Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07598903

Pharmacy-based Opportunistic Atrial Fibrillation Screening Integrated With Emergency Services (NUMAPLUS-FA)

This study evaluates the feasibility and fidelity of an opportunistic atrial fibrillation (AF) screening programme conducted in 38 community pharmacies in Seville (Spain), using the Kardias® 6-lead portable ECG device, coordinated with the emergency medical services centre Salud Responde (CES 061) and primary care physicians. Eligible participants are individuals aged 65 years or older without a prior AF diagnosis who attend a participating pharmacy for any routine purpose. The screening consists of a 30-second ECG recording performed by a trained community pharmacist. Positive or indeterminate results are transmitted in real time to Salud Responde for clinical validation and referral to primary care. The study is evaluated using the RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance). The primary outcome is protocol fidelity, measured by the Implementation Adherence Grade (IAG). The study is part of the NUMAPLUS project, funded by INTERREG VI-A España-Portugal (POCTEP 2021-2027), co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

65 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Centro de Emergencias Sanitarias 061

Seville, SEVILLA, 41092, Spain

Location contact

María José Luque-Hernández, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

683511613

About this study

STUDY DESIGN This is a prospective, single-cohort, type-1 effectiveness-implementation hybrid study conducted within the NUMAPLUS project (INTERREG VI-A España-Portugal, POCTEP 2021-2027, co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund). This design was selected because external evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of the Kardias® device is sufficient to justify its deployment, while uncertainty persists regarding the organisational conditions, care pathways and economic incentives required for its sustainable integration into the Andalusian community pharmacy network. The primary focus is on implementation outcomes; clinical outcomes related to atrial fibrillation screening are collected as secondary endpoints. The study is reported in accordance with the Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) guideline.

SETTING The study is conducted in 38 community pharmacies in the province of Seville affiliated with the Real e Ilustre Colegio Oficial de Farmacéuticos de Sevilla (RICOFS), selected by voluntary participation following an open invitation. Eligibility criteria for pharmacies required stable internet connectivity for access to the Numaplus application, completion of pre-study training, and absence of concurrent participation in another cardiovascular screening programme. Priority was given to pharmacies with 24-hour or 12-hour opening schedules. Geographic coverage targets at least three urban health zones per province and at least one semi-urban or rural zone per healthcare management area.

The study articulates three coordination levels: (1) the community pharmacy as the point of patient recruitment and screening; (2) Salud Responde (CES 061) as the clinical validation, risk stratification and real-time coordination node; and (3) the primary care physician as the responsible party for definitive diagnosis and initiation of treatment.

TRAINING OF PARTICIPATING PHARMACISTS Prior to the recruitment period, all enrolled pharmacists completed a structured training programme accredited by the Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública (EASP) and the Agencia de Calidad Sanitaria de Andalucía (ACSA). The programme was delivered entirely online in asynchronous modality between 23 March and 13 April 2026 (10 hours total) through the EASP Moodle platform. It comprised four learning units: (1) epidemiological basis and scientific rationale for opportunistic AF screening; (2) detection protocol, radial pulse palpation technique, and interpretation of Kardias® device outputs; (3) data entry in the Numaplus platform, risk classification and patient communication within the pharmacy-Salud Responde circuit; and (4) ethical and legal framework, informed consent procedures, and data protection requirements. Certification required completion of all practical activities and a minimum score of 7 out of 10 on the final knowledge assessment.

INTERVENTION

The screening protocol comprises five sequential operational phases aligned with the RE-AIM framework:

Phase 1 (Reach): Opportunistic invitation during dispensing or consultation, without prior appointment. The pharmacist records the monthly denominator of unique patients aged 65 years or older using pharmacy management software. Reasons for refusal are recorded anonymously.

Phase 2 (Adoption): Following written informed consent, the case is opened in the Numaplus application. The pharmacist records current symptoms (palpitations, chest pain, dyspnoea, syncope), oral anticoagulant therapy status, and the CHA₂DS₂-VA score (0-6), adopted per the 2024 ESC Guidelines for AF Management in replacement of CHA₂DS₂-VASc.

Phase 3 (Implementation): The Kardias® 6-lead portable device is applied for a 30-second ECG recording (maximum 3 attempts). The device algorithm classifies the result as: Suspected AF / Sinus rhythm / Bradycardia / Tachycardia / Unclassified. Protocol fidelity is operationalised through the Implementation Adherence Grade (IAG). A performance-based financial incentive of 20 euros per complete and valid case is applied.

Phase 4 (Effectiveness): In case of suspected or indeterminate AF, the Numaplus platform automatically transmits a PDF containing the ECG tracing and clinical data to Salud Responde; simultaneously, the pharmacist places a direct call. The Salud Responde nurse applies a structured triage protocol: emergency 061 activation (heart rate >110 or <60 bpm or alarm symptoms), medium priority referral (haemodynamically stable suspected AF, primary care appointment within 72 hours), or low priority referral (unclassified tracing, scheduled ECG at primary care). Definitive AF diagnosis is confirmed by the primary care physician.

Phase 5 (Maintenance): Six-month telephone follow-up conducted by Salud Responde, assessing anticoagulation initiation and adherence, health-related quality of life (visual analogue scale 0-10), and major adverse events (ischaemic stroke, major bleeding, death).

