CHU de Bordeaux
Bordeaux, 33000, France
NCT Number: NCT02505386
In geriatric departments, physicians are faced with two difficulties, first the increasing number of infections caused by multiresistant bacteria, especially extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing enterobacteria strains and second, the poor venous access frequently encountered in elderly population. Giving antibiotics subcutaneously would be an interesting alternative, all the more as intramuscular injection is contraindicated in case the of anticoagulant therapy. Unfortunately, few data are available about subcutaneous (SC) administration. Ertapenem is a recent long-acting parenteral carbapenem indicated especially in the treatment of ESBL infection. Its subcutaneously administration has been tested in several studies in Intensive Care Units (ICU) and internal medicine wards with promising results regarding clinical and pharmacokinetics data.
An alternative to the IV Ertapenem administration is needed because of poor venous access and behavioural abnormalities commonly present in infected elderly population. Ertapenem is currently SC administrated in geriatric departments if no other option is available. Moreover elderly patients often present several comorbdities, polymedication, renal insufficiency, cachexia which may disturb antibiotics pharmacokinetics.
The aim of the study is to obtain pharmacokinetic data of SC and IV Ertapenem administration in elderly population, obtain PK/PD parameters adapted to time-dependent antibiotics (T%>MIC) and descriptive data of occurrence of adverse effects and evolution of signs of infection.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me75 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Bordeaux, 33000, France
ESBL infection incidence increases especially in elderly population (Observatoire National de l'Epidémiologie de la Résistance Bactérienne aux Antibiotiques (ONERBA) www.onerba.org). SC antibiotic route is sometimes the only option available for infected elderly patients (delirium, dementia or no venous access) and presents advantages like greater patient comfort, less nursing time and decrease hospital duration. Ertapenem has a relatively long half life (4 hours) compared to imipenem (1 hour) and a less broad spectrum. Two studies compared the ertapenem pharmacokinetics regarding IV or SC administration. The first concerned 6 patients admitted in ICU and the second 16 patients in internal medicine department. They found IV and SC administrations were equivalent considering that ertapenem antimicrobial activity was time dependent. In fact, a reduction of peak concentration and of time to peak concentration was observed in both studies, but the Area Under the Curve were similar especially the time spent over the Minimal Inhibitory Concentration. Both studies did not observe any severe adverse effects. Because of these promising results and despite not being approved yet, SC Ertapenem, is commonly used in geriatric department. This administration route is chosen when no other option is available, for instance in cases of behavioural disturbance and lack of venous access.
The objective of the investigators study is to confirm the pharmacokinetics data in elderly population known to present frequently renal insufficiency and denutrition and to document the occurrence of adverse effects and clinical evolution.
Patients over 75 receiving ertapenem for 48 hours (IV or SC) will be included. Ertapenem concentrations (H0, H+0.5h and H+2.5h) will be determined at steady state and described based on administration route. Systemic and local adverse effects will be collected during the treatment and infection evolution will be described.
Patients will be monitored during ertapenem treatment and for 45 days after the beginning of the treatment. Biological data will be obtained initially at inclusion (D3 after ertapenem beginning) and for 14 days (+/-10) after the beginning of the treatment (corresponding to end of treatment). Signs of infection evolution will be also monitored for 45 days (+/-10).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: 48 hours after ertapenem beginning
To determine and compare Area under the curve established from the minimal concentration, Maximal concentration n°1 (at the end of the infusion) and Maximal concentration n°2 (2 hours after the end of the infusion) between intravenous and subcutaneous (SC) routes
Time frame: 48 hours after ertapenem beginning
To assess the time spent over the minimal inhibitory concentration
Time frame: From the ertapenem beginning until 15 days after the end of the treatment
To assess and graduate the number of AE
Time frame: At the end of the treatment
To assess the efficacy of the treatment
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Other
Pharmacokinetics of Ertapenem Following Subcutaneous or Intravenous Infusion in Patients Aged Over 75 (PHACINERTA)
Acronym: PHACINERTA
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05978037
Infections, Malaria
Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT02231879
Agammaglobulinemia, Agranulocytosis
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05180110
Infections, Inflammation
Edinburgh, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT07598006
Infections, Inflammation
Nice, Alpes Maritimes, France
View Trial Details