Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02040844

Phase III Cat-PAD Follow-on Study

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the continued effectiveness and safety of Cat-PAD in cat allergic subjects for up to five years after the start of administration of treatment. The study is an optional follow-up study to a phase III double-blind, placebo controlled, Cat-PAD study; no further investigational product is administered.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • previously completed clinical study CP007 [NCT01620762]

Exclusion criteria

  • started allergen therapy since completing CP007
  • Institutionalised due to a legal or regulatory order

Treatment and study plan

Received Cat-PAD Treatment 1 in Study CP007 [NCT01620762]

Drug

Received Cat-PAD Treatment 2 in Study CP007 [NCT01620762]

Drug

Received Cat-PAD Treatment 3 in Study CP007 [NCT01620762]

Drug

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Combined Score (CS) Consisting of TRSS/8+Allergy Medication Score[AMS])

    Time frame: 1 year after completing CP007

    The primary endpoint was the mean Combined Score (CS) in Cat-PAD treatment groups compared with the mean CS in the placebo group. This was assessed one year after completing the original study (CP007).

    CS = Total Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom Score (TRSS) + Allergy Medication Score (AMS). Eight symptoms are defined in the TRSS, 4 nasal symptoms: runny nose, sneezing; blocked nose and itchy nose and 4 ocular symptoms: itchy eyes; watery eyes; red eyes and sore eyes. Each symptom was rated in severity on a score of 0-3 (0=absent, 3=severe) and the TRSS was divided by the number of symptoms to provide an average score per symptom of 0-3.

    AMS was scored from 0 (no allergy rescue medication use per day) to 3 (at least one dose of systemic corticosteroid per day). The AMS score was not additive, and therefore the maximum AMS was 3 and the maximum CS was 6.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean TRSS

    Time frame: 1 year after completion of CP007

    Mean Total Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom Score (TRSS) in Cat-PAD treatment groups compared with placebo.

    Eight symptoms are defined in the TRSS, 4 nasal symptoms: runny nose, sneezing; blocked nose, and itchy nose and 4 ocular symptoms: itchy eyes; watery eyes; red eyes, and sore eyes. Each symptom was rated in severity on a score of 0-3 (0. absent; 1. mild, barely noticeable; 2. moderate, annoying/troublesome; 3. severe, very annoying/very troublesome), therefore TRSS could range from 0 to 24. Higher TRSS reflected more severe symptom scores. Symptoms were scored daily for a period of approximately 3 weeks one year after completing the first study (CP007).

  2. Mean Component Scores of the TRSS (Nasal)

    Time frame: 1 year after completion of CP007

    TNSS (Total nasal symptom score) was the sum of all the nasal symptom scores (runny nose; sneezing; blocked nose; itchy nose) and could range from 0 to 12. Higher TNSS reflected more severe symptoms.

    Subjects rated the severity of each symptom over the last 24 hours as follows: 0. absent; 1. mild, barely noticeable; 2. moderate, annoying/troublesome; 3. severe, very annoying/very troublesome. Symptoms were scored daily for a period of approximately 3 weeks 1 year after completing the original CP007 study.

  3. Mean Component Scores of the TRSS (Ocular)

    Time frame: 1 year after completion of CP007

    Mean daily Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) in Cat-PAD treatment groups compared to placebo groups

    Eight symptoms are defined in the TRSS, 4 nasal symptoms: runny nose, sneezing; blocked nose, and itchy nose and 4 ocular symptoms: itchy eyes; watery eyes; red eyes, and sore eyes. TOSS was the sum of all the ocular symptom scores (itchy eyes; watery eyes; red eyes; sore eyes) and could range from 0 to 12. Higher TOSS reflected more severe symptoms.

    Subjects rated the severity of each symptom over the last 24 hours as follows: 0. absent; 1. mild, barely noticeable; 2. moderate, annoying/troublesome; 3. severe, very annoying/very troublesome. Symptoms were scored daily for a period of approximately 3 weeks one year after completing the original CP007 study

  4. Mean Allergy Medication Score (AMS)

    Time frame: 1 year after completion of CP007

    Mean AMS (Allergy medication score) in Cat-PAD treatment groups compared with placebo groups.

    The use of rhinoconjunctivitis rescue medications was recorded by the subject for a period of 21 days, on a daily basis just before bedtime, approximately 1 year after completing the original CP007 study. Rescue medication use was scored based on a previously published system as follows: 0 = no allergy rescue medication used per day; 0.5 = at least one dose of antihistamine eye drops used per day; 1 = at least one dose of oral antihistamine used per day; 2 = at least one dose of intranasal corticosteroid used per day; 3 = at least one dose of systemic corticosteroid used per day. The score was according to the highest level of rescue medication used and was not additive.

  5. Mean RQLQ Score

    Time frame: 1 year after completion of CP007

    The RQLQ (Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire) was completed by subjects one year after the completion of the previous study (CP007).

    The RQLQ is a validated method of assessing quality of life and has 28 questions in seven domains (activity limitation, sleep problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, non-nasal/eye symptoms, practical problems and emotional function). Subjects recalled how their rhinoconjunctivitis had been during the last week and responded to each question on a seven-point scale (0 = no impairment, 6 = maximum impairment). The questions were equally weighted, and the RQLQ score was the mean of the 28 questions and could range from zero to six.

    A higher score indicated greater impact on quality of life and thus a low score indicated a better outcome.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Circassia Limited

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

An Optional Prospective Follow-on Study to Evaluate the Continued Efficacy and Safety of Cat-PAD in Cat Allergic Subjects up to Five Years After the Administration of Treatment

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Jan 20, 2014
Registry last updated
Jun 15, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.