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary analysis is precision-based, targeting 385 participants (operational target: 380, 10 per pharmacy). Categorical variables are reported as proportions with 95% confidence intervals (Clopper-Pearson); the IAG is estimated with an exact binomial 95% CI. Factors associated with low fidelity are explored by logistic regression. Missing data are handled by multiple imputation (MICE, 20 imputations) if below 15% under the MAR assumption. All analyses are conducted in R version 4.3 or higher.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 65 years or older
  • Attending a participating community pharmacy for any routine healthcare purpose
  • No prior documented or patient-reported diagnosis of atrial fibrillation
  • Capacity to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Confirmed prior diagnosis of atrial fibrillation
  • Implanted pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or other intracardiac device
  • Clinically evident haemodynamic instability requiring direct emergency 061 activation (active chest pain, severe dyspnoea, syncope)
  • Concurrent participation in another cardiac rhythm monitoring study
  • Inability to maintain the required position for a 30-second ECG recording

Treatment and study plan

Integrated pharmacy-based AF screening circuit

Other

A coordinated opportunistic screening model integrating community pharmacies, emergency medical services (Salud Responde, CES 061) and primary care physicians. The model comprises: opportunistic patient identification during routine pharmacy visits; 30-second ECG recording using the Kardias 6-lead portable device; real-time data transmission via the Numaplus platform; structured clinical triage by Salud Responde nursing staff; and referral to primary care for definitive diagnosis and treatment. Implementation strategies include a structured EASP-accredited online training programme, ongoing technical support, activity feedback reports and a performance-based financial incentive of 20 euros per complete valid case.

Other names: Numaplus digital platform, Salud Responde CES 061, Kardias 6-lead portable ECG device

Primary outcomes

  1. Implementation Adherence Grade (IAG)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

    Implementation Adherence Grade (IAG) Composite fidelity index expressed as the percentage of mandatory protocol items completed per screening case, calculated as (number of mandatory items completed / 5) × 100. The five mandatory items, each scored dichotomously as completed (1) or not completed (0) and weighted equally, are: (1) written informed consent obtained and documented; (2) minimum demographic data recorded; (3) complete CHA₂DS₂-VA score calculated; (4) successful 30-second ECG tracing obtained within a maximum of three attempts; and (5) documented contact with Salud Responde for all cases classified as suspected or indeterminate atrial fibrillation. The pharmacy-level and study-level IAG is the mean of individual case-level IAG values. Target value: ≥90%.

    Unit of Measure: Percentage of mandatory protocol items completed (single composite index).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Participation rate (Reach)

    Time frame: Monthly, through study completion, an average of 6 months

    Proportion of patients aged 65 years or older who accept screening divided by the monthly denominator of unique patients aged 65 years or older attending each pharmacy.

  2. Pharmacy-level adoption rate

    Time frame: At end of recruitment period (month 6)

    Number of pharmacies completing at least one valid screening divided by the number of invited pharmacies.

  3. Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) score

    Time frame: At end of recruitment period (month 6)

    Mean score of the 4-item AIM scale (range 1-5) measuring pharmacist acceptability of the screening programme.

  4. Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) score

    Time frame: At end of recruitment period (month 6)

    Mean score of the 4-item FIM scale (range 1-5) measuring pharmacist-perceived feasibility of the screening programme.

  5. Suspected AF detection rate.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

    Proportion of screened participants with Suspected AF classification by the Kardias device algorithm.

  6. Confirmed AF diagnosis rate.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

    Proportion of screened participants with confirmed AF diagnosis following primary care assessment.

  7. Linkage to Care rate

    Time frame: Up to 72 hours after positive or indeterminate screening result

    Proportion of participants with suspected or indeterminate AF who attend primary care appointment within the planned timeframe.

  8. Oral anticoagulation initiation rate

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after confirmed AF diagnosis

    proportion of participants with confirmed AF initiated on oral anticoagulation.

  9. Major adverse events at 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months after confirmed AF diagnosis

    Incidence of ischaemic stroke, major bleeding and death among participants with confirmed AF at 6-month follow-up.

  10. Refusal rate and reasons

    Time frame: Monthly, through study completion, an average of 6 months

    proportion of eligible patients who decline screening, with the main reason for refusal recorded anonymously.

  11. Programme sustainability intention

    Time frame: At end of recruitment period (month 6)

    Proportion of pharmacists reporting intention to continue the screening programme beyond project funding period, assessed through the sustainability block of the post-study questionnaire.

  12. Salud Responde coordination performance

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

    Operational indicators of the Salud Responde (CES 061) triage node, including median time from ECG transmission to clinical validation, distribution of triage decisions (emergency 061 activation, medium priority referral, low priority referral), and qualitative assessment of circuit barriers by the SR coordination team at end of study.

  13. 13a. Salud Responde Coordination. ECG transmission.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

    Median time from ECG transmission to Salud Responde clinical validation (minutes)

  14. Salud Responde coordination. Triage decission

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

    Distribution of Salud Responde triage decisions (percentage of cases in each category: emergency 061 activation / medium priority / low priority)

  15. SR circuit barrers

    Time frame: At end of study (month 6)

    Qualitative assessment of circuit barriers by Salud Responde coordination team (thematic categories)

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Jesús Antonio JC Carrillo-Castrillo, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+34 955006300

María José ML Luque-Hernández, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+34683511613

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centro de Emergencias Sanitarias 061 Andalucía

Other

Collaborators

  • Andalusian Regional Ministry of Health
  • Andalusian School of Public Health
  • Andaluz Health Service
  • Real e Ilustre Colegio Oficial de Farmacéuticos de Sevilla
  • University of Seville

Registry information

Official study title

Pharmacy-based Opportunistic Screening for Atrial Fibrillation Using a Portable ECG Device Integrated With Emergency Medical Services: a Prospective Type-1 Hybrid Implementation Study (NUMAPLUS Project)

Acronym: Numaplus_FA

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
May 20, 2026
Registry last updated
May 22, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.