Selegiline Transdermal System
DrugEMSAM 6mg, 9mg, or 12mg Flexible Dose- 1 patch/24 hours- 12 Week Study
Other names: EMSAM
NCT Number: NCT00531947
The primary purpose of your participation in this study is to help answer the following research question: Whether 12-week administration of EMSAM (selegiline transdermal system) is safe and effective for the treatment of adolescents (aged 12 through 17 years) with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me12 year–17 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Dr. Nelson Handal, Dothan, Alabama, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
EMSAM 6mg, 9mg, or 12mg Flexible Dose- 1 patch/24 hours- 12 Week Study
Other names: EMSAM
Matching Placebo for EMSAM 6mg, 9mg, or 12mg Flexible Dose- 1 patch/24 hours- 12 Week Study
Other names: Matching Placebo Transdermal System
Time frame: baseline and 12 Weeks
A summary of the primary efficacy outcome measure, Children's Depression Rating Scale (CDRS-R) Total Score, as reported by the Child, at Week 12 (EOS), by treatment assigned, is shown for the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, with the last observation carried forward (LOCF) in time.
CDRS-R total raw scores range from 17(minimum) 113(maximum). A lower score indicates a lower likelihood of a depressive disorder, a higher score indicates a higher likelihood of a depressive disorder. Two subscales are summed to calculate a total score: Evaluated Symptom Area and Ratings of Observed Nonverbal Behavior.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 Weeks
A summary of the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) at baseline and Week 12 (EOS), by treatment assigned, is shown for the mITT population with LOCF. The CGI-s is the clinician's assessment of severity of illness (depression). Scores range from 1(minimum) to 7(maximum). A lower score indicates lower illness severity, a higher score indicates higher levels of illness severity.
Time frame: 12 Weeks
A summary of the Clinicians Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Score at Week 12 (EOS), by treatment assigned, is shown for the mITT population with LOCF. The CGI-c assesses the overall change in the severity of illness (depression). The clinician rates the subject's change based on a bipolar scale from 1(minimum; "Very much improved") to 7(maximum; "Very much worse"). A lower score indicates lower levels of depression as compared to baseline, a higher score indicates higher levels of depression as compared to baseline. A score of 4 ("Unchanged") indicates no change in illness compared to baseline. The scale is not calculated as a statistical change score; the clinician rates their impression of change overall.
Time frame: 12 Weeks
A summary of the CGI-C percent responders at Week 12 (EOS), by treatment assigned, is shown for the mITT population with LOCF. CGI-C responders were defined as a score of 1 or 2 at the end of the study. A non-responder was defined as a score of ≥3 at end of study. Maximum score is 100%.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 Weeks
A summary of a secondary efficacy outcome measure, Children's Depression Rating Scale (CDRS-R) Total Score (Scored by Parent/Other), at Week 12 (EOS), by treatment assigned, is shown for the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, with the last observation carried forward (LOCF) in time.
CDRS-R (Parent/Other) total raw scores range from 14 (minimum) 94 (maximum). A lower score indicates a lower likelihood of a depressive disorder, a higher score indicates a higher likelihood of a depressive disorder. One subscale is summed to calculate a total score: Evaluated Symptom Area. Ratings of Observed Nonverbal Behavior subscale is not included in Parent/Other total calculation.
Time frame: 12 Weeks
A summary of a secondary efficacy outcome measure, Children's Depression Rating Scale (CDRS-R) Total Score (Best Description), at Week 12 (EOS), by treatment assigned, is shown for the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, with the last observation carried forward (LOCF) in time.
Best Description ratings are used when ratings based on interviews with different sources (e.g., child, parent, other ratings) differ for a particular symptom. The evaluator must determine which of these ratings most accurately represents the current affective functioning of the child, and circle that rating in the Best Description of Child Column.
CDRS-R (Best Description)total raw scores range from 17(minimum) 113(maximum). A lower score indicates a lower likelihood of a depressive disorder, a higher score indicates a higher likelihood of a depressive disorder. Two subscales are summed to calculate a total score: Evaluated Symptom Area and Ratings of Observed Nonverbal Behavior.
Time frame: 12 Weeks
A summary of the secondary efficacy outcome measure, Children's Depression Rating Scale (CDRS-R) Total Score (Scored by Child), at Week 12 (EOS), by treatment assigned, is shown for the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population with observed cases (w/OC).
