Crotalinae (pit viper) equine immune F(ab)2
BiologicalAnavip with Anavip Maintenance Therapy
Other names: Anavip
NCT Number: NCT00636116
The purpose of this study is to establish if F(ab)2 antivenom (Anavip) is safe for crotalinae envenomation. Confirm its effectiveness in preventing the occurrence of delayed coagulopathies and compare the safety and efficacy with Fab antivenom (CroFab) in patients with Crotalinae envenomation.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me2 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Fewer than 200,000 crotaline envenomations occur annually in the US.Crotaline venoms contain a broad variety of toxins, venom variability and injection quantity among individual snakes and across species result in broadly variable patient presentations. Clinical consequences of crotaline envenomation include local and systemic effects, both of which may progress for hours to days.The best studied systemic consequence is coagulopathy, which may in its complexity mimic disseminated intravascular coagulation. Platelet and clotting disorders respond rapidly to administration of polyvalent antivenom.
Crotaline viper envenomation in the United States is treated with one of two licensed products: Wyeth Antivenin (Crotalidae) Polyvalent (Polyvalent), or CroFab® (antivenin Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab, ovine). In recent years, both of these products have been in critically short supply. Use of Wyeth Polyvalent has been associated with a greater than 75% incidence of adverse reactions, including acute type 1 and delayed type 2 immune reactions.These phenomena are an inherent risk in the use of whole immunoglobulin. CroFab´s low molecular weight creates a pharmacokinetic mismatch with crotaline venom which leds to a recurrent venom effects.
Anavip is pharmacologically and pharmacokinetically different.Because of the elimination of the Fc portion of the immunoglobulin molecule, Anavip is expected to produce far fewer adverse reactions than seen with whole immunoglobulin antivenoms and unlike Fab molecules, F(ab)2 molecules exceed the size threshold for renal clearance and thus are expected to remain in circulation for a significantly longer time and substantially reduce the incidence of recurrent coagulopathy.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Anavip with Anavip Maintenance Therapy
Other names: Anavip
CroFab with CroFab Maintenance Therapy
Other names: CroFab
Time frame: Study Day 5 (±/- 1 day), Study Day 8 (±/- 1 day)
Time frame: Study Day 5 (+/- 1 day) and Study Day 8 (+/- 1 day)
Instituto Bioclon S.A. de C.V.
Industry
A Comparison of Anavip® and CroFab® in the Treatment of Patients With Crotalinae Envenomation: A Randomized, Prospective, Blinded, Controlled, Comparative, Multicenter Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01284855
Bites and Stings, Chemically-Induced Disorders
Bharatpur, Chitwan, Nepal
View Trial DetailsNCT00868309
Bites and Stings, Blood Coagulation Disorders
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00811239
Bites and Stings, Chemically-Induced Disorders
Hanoi, Vietnam
View Trial DetailsNCT00804011
Bites and Stings, Chemically-Induced Disorders
Chandigarh, Uttarakhand, India
View Trial Details