NCT Number: NCT00004799
Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Acellular and Whole-Cell Pertussis Vaccines
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the safety and efficacy of acellular 2-component vs. acellular multicomponent vs. whole-cell pertussis vaccine vs. placebo in infants living in Sweden.
II. Compare the relative protection of each vaccine against atypical or subclinical pertussis infection.
III. Analyze possible laboratory correlates to vaccine protection.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
2 month–3 month
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
About this study
PROTOCOL OUTLINE: This is a randomized, double-blind study. Patients are stratified by participating institution.
The first group of infants receives a vaccine composed of inactivated pertussis toxin (iPT) and filamentous hemagglutin (FHA).
The second group receives a vaccine containing iPT, FHA, pertactin, agglutinogen 2, and agglutinogen 3.
The third group receives a whole-cell pertussis vaccine. The fourth group receives a diphtheria-tetanus vaccine as the control. All vaccines are given as an intramuscular injection, at 2-3, 4, and 6 months of age.
Close surveillance of infants and families continues for 2-3 years.
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
PROTOCOL ENTRY CRITERIA:
--Population Characteristics--
- Infants aged 2 months at planned date of first vaccination
- No prior pertussis confirmed by culture
- The following do not exclude: Down syndrome Prematurity Healthy babies vaccinated according to chronological age Recent pertussis exposure Seizures in parent or sibling Sudden infant death in sibling Close relative with history of anaphylaxis or allergy Close relative with history of strong reaction to vaccination
--Patient Characteristics--
- Age: Under 3 months
- Renal: No renal failure
- Other: No prior gammaglobulin No requirement for immunosuppressives, e.g., HIV infection No manifest immunosuppression No serious chronic illness associated with failure to thrive No cardiac disease No progressive neurologic disease No uncontrolled epilepsy or infantile spasms No parental language or communication barrier
Treatment and study plan
diphtheria-tetanus vaccine
BiologicalSponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Nih
Collaborators
- National Bacteriological Laboratory
Registry information
Important dates
- Study start
- 1991
- First posted
- Feb 25, 2000
- Registry last updated
- Jun 24, 2005
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Intravenous Pertussis Immune Globulin in Patients With Severe Childhood Pertussis Infection
NCT00004422
Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
View Trial DetailsPhase III Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Acellular and Whole-Cell Pertussis Vaccines
NCT00004800
Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
View Trial DetailsRisk Assessment of Community Spread of Multiple Endemic Infectious Diseases in a One Health Perspective
NCT07358910
Adenophorea Infections, Adenoviridae Infections
Phnom Penh, Cambodia
View Trial DetailsEstablishing a Controlled Human Infection Model of Bordetella Pertussis
NCT05136599
Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
View Trial Details