Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Kristina Fanucci, MD
CONTACT
Kristina Fanucci, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT07222215
The goal of this research study is to compare a combination of two drugs, capecitabine and elacestrant to capecitabine alone as a treatment for advanced estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. This study is designed for participants with cancer that has previously stopped responding to medication in the class of therapy called CDK 4/6 inhibitors, including palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclb.
The names of the study drugs involved in this study are:
* Elacestrant (a type of selective estrogen receptor degrader) * Capecitabine (a type of fluoropyrimidine antimetabolite)
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Kristina Fanucci, MD
CONTACT
Kristina Fanucci, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
This is a Phase II, multi-center, open-label, randomized study comparing a combination of two drugs, capecitabine and elacestrant, to capecitabine alone as a treatment for advanced estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer. This study is designed for participants with cancer that has previously stopped responding to medication in the class of therapy called CDK 4/6 inhibitors, including palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclb.
Participants will be randomized into one of two study groups: Arm A Capecitabine and Elacestrant versus Arm B Capecitabine alone. Randomization means a participants is placed into a study group by chance.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved capecitabine as a treatment option for advanced estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer.
The FDA has approved elacestrant for metastatic breast cancer with an ESR1 mutation. Elacestrant is not FDA approved for participants whose cancer does not have ESR1 mutation and it is possible elacestrant may not be as effective or effective at all in participants whose tumors do not have an ESR1 mutation.
The FDA has not approved Elacestrant and Capecitabine to be given together.
The research study procedures include screening for eligibility, in-clinic visits, questionnaires, blood tests, urine tests, Computerized Tomography (CT) scans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans, and electrocardiograms (ECGs).
It is expected that about 297 people will take part in this research study.
Stemline, a Menarini Group Company, is supporting this research study by providing the study drugs, elacestrant, and funding. This study is also being supported by Johns Hopkins University on behalf of the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (TBCRC).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Note: No HIV testing is required at screening unless mandated by local health Authority.
Note: Participants should remain on antiviral therapy throughout study intervention and follow local guidelines for HBV antiviral therapy post completion of study intervention.Hepatitis B screening tests are not required unless:
Note: Participants must have completed curative antiviral therapy at least 4 weeks before allocation.
Hepatitis C screening tests are not required unless:
Exclusion criteria
Both men and women of all races and ethnic groups are eligible for this trial.
A fluoropyrimidine carbamate, tablet taken orally, per standard of care.
Other names: Xeloda
A selective estrogen receptor degrader, tablet taken orally, per standard of care
Other names: RAD1901, Elacestrant Dihydrochloride, RAD1901 - 2 HCl, C30H40Cl2N2O2
Time frame: Tumor measurements are repeated every 3 cycles (each cycle is 21 days) for the first 9 cycles. After cycle 9 tumor measurements will be performed every 4 cycles.
PFS based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the time from study randomization to disease progression per RECIST 1.1 or death. Patients alive without disease progression are censored at the date of last disease evaluation.
Time frame: Tumor measurements are repeated every 3 cycles (each cycle is 21 days) for the first 9 cycles. After cycle 9 tumor measurements will be performed every 4 cycles.
PFS based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the time from study randomization to disease progression per RECIST 1.1 or death. Patients alive without disease progression are censored at the date of last disease evaluation.
Time frame: Follow up or other contact every 2 months for 24 months until time of second progression, then every 6 months for 5 years
Overall Survival (OS) based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause or censored at date last known alive.
Time frame: Tumor measurements are repeated every 3 cycles (each cycle is 21 days) for the first 9 cycles. After cycle 9 tumor measurements will be performed every 4 cycles
The objective response rate is defined as the rate of patients with a complete response or partial response, calculated using RECIST 1.1. The best overall response is the best response recorded from the start of treatment until disease progression/recurrence.
Time frame: Tumor measurements are repeated every 3 cycles (each cycle is 21 days) for the first 9 cycles. After cycle 9 tumor measurements will be performed every 4 cycles
The clinical benefit rate is defined as the rate of patients with a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) ≥24 weeks, calculated using RECIST 1.1.
Time frame: Follow up or other contact every 2 months for a total of 24 months or until progressive disease
PFS2 based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the time from study randomization to second disease progression, according to RECIST 1.1, or death after first progression.
Time frame: Follow up or other contact every 2 months for 24 months until time of second progression, then every 6 months for 5 years
Overall Survival (OS) based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause or censored at date last known alive.
Time frame: Tumor measurements are repeated every 3 cycles (each cycle is 21 days) for the first 9 cycles. After cycle 9 tumor measurements will be performed every 4 cycles
The objective response rate is defined as the rate of patients with a complete response or partial response, calculated using RECIST 1.1.
Time frame: Tumor measurements are repeated every 3 cycles (each cycle is 21 days) for the first 9 cycles. After cycle 9 tumor measurements will be performed every 4 cycles
The clinical benefit rate is defined as the rate of patients with a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) ≥24 weeks, calculated using RECIST 1.1.
Time frame: Follow up or other contact every 2 months for a total of 24 months or until progressive disease
PFS2 based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the time from study randomization to second disease progression, according to RECIST 1.1, or death after first progression.
Time frame: Assessment will occur once per cycle (each cycle is 21 days) for the first 9 cycles, then once every other cycle starting with cycle 10
Assessment of toxicities and lab values categorized and graded according to CTCAE v5.0
Time frame: Once every 2 cycles (each cycle is 21 days) for the first 4 cycles, every 3 months for months 3-12 on trial, then every 6 months for months 12+ on trial
evaluation with PRO-CTCAE and FACT-ES survey instruments
Time frame: Follow up or other contact every 2 months for 24 months until time of second progression, then every 6 months for 5 years
Overall Survival (OS) based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause or censored at date last known alive.
Time frame: Tumor measurements are repeated every 3 cycles (each cycle is 21 days) for the first 9 cycles. After cycle 9 tumor measurements will be performed every 4 cycles
PFS based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the time from study randomization to disease progression per RECIST 1.1 or death. Patients alive without disease progression are censored at the date of last disease evaluation.
Time frame: Follow up or other contact every 2 months for a total of 24 months or until progressive disease
PFS2 based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the time from study randomization to second disease progression, according to RECIST 1.1, or death after first progression.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Kristina A. Fanucci
Other
A Phase II Multi-Center Open-label Randomized Study of CAPecitabine in Combination With ELAcestrant Versus Capecitabine Alone in Advanced Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer (CAPELA)
Acronym: CAPELA
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07340541
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06062498
Advanced Breast Cancerv, Breast Diseases
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06525766
Anatomic Stage IV Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Breast Diseases
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06867484
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Boca Raton, Florida, United States
View Trial Details