Aficamten (CK-3773274) (5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg and 20 mg)
DrugAficamten (CK-3773274) tablets administered orally
NCT Number: NCT05767346
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of aficamten (CK-3773274) compared with metoprolol succinate in adults with symptomatic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Instituto de Pesquisa Clinica de Campinas - IPECC, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Aficamten (CK-3773274) tablets administered orally
Placebo for aficamten (CK-3773274) administered orally
Metoprolol succinate tablets administered orally
Placebo for metoprolol succinate administered orally
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Effect of aficamten compared with metoprolol succinate on exercise capacity in patients with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM). Exercise capacity was determined through changes in peak oxygen uptake (pVO2) after 24 weeks of treatment. pVO2 was measured by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) on a treadmill or bicycle. A higher pVO2 indicates better cardiorespiratory fitness.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Effect of aficamten compared with metoprolol succinate on NYHA Functional Classification
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Effect of aficamten compared with metoprolol succinate on participant health status was measured by change in KCCQ-CSS. The KCCQ is a patient-reported outcome designed to assess the physical limitations, symptoms, self-efficacy, quality of life, and social limitation of patients with heart failure symptoms. The CSS is the sum of the physical limitation score and the total symptom score. The KCCQ-Clinical Symptoms Score (KCCQ-CSS) is scored on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical functioning and symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Effect of aficamten on mass of the heart as compared with metoprolol succinate
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Effect of aficamten on size of the heart as compared with metoprolol succinate
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Effect of aficamten on NT-proBNP as compared with metoprolol succinate. For change in NT-proBNP from baseline to Week 24, the log transformed proportional change up to Week 24 was analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) then the estimate was back transformed to obtain the ratio.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Effect of aficamten on post-Valsalva LVOT-G as compared with metoprolol succinate
Cytokinetics
Industry
A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Aficamten Compared to Metoprolol in Adults With Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Acronym: MAPLE-HCM
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07529938
Aortic Stenosis, Subvalvular, Aortic Valve Disease
Zhengzhou, Henan, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05186818
Aortic Stenosis, Subvalvular, Aortic Valve Disease
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06338202
Aortic Stenosis, Subvalvular, Aortic Valve Disease
London, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07168655
Aortic Stenosis, Subvalvular, Aortic Valve Disease
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial Details