Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05224804

Pharmacists' Knowledge and Attitudes About ADRs Reporting and Pharmacovigilance Practice in Egyptian Hospitals

The present study has assessed the knowledge, attitude and practice of ADRs reporting among pharmacists, and the perceived factors that may influence reporting.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

20 year–50 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Marwa Kamal Ahmed Tolba

Al Fayyum, 63111, Egypt

About this study

The practice and science of pharmacovigilance is described as the gathering, identification, monitoring, assessment, and prevention of adverse medication effects using pharmaceutical products. The term "pharmacovigilance" comes from the Greek words pharmakon (drug) and vigilare (vigilance) (monitor or keep an eye on). Pharmacovigilance (PV) is defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as "the science and practices relating to the detection, assessment, understanding, and prevention of adverse effects or other drug-related problems". PV assesses the risk-benefit profile of medicines in order to improve patient safety. As a result, adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting is the bedrock of any PV system, and early detection and reporting of ADRs to regional or national drug-regulatory bodies is important.

ADRs are defined by the World Health Organization as an unpleasant and unexpected response to a medicine that occurs at levels usually employed in man for the prevention, diagnosis, or therapy of disease, or for the alteration of physiological function". Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are major public health issues that have been linked to longer hospital stays and higher therapeutic costs. According to recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational research, the rate of hospital admissions linked to ADRs is between 3-5 percent.

A number of factors have been linked to HCPs, particularly pharmacists, reporting ADRs. Several studies have indicated reasons for not reporting observed ADRs, and pharmacists have been polled to determine the most important facilitators and barriers to spontaneous reporting. The seven deadly sins were coined by Inman and later defined by Lopez-Gonzalez et al., into professional and personal traits, as well as knowledge and attitudes toward reporting. Pharmacists from throughout the world have highlighted a number of barriers to reporting ADRs, including a lack of time, the inability to correlate an adverse event (AE) to a specific medicine, and the absence of readily available reporting forms . It has also emphasized the necessity of educational measures to encourage ADR reporting, such as awareness lectures and workshops.

Egypt joined the WHO International Program for Drug Monitoring in 2001, but no concrete actions were done until 2009, when the Egyptian Pharmacovigilance Center was established (EPVC). Receiving ADR reports, detecting safety signals, sending frequent newsletters with pharmacovigilance (PV)-related updates, and conducting awareness training are only a few of EPVC's responsibilities.

Who can participate

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pharmacist graduates

Exclusion criteria

undergrauate pharmacist

-

Treatment and study plan

knwoledge

Behavioral

Knowledge and Attitudes about ADRs Reporting

Primary outcomes

  1. Pharmacists' Knowledge and Attitudes about ADRs Reporting and Pharmacovigilance Practice in Egyptian Hospitals

    Time frame: 1 year and 4 month to collect data.

    The majority of pharmacists was knowledgeable about pharmacovigilance and had a favourable attitude toward ADR reporting. There are several variables that discourage pharmacists from reporting suspected ADRs, including the belief that there is no advantage to reporting, the presence of administrative barriers, the lack of availability of the ADR reporting form, and the lack of encouragement from hospital administration.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Fayoum University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Feb 4, 2022
Registry last updated
Feb 4, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.