Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00636116

Phase 3 Multicenter Comparative Study to Confirm Safety and Effectiveness of the F(ab)2 Antivenom Anavip.

The purpose of this study is to establish if F(ab)2 antivenom (Anavip) is safe for crotalinae envenomation. Confirm its effectiveness in preventing the occurrence of delayed coagulopathies and compare the safety and efficacy with Fab antivenom (CroFab) in patients with Crotalinae envenomation.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

2 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Fewer than 200,000 crotaline envenomations occur annually in the US.Crotaline venoms contain a broad variety of toxins, venom variability and injection quantity among individual snakes and across species result in broadly variable patient presentations. Clinical consequences of crotaline envenomation include local and systemic effects, both of which may progress for hours to days.The best studied systemic consequence is coagulopathy, which may in its complexity mimic disseminated intravascular coagulation. Platelet and clotting disorders respond rapidly to administration of polyvalent antivenom.

Crotaline viper envenomation in the United States is treated with one of two licensed products: Wyeth Antivenin (Crotalidae) Polyvalent (Polyvalent), or CroFab® (antivenin Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab, ovine). In recent years, both of these products have been in critically short supply. Use of Wyeth Polyvalent has been associated with a greater than 75% incidence of adverse reactions, including acute type 1 and delayed type 2 immune reactions.These phenomena are an inherent risk in the use of whole immunoglobulin. CroFab´s low molecular weight creates a pharmacokinetic mismatch with crotaline venom which leds to a recurrent venom effects.

Anavip is pharmacologically and pharmacokinetically different.Because of the elimination of the Fc portion of the immunoglobulin molecule, Anavip is expected to produce far fewer adverse reactions than seen with whole immunoglobulin antivenoms and unlike Fab molecules, F(ab)2 molecules exceed the size threshold for renal clearance and thus are expected to remain in circulation for a significantly longer time and substantially reduce the incidence of recurrent coagulopathy.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men and women 2 to 80 years of age
  • Presenting for emergency treatment of pit viper bite
  • Informed consent document read and signed by patient (or parent/legal guardian)

Exclusion criteria

  • Current use of any antivenom, or use within the last month
  • Current participation in a clinical drug study, or participation within the last month
  • Positive urine or blood pregnancy test at screening
  • Breast-feeding
  • Allergy to horse serum, sheep serum, or papaya
  • Underlying medical conditions that significantly alter platelet count or fibrinogen; thrombocytopenia, hemophilia, familial dysfibrinogenemia, leukemia
  • Use of any medication expected to affect platelet count, coagulation factors or fibrinogen: chemotherapeutic agents, warfarin, heparin
  • No clinical indications of snake bite requiring antivenom for treatment

Treatment and study plan

Crotalinae (pit viper) equine immune F(ab)2

Biological

Anavip with Anavip Maintenance Therapy

Other names: Anavip

Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab, ovine

Biological

CroFab with CroFab Maintenance Therapy

Other names: CroFab

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence rate of patients experiencing coagulopathy during the follow-up phase of the study. Absolute Platelet levels < 150,000/mm3. Absolute Fibrinogen levels < 150 mg/dL. Clinical coagulopathy requiring additional antivenom.

    Time frame: Study Day 5 (±/- 1 day), Study Day 8 (±/- 1 day)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparison between groups of: Percentage of patients who experience venonemia. Absolute platelet level measured Lowest absolute platelet level measured Absolute fibrinogen level Lowest absolute fibrinogen level

    Time frame: Study Day 5 (+/- 1 day) and Study Day 8 (+/- 1 day)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Instituto Bioclon S.A. de C.V.

Industry

Collaborators

  • Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
  • University of Arizona

Registry information

Official study title

A Comparison of Anavip® and CroFab® in the Treatment of Patients With Crotalinae Envenomation: A Randomized, Prospective, Blinded, Controlled, Comparative, Multicenter Study

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2011
Study completion
2012
First posted
Mar 14, 2008
Registry last updated
Jan 10, 2012

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.