Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02229396

Phase 3 28-Week Study With 24-Week and 52-week Extension Phases to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Exenatide Once Weekly and Dapagliflozin Versus Exenatide and Dapagliflozin Matching Placebo

Study D5553C0003 is a 28-week, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter, Phase 3 efficacy and safety study with 24-week and 52-week extension phases of simultaneous administration of exenatide once weekly (EQW) 2 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg once daily (QD) compared to EQW 2 mg alone and dapagliflozin 10 mg QD alone in patients with Type 2 diabetes who have inadequate glycemic control on metformin.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–130 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Research Site, Baja, Hungary

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Has a diagnosis of T2DM.
  • Has HbA1c of 8.0% to 12.0%, inclusive, at Visit 1 and Visit 2.
  • Treated with a stable dose of metformin ≥1500 mg/day for at least 2 months prior to Screening.

Exclusion criteria

  • FPG ≥280 mg/dL (15.6 mmol/L).
  • Serum calcitonin concentration ≥40 pg/mL (≥40 ng/L) at Visit 1 (Screening)
  • Clinically significant abnormal free T4 values or patients needing initiation or adjustment of thyroid treatment according to the investigator.
  • Abnormal thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) value at Screening will be further evaluated by free T4.Patients with clinically significant abnormal free T4 values will be excluded.
  • Known active proliferative retinopathy.
  • History of, or currently have, acute or chronic pancreatitis, or have triglyceride concentrations ≥500 mg/dL (≥5.65 mmol/L) at Visit 1
  • History or presence of inflammatory bowel disease or other severe GI diseases, particularly those which may impact gastric emptying, such as gastroparesis or pyloric stenosis.
  • History of gastric bypass surgery or gastric banding surgery, or either procedure is planned during the time period of the study. Current use of gastric balloons is also excluded.

Treatment and study plan

Exantide with Dapagliflozin

Drug

2 mg weekly suspension injection and 10 mg Dapagliflozin

Exentide

Drug

2 mg

Dapagliflozin

Drug

10 mg once daily Dapagliflozin

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 28

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 28

    To compare the change from baseline to Week 28 in HbA1c between exenatide once weekly (EQW) 2 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg administered simultaneously compared to EQW 2 mg alone and dapagliflozin 10 mg alone.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 28

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 28

    To compare the change from baseline to Week 28 in body weight between exenatide once weekly (EQW) 2 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg administered simultaneously compared to EQW 2 mg alone and dapagliflozin 10 mg alone.

  2. Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline to Week 28

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 28

    To compare the change from baseline to Week 28 in fasting plasma glucose between exenatide once weekly (EQW) 2 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg administered simultaneously compared to EQW 2 mg alone and dapagliflozin 10 mg alone.

  3. Change From Baseline to Week 28 in 2-hour Postprandial Glucose After a Standard Meal Tolerance Test

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 28

    To compare the change from baseline to Week 28 in 2-hour postprandial glucose after a standard Meal Tolerance Test between exenatide once weekly (EQW) 2 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg administered simultaneously compared to EQW 2 mg alone and dapagliflozin 10 mg alone.

  4. Percentage of Patients Achieving Weight Loss ≥5.0% at Week 28

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 28

    To compare the percentage of patients achieving weight loss ≥5.0% at 28 weeks between exenatide once weekly (EQW) 2 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg administered simultaneously compared to EQW 2 mg alone and dapagliflozin 10 mg alone.

  5. Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline to Week 2

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 2

    To compare the change from baseline to Week 2 in fasting plasma glucose between exenatide once weekly (EQW) 2 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg administered simultaneously compared to EQW 2 mg alone and dapagliflozin 10 mg alone.

  6. Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <7% at Week 28

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 28

    To compare the percentage of patients achieving HbA1c <7% at 28 weeks between exenatide once weekly (EQW) 2 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg administered simultaneously compared to EQW 2 mg alone and dapagliflozin 10 mg alone.

  7. Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 28

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 28

    To compare the change from baseline to Week 28 in systolic blood pressure between exenatide once weekly (EQW) 2 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg administered simultaneously compared to EQW 2 mg alone and dapagliflozin 10 mg alone.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

AstraZeneca

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A 28-week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Phase 3 Study With a 24-week Extension Phase Followed by a 52-week Extension Phase to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Simultaneous Administration of Exenatide Once Weekly 2 mg and Dapagliflozin Once Daily 10 mg Compared to Exenatide Once Weekly 2 mg Alone and Dapagliflozin Once Daily 10 mg Alone in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on Metformin

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2017
First posted
Sep 1, 2014
Registry last updated
Dec 31, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.