Prograf
DrugBrand: Prograf Capsules, 1.0mg Tacrolimus capsules containing white to off white powder equivalent to 1.0 mg of anhydrous tacrolimus are hard gelatin capsules with white opaque body and ivory capsules.
Other names: Brand
NCT Number: NCT01889758
The study is designed to compare the steady-state pharmacokinetics of Prograf (Brand) and the two most disparate generic formulations (Generic Hi and Generic Lo) in a fully replicated, 3-way cross-over study in stable kidney (n=36) and liver transplant (n=36) subjects.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
To identify the most disparate tacrolimus generic drug formulations among those currently approved in the United States. We will conduct systematic dissolution testing of the brand and all currently approved tacrolimus drug formulations using the FDA-recommended dissolution method. We propose to test and compare the 1mg capsule strength (3 production lots/ manufacturer). In addition, we will compare the different formulations in terms of potency, purity and other quality attributes. This work will be carried out in the GMP-compliant facilities of The University of Iowa Pharmaceuticals and the University of Colorado. Based on these studies the two most disparate generic tacrolimus formulations (Generic Hi and Generic Lo) will be selected and compared with the Brand (PrografR, Astellas, Deerfield, IL) in the clinical trial.
This is an open label, prospective, multicenter, randomized, replicate, six-period, three-sequence cross-over study to compare the steady state pharmacokinetics of PrografR to Generic Hi to Generic Lo in stable kidney and liver transplant subjects. The PK assessor will be blinded to the assigned treatment sequence and formulation. The person analyzing the levels and analyzing the results will be blinded to formulation sequence. Each subject will be randomized to one of the three sequences where Generic Hi and Generic Lo represent the two generics and B the brand, Prograf. The blood samples will be collected at C0 (before morning dose) and then 20, 40, 60(1hr), 80, 100, 120(2hr), 140, 160, 180(3hr) minutes, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 12 hour after dosing with each formulation. Adherence will be monitored by patient diary, pill counts, and MEMS cap. Safety and efficacy parameters will be monitored weekly.
This study will be carried out in full compliance with the rules of Good Clinical Practice (GCP) including development of an electronic database and monitoring plan.
Resulting pharmacokinetic parameters will be analyzed by a variety of pharmacokinetic tests such as narrower acceptance intervals, individual and scaled average bioequivalence was well as population pharmacokinetics.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Brand: Prograf Capsules, 1.0mg Tacrolimus capsules containing white to off white powder equivalent to 1.0 mg of anhydrous tacrolimus are hard gelatin capsules with white opaque body and ivory capsules.
Other names: Brand
Generic Hi: Generic tacrolimus Capsules, 1.0mg. Manufacturer to be determined (Aim 1).
Other names: Generic tacrolimus hi
Time frame: Day 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42
Ratio of C0, C12, AUC0-12h and Cmax and apply confidence interval (CI) testing at steady state of Prograf to generic Hi in stable kidney and liver transplant subjects
Time frame: Day 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42
Ratio of C0, C12, AUC0-12h and Cmax and apply confidence interval (CI) testing at steady state of Prograf to Generic Lo in stable kidney and liver transplant subjects.
Time frame: Day 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42
Ratio of C0, C12, AUC0-12h and Cmax and apply confidence interval (CI) testing at steady state of Generic Hi to Generic Lo in stable kidney and liver transplant subjects.
Time frame: Day 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42
Time frame: Day 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42
Time frame: Day 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42
Time frame: Day 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42
This is a pharmacokinetic comparison study, but safety data will be collected via adverse and serious adverse event reporting as these are the standard efficacy parameters in transplant studies.
Time frame: Day 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42
This is a pharmacokinetic comparison study, but efficacy will be measured by kidney/liver function or biopsy-proven acute rejection or graft loss.
University of Cincinnati
Other
Acronym: PK
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05077254
COVID-19, Coronaviridae Infections
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04965935
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT02555566
Kidney Transplant Recipients
Rouen, France
View Trial DetailsNCT01150487
Kidney Transplant Recipients, Living Donors
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial Details