Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00629122

Pharmacokinetics of Sublingual Versus Oral Tacrolimus in Patients Awaiting Kidney Transplantation

Tacrolimus (Prograf) belongs to a class of medications known as the calcineurin inhibitors. It is a maintenance drug that is used to prevent rejection in kidney, liver, and heart transplant recipients. Calcineurin inhibitors display high pharmacokinetic (the body's effects on a drug) variability and necessitate use of blood tests to ensure that adequate drug levels are present to maintain effectiveness and safety. Early after transplant or at times when tacrolimus cannot be taken by mouth, alternative routes of administration are sought. Although an intravenous (through the vein) product is available, it can be toxic to the kidneys and has been associated with allergic reactions. Drug delivery via the oral mucosa is an alternative method of systemic drug administration which offers an alternative when oral administration is impractical (gastrointestinal dysmotility, reduced drug absorption, intestinal failure, difficulty in swallowing, or in those with nausea or vomiting). Administration of tacrolimus by the sublingual route may allow for direct entry into the systemic circulation and bypasses problems associated with drug absorption and breakdown that take place in the small intestine.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Tacrolimus (Prograf) belongs to a class of medications known as the calcineurin inhibitors. It is a maintenance drug that is used to prevent rejection in kidney, liver, and heart transplant recipients. Calcineurin inhibitors display high pharmacokinetic (the body's effects on a drug) variability and necessitate use of blood tests to ensure that adequate drug levels are present to maintain effectiveness and safety. The amount of oral tacrolimus that is absorbed varies in all patient populations studied. Tacrolimus is metabolized or broken down for elimination by the liver and small intestine via cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4, CYP 3A5, and p-glycoprotein enzyme systems. Enzyme activity is affected by several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in an individuals genetic make-up and differences in expression may contribute to variations in tacrolimus pharmacokinetics. There are number of drug-drug interactions where concomitantly administered medications can increase or decrease this break down of tacrolimus. Early after transplant or at times when tacrolimus cannot be taken by mouth, alternative routes of administration are sought. Although an intravenous (through the vein) product is available, it can be toxic to the kidneys and has been associated with allergic reactions. Studies in lung transplant recipients have utilized sublingual (under the tongue) tacrolimus administration with successful outcomes. Drug delivery via the oral mucosa is an alternative method of systemic drug administration which offers an alternative when oral administration is impractical (gastrointestinal dysmotility, reduced drug absorption, intestinal failure, difficulty in swallowing, or in those with nausea or vomiting). Administration of tacrolimus by the sublingual route allows for direct entry into the systemic circulation and bypasses problems associated with drug absorption and breakdown that take place in the small intestine. In order to learn more about the possible role of sublingual tacrolimus among transplant recipients we will administer tacrolimus sublingually. In addition, we will evaluate differences in expression and bioactivity of SNP polymorphisms and their effects in tacrolimus pharmacokinetics. Patients awaiting kidney transplantation who are listed on the kidney transplant waiting list or those with upcoming living donor transplants at our center will be administered five doses of sublingual tacrolimus followed by five doses of oral tacrolimus. We will evaluate and then compare the pharmacokinetic characteristics of sublingual and oral tacrolimus administration among the study participants. The purpose of this study is to assess the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of tacrolimus after sublingual and oral administration. A secondary objective is to assess the drug-drug interaction between concomitant therapy with clotrimazole.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients awaiting kidney transplantation aged ≥ 18 years

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients concurrently treated with medications that interact with tacrolimus (other than clotrimazole)

Treatment and study plan

Tacrolimus (Arm B)

Drug

Study day 1 (9a): Initiate sublingual (SL) tacrolimus and clotrimazole troche x 5 doses; Study day 3 (9a): Collection of pharmacokinetic parameters around the 5th SL tacrolimus dose; Study day 3 (9p): Start washout period, no drug administration (tacrolimus, clotrimazole); Study day 5 (9p): End washout period; Study day 6 (9a): Initiate oral tacrolimus and clotrimazole troche x 5 doses; Study day 8 (9a): Collection of pharmacokinetic parameters around the 5th oral tacrolimus dose; Study day 15: Contact subject by telephone to assess for any adverse effects. To ensure that dietary intake does not affect the absorption profile of tacrolimus we will ensure that breakfast is given 15 minutes prior to drug administration on the days of pharmacokinetic assessment (study day 3 and 8).

