Prism Research LLC dba Nucleus Network
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55114, United States
NCT Number: NCT04486625
This Phase 1 study is being conducted to evaluate the effect of severe renal impairment on the PK, safety and tolerability of Aztreonam-Avibactam. Results from this study along with previous renal impairment data from each of the Aztreonam-Avibactam components will be used to confirm the proposed dosing adjustment in severe renal impairment which was based on modelling/simulation.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55114, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
500/167 mg ATM/AVI loading infusion, followed by 1500/500 mg ATM/AVI extended loading infusion, then 1500/500 mg ATM/AVI maintenance dose infusion every 6 hours
Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.
AUC0-24,ss of ATM in Cohort 1 was calculated by 4*AUC0-tau (tau = 6 hours), where AUC0-tau was area under the concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval). AUC0-24,ss of ATM in Cohort 2 was calculated by 3*AUC0-tau (tau = 8 hours), where AUC0-tau was area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval).
Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.
The Cmax of ATM was observed directly from data.
Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.
AUC0-24,ss of AVI in Cohort 1 was calculated by 4*AUC0-tau (tau = 6 hours), where AUC0-tau was area under the concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval). AUC0-24,ss of AVI in Cohort 2 was calculated by 3*AUC0-tau (tau = 8 hours), where AUC0-tau was area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval).
Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.
The Cmax of AVI was observed directly from data.
Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.
The AUC0-tau was calculated by linear/log trapezoidal method. The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).
Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.
The Tmax was observed directly from data as time of first occurrence.
Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.
The Ctau was observed directly from data. The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).
Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.
The t1/2 was calculated by loge(2)/kel, where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log linear concentration time curve. Only those data points judged to describe the terminal log linear decline were used in the regression.
Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.
The CL was calculated by dose/AUC0-tau, where AUC0-tau was area under the concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).
Time frame: In Cohort 1, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, and 4-6 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion. In Cohort 2, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, and 6-8 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion.
The CLr was calculated by Ae0-tau/AUC0-tau, where Ae0-tau was cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine up to time tau and AUC0-tau was area under the plasma concentration time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).
Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.
The Vz was calculated by dose/(AUC0-tau*kel), where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve and AUC0-tau was area under the concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for the normal renal function group (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for the severe renal impairment group (Cohort 2).
Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.
Vss was calculated by CL*MRT, where CL was clearance and MRT was mean residence time.
Time frame: In Cohort 1, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, and 4-6 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion. In Cohort 2, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, and 6-8 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion.
The Ae0-tau was the sum of (urine concentration*sample volume). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).
Time frame: In Cohort 1, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, and 4-6 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion. In Cohort 2, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, and 6-8 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion.
The Ae0-tau was calculated by 100*Ae0-tau/dose, where Ae0-tau was cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine up to time tau. The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).
Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.
The UC0-tau was calculated by linear/log trapezoidal method. The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).A
Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.
The Tmax was observed directly from data as time of first occurrence.
Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.
The Ctau was observed directly from data. The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).
Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.
The t1/2 was calculated by loge(2)/kel, where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log linear concentration time curve. Only those data points judged to describe the terminal log linear decline were used in the regression.
Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.
The CL was calculated by dose/AUC0-tau, where AUC0-tau was area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to to time tau (the dosing interval). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).
Time frame: In Cohort 1, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, and 4-6 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion. In Cohort 2, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, and 6-8 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion.
The CLr was calculated by Ae0-tau/AUC0-tau, where Ae0-tau was cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine up to time tau and AUC0-tau was area under the plasma concentration time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).
Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.
The Vz was calculated by dose/(AUC0-tau*kel), where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve and AUC0-tau was area under the concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for the normal renal function group (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for the severe renal impairment group (Cohort 2).
Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.
Vss was calculated by CL*MRT, where CL was clearance and MRT was mean residence time.
Time frame: In Cohort 1, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, and 4-6 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion. In Cohort 2, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, and 6-8 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion.
The Ae0-tau was the sum of (urine concentration*sample volume). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).
Time frame: In Cohort 1, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, and 4-6 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion. In Cohort 2, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, and 6-8 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion.
The Ae0-tau was calculated by 100*Ae0-tau/dose, where Ae0-tau was cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine up to time tau. The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).
Time frame: Day 1 up to at least 28 days after last dose of study medication (maximum of 33 days).
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a product; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. A serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: (1) results in death; (2) is life threatening (immediate risk of death); (3) requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; (4) results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); (5) results in congenital anomaly/birth defect; or that is considered to be an important medical event. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study medication and up to at least 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. A severe AE is defined as a event interferes significantly with participant's usual function.
Time frame: Day 1 up to at least 28 days after last dose of study medication (maximum of 33 days).
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a product; the event attributed to the study medication. A serious AE is any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: (1) results in death; (2) is life threatening (immediate risk of death); (3) requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; (4) results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); (5) results in congenital anomaly/birth defect; or that is considered to be an important medical event. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study medication and up to at least 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. A severe AE is defined as a event interferes significantly with participant's usual function.
Time frame: Days 1 to 3
Categorical post-baseline vital signs included: (1) pulse rate: value less than (<) 40 beats per minute (bpm), lager than (>) 120 bpm; (2) supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP): value <50 mmHg, change of more than or equal to (>=) 20 mmHg increase, change of >=20 mmHg decrease; (3) supine systolic blood pressure (SBP): value <90 mmHg, change of >=30 mmHg increase, change of >=30 mmHg decrease.
Time frame: Days 1 to 3
Criteria for ECG abnormalities: maximum QT interval >500 milliseconds (msec); maximum QTc interval of >=450 msec to less than or equal to (<=) 480 msec, >480 msec, and >500 msec and a maximum change of <30 change<=60 or >60 msec from baseline; maximum QTcF (Fridericia's Correction) interval of >=450 msec to <=480 msec, >480 msec, and >500 msec and a maximum change of <30 change<=60 or >60 msec from baseline.
Time frame: Days 1 to 3
Following laboratory parameters were abnormal (without regard to baseline abnormality): hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophils, activated partial thromboplastin time, protein, urea nitrogen, creatinine, urate, urine glucose, and urine protein.
Pfizer
Industry
AN OPEN-LABEL, PARALLEL-GROUP, PHARMACOKINETIC STUDY OF MULTIPLE INTRAVENOUS DOSES OF AZTREONAM AND AVIBACTAM IN SUBJECTS WITH SEVERE RENAL IMPAIRMENT AND NORMAL RENAL FUNCTION
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01453218
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Barcelona, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT05936138
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06890208
Anxiety Disorders, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Hamburg, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT04876963
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Cardiovascular Diseases
Copenhagen, Denmark
View Trial Details