versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for circulatory support during high-risk PCI.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year–90 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin City, Changchun, China
This prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled clinical trial of the Percutaneous Ventricular Assist System is designed to measure the incidence of freedom from major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 30 days after PCI.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Percutaneous Ventricular Assist System provides intraoperative circulatory support during high-risk PCI.
ECMO provides intraoperative circulatory support during high-risk PCI.
Time frame: 30 days after procedure
MACCE defined as death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and target vessel revascularization.
Time frame: 30 days, 90 days after procedure
Rate of all-cause death during the trial.
Time frame: 30 days, 90 days after procedure
Rate of patients with myocardial infarction during the trial.
Time frame: 30 days, 90 days after procedure
Rate of patients with stroke during the trial.
Time frame: 30 days, 90 days after procedure
Rate of patients with target vessel revascularization during the trial.
Time frame: 30 days, 90 days after procedure
Rate of patients with unplanned cardiac operation or thoracic or abdominal vascular operation or vascular operation for limb ischemia during the trial.
Time frame: 30 days, 90 days after procedure
Rate of patients with acute kidney injury during the trial.
Time frame: 30 days, 90 days after procedure
Rate of patients with cardiopulmonary resuscitation or ventricular arrhythmia requiring cardioversion during the trial.
Time frame: 30 days, 90 days after procedure
Rate of patients with increasing in aortic insufficiency by more than one grade during the trial.
Time frame: 30 days, 90 days after procedure
Rate of patients with severe hypotension during the trial. Severe hypotension defined as systolic blood pressure or augmented diastolic pressure (whichever is greater) <90 mmHg for ≥5 min requiring inotropic/pressor medications or IV fluid.
Time frame: 90 days after procedure
Rate of patients with freedom from major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) during the trial. MACCE defined as death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and target vessel revascularization.
Time frame: During procedure
Hemodynamic support success is defined as (1) Percutaneous mechanical circulatory assist device was delivered and activated successfully, and withdrawn from the body successfully; (2) Hemodynamic stability during procedure (defined as mean arterial pressure (MAP) <60mmHg for no more than 10 minutes during the PCI procedure and additional pressor medication is not required).
Time frame: mmediately after procedure
Technical success is defined as (1) Hemodynamic support success; (2) Coronary revascularization success (defined as ①residual stenosis <30% after coronary stent implantation; ②restoration of TIMI anterograde flow of II or III).
Time frame: Immediately after procedure
Procedure success is defined as (1) Technical success; (2) Freedom from serious in-hospital procedural complications
Time frame: 30 days, 90 days after procedure
LVEF is assessed at 30 days, 90 days after procedure, and compared to baseline
Time frame: 30 days, 90 days after procedure
Cardiac function is evaluated based on NYHA classification and compared to baseline. New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification includes four categories(CLASS I to CLASS IV, higher class mean a worse outcome) based on physical activity limitations.
Time frame: Immediately after procedure
Performance evaluation includes the catheter pump and extracorporeal control device (For each assessment: 1-10 points;1=worst, 5=moderate, 10=best).
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Shanghai NewMed Medical Co., Ltd.
Industry
The Safety and Efficacy of the Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist System Versus ECMO for Intraoperative Circulatory Support During High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI): a Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07740330
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Bouge, Namur, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT07740044
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Taizhou, Jiangsu, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07730528
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
View Trial DetailsNCT07727135
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Angina Pectoris
Aalborg, Denmark
View Trial Details