Vorolanib
DrugGiven by mouth
NCT Number: NCT03583086
This is a two-agent, open-label, non-randomized, Phase 1/2 dose escalation and dose expansion study of combinatorial oral vorolanib plus infusional nivolumab in patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer naïve to checkpoint inhibitor therapy, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer who have progressed on checkpoint inhibitor therapy, Small Cell Lung Cancer ( who have progressed on platinum-based chemotherapy, and thymic carcinoma.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Stanford Cancer Institute, Palo Alto, California, United States
Primary Objectives:
Secondary Objectives:
Exploratory Objectives:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts:
Exclusion criteria
Note: Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) whose disease is controlled (per investigator judgment) at trial entry are not excluded.
Given by mouth
Given by IV
Time frame: At 28 days
Maximum tolerated dose for vorolanib daily combined with 240mg nivolumab every 2 weeks based on 3+3 dose escalation design. When 2 out of 6 patients at one dose experienced dose limiting toxicity, lower dose will be used.
We have specified the phase I and phase II populations as study arms; note outcome measures are then distinct for each arm, with the phase I arm intended to assess safety (MTD), and the phase 2 arm intended to assess efficacy, as typical for phase I-II studies. Thus, for each outcome, only the phase I cohort is included in the analysis population, or only the phase II cohort is including in the analysis population, as relevant to the outcome measure.
Time frame: Up to 1 year.
Antitumor activity will be assessed by objective response rate. Best response is determined as complete response(CR), partial response(PR), stable disease and progressive disease based on per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Objective response rate is the percentage of patients who had a CR or PR.
We have specified the phase I and phase II populations as study arms; note outcome measures are then distinct for each arm, with the phase I arm intended to assess safety (MTD), and the phase 2 arm intended to assess efficacy, as typical for phase I-II studies. Thus, for each outcome, only the phase I cohort is included in the analysis population, or only the phase II cohort is including in the analysis population, as relevant to the outcome measure.
Time frame: Up to 1 year.
Antitumor activity will be assessed by progression free survival. Progression is termined per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Progression free survival (PFS) is defined as time from on treatment to disease progression or death (whicever comes first). Those without progression and alive were censored at last follow up. Kaplan-meier method is used to estimate the median survival time.
We have specified the phase I and phase II populations as study arms; note outcome measures are then distinct for each arm, with the phase I arm intended to assess safety (MTD), and the phase 2 arm intended to assess efficacy, as typical for phase I-II studies. Thus, for each outcome, only the phase I cohort is included in the analysis population, or only the phase II cohort is including in the analysis population, as relevant to the outcome measure.
Time frame: Up to 1 year
Duration of best response among patients who responsed to the treatment. Best response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). The duration of response was estimated from the first date of best overall response of a complete (CR) or partial response (PR) to the date of disease progression or death, using the Kaplan-Meier method.
We have specified the phase I and phase II populations as study arms; note outcome measures are then distinct for each arm, with the phase I arm intended to assess safety (MTD), and the phase 2 arm intended to assess efficacy, as typical for phase I-II studies. Thus, for each outcome, only the phase I cohort is included in the analysis population, or only the phase II cohort is including in the analysis population, as relevant to the outcome measure.
Time frame: Up to 1 year
Antitumor activity will be assessed by disease control rate. Best response (complete response,CR; partial response, PR;stable disease , SD; or progression,PD) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Disease control rate is the percentage of patients who had a CR,PR or SD.
We have specified the phase I and phase II populations as study arms; note outcome measures are then distinct for each arm, with the phase I arm intended to assess safety (MTD), and the phase 2 arm intended to assess efficacy, as typical for phase I-II studies. Thus, for each outcome, only the phase I cohort is included in the analysis population, or only the phase II cohort is including in the analysis population, as relevant to the outcome measure.
Time frame: Up to 2 years.
Antitumor activity will be assessed by overall survival. Overall survial is defined as the time from on treatment to death. Those alive were censored at last follow up. Kaplan-meier method is used to estimate the median overall survival time.
We have specified the phase I and phase II populations as study arms; note outcome measures are then distinct for each arm, with the phase I arm intended to assess safety (MTD), and the phase 2 arm intended to assess efficacy, as typical for phase I-II studies. Thus, for each outcome, only the phase I cohort is included in the analysis population, or only the phase II cohort is including in the analysis population, as relevant to the outcome measure.
Time frame: Up to 1 year
Antitumor activity will be assessed by correlation between the biomarkers and clinical outcomes. This is a exploratory end point. To assess the effects of combinatorial treatment on specific pharmacodynamic and pharmacogenetic biomarkers, including but not limited to circulating levels of serum CSF1 and VEGF, protein expression using CyTOF, and multiplex immunofluorescence.
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
Other
Phase 1/2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Preliminary Activity of Nivolumab in Combination With Vorolanib in Patients With Refractory Thoracic Tumors
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03517488
Adenocarcinoma, Adenoma
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01385722
Adenoma, Bronchial Neoplasms
Stanford, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07179341
Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases, Lymphatic Diseases
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT00010257
Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases, Lymphatic Diseases
Aurora, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details