CDRS-R (Child) total raw scores range from 17(minimum) 113(maximum). A lower score indicates a lower likelihood of a depressive disorder, a higher score indicates a higher likelihood of a depressive disorder. Two subscales are summed to calculate a total score: Evaluated Symptom Area and Ratings of Observed Nonverbal Behavior.
Time frame: 12 Weeks
A summary of a secondary efficacy outcome measure, Children's Depression Rating Scale (CDRS-R) Total Score (Scored by Parent/Other), at Week 12 (EOS), by treatment assigned, is shown for the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population with observed cases (w/OC).
CDRS-R (Parent/Other) total raw scores range from 14 (minimum) 94 (maximum). A lower score indicates a lower likelihood of a depressive disorder, a higher score indicates a higher likelihood of a depressive disorder. One subscale is summed to calculate a total score: Evaluated Symptom Area. Ratings of Observed Nonverbal Behavior subscale is not included in Parent/Other total calculation.
Time frame: 12 Weeks
A summary of a secondary efficacy outcome measure, Children's Depression Rating Scale (CDRS-R) Total Score (Best Description), at Week 12 (EOS), by treatment assigned, is shown for the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, with observed cases (w/OC).
Best Description ratings are used when ratings based on interviews with different sources (e.g., child, parent, other ratings) differ for a particular symptom area. The evaluator must determine which of these ratings most accurately represents the current affective functioning of the child, and circle that rating in the Best Description of Child Column.
CDRS-R (Best Description) total raw scores range from 17(minimum) 113(maximum). A lower score indicates a lower likelihood of a depressive disorder, a higher score indicates a higher likelihood of a depressive disorder. Two subscales are summed to calculate a total score: Evaluated Symptom Area and Ratings of Observed Nonverbal Behavior.
Time frame: 12 Weeks
Number of physical examination findings that were normal at screening, but abnormal at end of study are presented. Four subjects receiving placebo and four subjects receiving EMSAM had abnormal findings on physical examination at the end of study that were normal at screening.
Time frame: 12 Weeks
A summary of a secondary safety outcome measure, Urinalysis (Change from Baseline), by treatment assigned, is shown for the safety population. Mean changes from baseline are provided for PH and specific gravity.
Time frame: 12 Weeks
Summary mean change in heart rate measured in beats per minute (beats/min or BPM) (supine, standing, and orthostatic change)results for all subjects are presented.
Time frame: 12 Weeks
Summary mean change in blood pressure (systolic/diastolic) measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg) (supine, standing, and orthostatic change)results for all subjects are presented.
Time frame: 12 Weeks
A summary of a secondary safety outcome measure, 12 Lead electrocardiogram (ECG) (Change from Baseline) measured in milliseconds (msec), by treatment assigned, is shown for the safety population. Mean change from Baseline in PR interval, QRS duration, QT interval, and QTc (Bazett and Fridericia corrections) interval are presented.
Time frame: 12 Weeks
A summary of a secondary safety outcome measure, 12 Lead electrocardiogram (ECG) (Change from Baseline)Ventricular Heart Rate measured in beats per minute(beats/min or BPM), by treatment assigned, is shown for the safety population. Mean change from baseline is presented.
Time frame: 12 Weeks
A summary of a secondary safety outcome measure, Hematology (Change from Baseline), by treatment assigned, is shown for the safety population. Mean change from Baseline in ABS BASOPHILS (X10^9/L), ABS EOSINOPHILS (X10^9/L), ABS LYMPHOCYTES (X10^9/L), ABS MONOCYTES (X10^9/L), and ABS NEUTROPHILS (X10^9/L) are presented.
Time frame: 12 Weeks
A summary of a secondary safety outcome measure, Hematology - Hematocrit(HCT)(Change from Baseline), by treatment assigned, is shown for the safety population.
Time frame: 12 Weeks
A summary of a secondary safety outcome measure, Hematology - Hemoglobin(HGB)(Change from Baseline), by treatment assigned, is shown for the safety population.
Time frame: 12 Weeks
A summary of a secondary safety outcome measure, Hematology - Red Blood Cell (RBC)(Change from Baseline), by treatment assigned, is shown for the safety population.
Somerset Pharmaceuticals
Industry
A Phase IV, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Flexible Dose Study of the Safety and Efficacy of EMSAM in Adolescents With Major Depression
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05386329
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03688139
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
White Plains, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04747873
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT03716869
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial Details