Ganaxolone
Drug200 mg and 225 mg capsules; target dose 1800 mg/day dosed 900mg 2x/day
Other names: gnx
NCT Number: NCT01963208
The study will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of an investigational drug-ganaxolone - on partial seizure frequency in adults with epilepsy taking a maximum of 3 antiepileptic medications (AEDs).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
This is a 2-cohort study comprised of 2 phases in each cohort. Phase 1 is a double-blind (DB) phase followed by Phase 2, an open-label phase. Cohort 1 will provide tolerability, safety, and PK information for ganaxolone 1200 milligram per day (mg/day), 1800 mg/day and placebo. Cohort 2 will investigate the efficacy, tolerability and safety of ganaxolone 1800 mg/day compared to placebo. Cohort 1 (N= approximately 50) will enroll into a 67-week study comprised of a 4-week prospective baseline period plus 4 week retrospective baseline followed by two treatment phases: a 9-week randomized DB placebo-controlled treatment phase followed by a 52-week open label treatment phase. Cohort 2 (N=150) will enroll into a 72-week study comprised of a 8-week prospective baseline period followed by two treatment phases: a 14-week randomized DB placebo-controlled treatment phase followed by a 52-week open label treatment phase.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
200 mg and 225 mg capsules; target dose 1800 mg/day dosed 900mg 2x/day
Other names: gnx
placebo
Other names: pbo
Time frame: Baseline and Week 14
Seizure frequency was based on the number of seizures per 28 days, calculated as the number of seizures over the time interval multiplied by 28 and divided by the number of days in the interval. Baseline 28-day seizure frequency was calculated as the number of seizures in the Baseline period (≤ 56 days) divided by the number of days with available seizure data in the Baseline period and multiplied by 28. Baseline was defined as non-missing value of last assessment before first dose. Primary analysis was performed using a rank analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).
Time frame: Up to Week 14
A 50% responder was a participant who experienced at least a 50% decrease in 28-day seizure frequency compared to Baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 14
Baseline number of seizure free days per 28-day period was calculated as: the number of seizure free days in the entire Baseline period (<=56 days) divided by the number of days with available seizure data in the baseline period and multiplied by 28. Post-Baseline number of seizure free days per 28-day period was calculated as: the number of seizure free days in the entire treatment period divided by the number of days with available seizure data in the treatment period and multiplied by 28. Change from Baseline in number of seizure free days per 28-day period from Baseline was calculated as: Post-Baseline number of seizure free days per 28-day period minus Baseline number of seizure free days per 28-day period. Baseline was defined as non-missing value of last assessment before first dose.
Time frame: At Week 14
The CGI-I scale is a clinician-rated 7-point Likert scale used to assess the degree to which the participant's epilepsy symptoms have changed relative to Baseline. It was rated as 1. "very much improved"; 2. "much improved"; 3. "minimally improved"; 4. "no change"; 5. "minimally worse"; 6. "much worse"; 7. "very much worse". Higher scores indicated worse condition. Baseline was defined as non-missing value of last assessment before first dose.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 2 to Week 14
Seizure frequency was based on the number of seizures per 28 days, calculated as the number of seizures over the time interval multiplied by 28 and divided by the number of days in the interval. Baseline 28-day seizure frequency was calculated as the number of seizures in the Baseline period (≤ 56 days) divided by the number of days with available seizure data in the Baseline period and multiplied by 28. Baseline was defined as non-missing value of last assessment before first dose.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 14
Seizure frequency was based on the number of seizures per 28 days, calculated as the number of seizures over the time interval multiplied by 28 and divided by the number of days in the interval. Baseline 28-day seizure frequency was calculated as the number of seizures in the Baseline period (≤ 56 days) divided by the number of days with available seizure data in the Baseline period and multiplied by 28. Baseline was defined as non-missing value of last assessment before first dose. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 2 to Week 14
Seizure frequency was based on the number of seizures per 28 days, calculated as the number of seizures over the time interval multiplied by 28 and divided by the number of days in the interval. Baseline 28-day seizure frequency was calculated as the number of seizures in the Baseline period (≤ 56 days) divided by the number of days with available seizure data in the Baseline period and multiplied by 28. Baseline was defined as non-missing value of last assessment before first dose. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 2 to Week 14
Baseline number of seizure free days per 28-day period was calculated as: the number of seizure free days in the entire Baseline period (≤ 56 days) divided by the number of days with available seizure data in the Baseline period and multiplied by 28. Post-Baseline number of seizure free days per 28-day period was calculated as: the number of seizure free days in the entire treatment period divided by the number of days with available seizure data in the treatment period and multiplied by 28. Change from Baseline in number of seizure free days per 28-day period from Baseline was calculated as: Post-Baseline number of seizure free days per 28-day period minus Baseline number of seizure free days per 28-day period. Baseline was defined as non-missing value of last assessment before first dose.