Other names: Prograf

Clotrimazole Troche

Drug

Study day 1 (9a): Initiate sublingual (SL) tacrolimus and clotrimazole troche x 5 doses; Study day 3 (9a): Collection of pharmacokinetic parameters around the 5th SL tacrolimus dose; Study day 3 (9p): Start washout period, no drug administration (tacrolimus, clotrimazole); Study day 5 (9p): End washout period; Study day 6 (9a): Initiate oral tacrolimus and clotrimazole troche x 5 doses; Study day 8 (9a): Collection of pharmacokinetic parameters around the 5th oral tacrolimus dose; Study day 15: Contact subject by telephone to assess for any adverse effects. To ensure that dietary intake does not affect the absorption profile of tacrolimus we will ensure that breakfast is given 15 minutes prior to drug administration on the days of pharmacokinetic assessment (study day 3 and 8).

Other names: Mycelex

Tacrolimus (Arm A)

Drug

Study day 1 (9a): Initiate sublingual (SL) tacrolimus and nystatin suspension x 5 doses; Study day 3 (9a): Collection of pharmacokinetic parameters around the 5th SL tacrolimus dose; Study day 3 (9p): Start washout period, no drug administration (tacrolimus, nystatin); Study day 5 (9p): End washout period; Study day 6 (9a): Initiate oral tacrolimus and nystatin suspension x 5 doses; Study day 8 (9a): Collection of pharmacokinetic parameters around the 5th oral tacrolimus dose; Study day 15: Contact subjects by telephone to assess for any adverse effects. To ensure that dietary intake does not affect the absorption profile of tacrolimus we will ensure that breakfast is given 15 minutes prior to drug administration on the days of pharmacokinetic assessment (study day 3 and 8).

Other names: Prograf

Nystatin Suspension

Drug

Study day 1 (9a): Initiate sublingual (SL) tacrolimus and nystatin suspension x 5 doses; Study day 3 (9a): Collection of pharmacokinetic parameters around the 5th SL tacrolimus dose; Study day 3 (9p): Start washout period, no drug administration (tacrolimus, nystatin); Study day 5 (9p): End washout period; Study day 6 (9a): Initiate oral tacrolimus and nystatin suspension x 5 doses; Study day 8 (9a): Collection of pharmacokinetic parameters around the 5th oral tacrolimus dose; Study day 15: Contact subjects by telephone to assess for any adverse effects. To ensure that dietary intake does not affect the absorption profile of tacrolimus we will ensure that breakfast is given 15 minutes prior to drug administration on the days of pharmacokinetic assessment (study day 3 and 8).

Other names: Nystatin Swish and Swallow

Primary outcomes

  1. C0 (ng/mL)

    Time frame: Day 3 and Day 8, time 0 (before tacrolimus dose)

    Trough concentration

  2. Cmax

    Time frame: Day 3 and Day 8, at time of maximum concentration

    Maximum concentration (ng/mL)

  3. Tmax

    Time frame: Day 3 and Day 8, time of maximum concentration

    Time to Maximum concentration (hours)

  4. Estimated AUC 0-6

    Time frame: Day 3 and Day 8, calculated based on concentrations measured between hours 0 and 6

    Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve from 0-6 hours (mg-hr/L)

  5. Tacrolimus Powder Dissolution Time

    Time frame: Day 3, minutes to powder dissolution

    Tacrolimus Powder Dissolution Time during Sublingual Administration (minutes)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Drug Interactions and Genotypes

    Time frame: 2 weeks

    Impact of drug interaction between tacrolimus and clotrimazole troche vs. nystatin suspension. Evaluate genotype polymorphisms that influence CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and p-glycoprotein expression to determine impact on sublingual and oral tacrolimus delivery.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Sublingual Versus Oral Tacrolimus Administration in Patients Awaiting Kidney Transplantation

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2009
First posted
Mar 5, 2008
Registry last updated
Jun 12, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.