NCT Number: NCT00158873
Pharmaco-Economic Study Of Ultiva In Intensive Care Unit(ICU)Subjects
The study will evaluate the pharmaco-economic consequences of the use of a remifentanil based regimen compared with a conventional sedative based regimen in terms of duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in ICU, difference in extubation time and use of concomitant sedative agents.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary location
GSK Investigational Site, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- ICU patients with an expected duration of mechanical ventilation for 2 to 3 days and requiring analgesia and sedation.
Exclusion criteria
- ICU patients resuscitated in the previous 24 hours, neurotrauma or expecting major surgery, not likely to survive of with limit care status.
Treatment and study plan
Lorazepam
DrugFentanyl
DrugMorphine
DrugRemifentanil
DrugPropofol
DrugOther names: midazolam, lorazepam, fentanyl, morphine, remifentanil
Primary outcomes
-
Health Outcome: Duration of time on mechanical ventilation
Secondary outcomes
-
Health Outcome: length of stay in ICU, in hospital, requirement of opioid and sedative agents, duration of extubation process. Safety: haemodynamics and adverse events. Efficacy: sedation and pain scores
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Industry
Registry information
Official study title
A Centre-Randomized, Open-Label, Cross-Over Study to Compare the Pharmaco-Economic Consequences of an Ultiva (Remifentanil Hydrochloride) Based Regimen With Conventional Sedative Based Regimens in ICU Subjects Requiring Short-Term Mechanical Ventilation With Analgesia and Sedation
Important dates
- Study start
- 2004
- First posted
- Sep 12, 2005
- Registry last updated
- Oct 16, 2008
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Dexmedetomidine Versus Ketamine Loading for Dexmedetomidine Sedation During Elective Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia
NCT07676955
Cesarean Birth, Sedation
Istanbul, Sultangazi, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsSedation in ICU Patients With Mechanical Ventilation
NCT06538883
Mechanical Ventilation, Sedation
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
View Trial DetailsSedation With Dexmedetomidine or Midazolam in Combination With Propofol for Removal of Double-J Ureteral Stent
NCT07580768
Dexmedetomidine, Double-J Ureteral Stent
Tanta, El-Gharbia, Egypt
View Trial DetailsInhalational Sedation and Mechanical Power
NCT05559970
ICU, Lung Diseases
Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, Thailand
View Trial Details