Time frame: Up to Week 14
Percentage of participants who had reductions of ≥ 80%, ≥ 60%, ≥ 40%, and ≥ 20% in 28-day seizure frequency from Baseline is presented. A responder is an individual whose reduction of percent change from Baseline in 28-day seizure frequency was ≥ 50%. Baseline was defined as non-missing value of last assessment before first dose.
Time frame: Week 2 to Week 14
Percentage of participants who had reductions of ≥ 80%, ≥ 60%, ≥ 40%, and ≥ 20% in 28-day seizure frequency from Baseline is presented. A responder is an individual whose reduction of percent change from Baseline in 28-day seizure frequency was ≥ 50%. Baseline was defined as non-missing value of last assessment before first dose.
Time frame: Week 2 to Week 14
Percentage of participants who completed the study without any seizures is presented
Time frame: Up to Week 14
Percentage of participants who experienced at least one 28-day seizure free period is presented
Time frame: Up to Week 14
The longest period of time seizure-free was defined as the percent of the longest seizure-free period (days) divided by the days with available seizure data, and then multiplied by 100%.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 14
Seizure frequency was based on the number of seizures per 28 days, calculated as the number of seizures over the time interval multiplied by 28 and divided by the number of days in the interval. The analysis was conducted for Partial-Onset Seizure (POS) only which included seizure subtypes: Complex partial seizures (CPS), secondarily generalized tonic-clonic (SGTC) seizures, simple partial seizure with motor/observable component (SPS-Motor) and Simple partial seizure (SPS) without motor/observable component. Baseline 28-day seizure frequency was calculated as the number of seizures in the Baseline period (≤ 56 days) divided by the number of days with available seizure data in the Baseline period and multiplied by 28. Baseline was defined as non-missing value of last assessment before first dose.
Time frame: Week 8 and Week 14
The PGI-I scale was a 7-point Likert scale completed by the Patient or Caregiver representing the degree to which the participant's epilepsy symptoms had changed relative to Baseline. It was rated as 1. "very much improved"; 2. "much improved"; 3. "minimally improved"; 4. "no change"; 5. "minimally worse"; 6. "much worse"; 7. "very much worse". Higher score indicated worse condition. Baseline was defined as non-missing value of last assessment before first dose.
Time frame: At Week 8
The CGI-I scale is a clinician-rated 7-point Likert scale used to assess the degree to which the participant's epilepsy symptoms have changed relative to Baseline. It was rated as 1. "very much improved"; 2. "much improved"; 3. "minimally improved"; 4. "no change"; 5. "minimally worse"; 6. "much worse"; 7. "very much worse". Higher scores indicated worse condition. Baseline was defined as non-missing value of last assessment before first dose.
Marinus Pharmaceuticals
Industry
A Multicenter, Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Ganaxolone as Adjunctive Therapy for Adults With Drug-Resistant Partial-Onset Seizures Followed by Long-term Open-Label Treatment
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06377930
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00512317
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00280059
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Bruges, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT00537238
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Duffel, Belgium
View Trial Details