Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00201942

PET Imaging to Determine the Role of PET in the Assessment of Regional Disease in Breast Cancer (PET PREDICT Trial)

The overall goal of this study is to determine how FDG-PET can be incorporated into the assessment of the axilla in the staging and treatment of women with early stage breast cancer.

A multicentre, prospective, diagnostic accuracy study will be conducted evaluating the ability of positronic emission tomography using fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) to detect the presence or absence of axillary lymph node metastases in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients with no clinical evidence of spread of disease beyond the breast.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Patients will have histologic confirmation of invasive breast cancer and will have a FDG-PET scan prior to axillary node assessment. All patients will have a sentinel node biopsy if any sentinel nodes can be located. Patients with a positive sentinel node will have an axillary node dissection. The results of the PET will be compared to the reference standard of histologic examination of all excised (sentinel and non-sentinel) axillary lymph nodes which will be referred to as axillary node assessment. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for PET-FDG will be determined.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Histologic diagnosis of invasive breast cancer,
  • Resectable primary cancer.

Exclusion criteria

  • The diagnosis of invasive breast cancer was made more than 3 months prior to registration,
  • Patient and/or surgeon are not willing to proceed with a SNB or AND after the PET scan is completed,
  • Patient and/or surgeon are not willing to proceed with a level I and II AND if the SNB is positive, if the PET scan shows increased uptake in the ipsilateral axilla, or if the surgeon is still gaining experience in the performance of SNB,
  • SNB or AND has already been done,
  • Chemotherapy has been given or will be given prior to PET scan or SNB or AND,
  • Significant serious concurrent medical problems (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes),
  • Patient is pregnant or lactating,
  • Patient is unable to lie supine and with both arms above their heads for PET scan,
  • Known hypersensitivity to FDG,
  • Clinical evidence of regional nodal metastases (fixed, matted axillary nodes),
  • Clinical evidence of distant metastases.

Treatment and study plan

PET Scan

Procedure

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary outcomes are the sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET in axillary node assessments using axillary node assessment [Sentinel Node Biopsy(SNB) with or without Axillary Node Dissection (AND)] as the reference standard.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patients with positive FDG-PET in non-axillary nodal areas;

  2. Patients with positive FDG-PET in other non-nodal areas;

  3. Patients with positive FDG-PET in the residual breast tissue.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ontario Clinical Oncology Group (OCOG)

Other

Collaborators

  • Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective Study to Determine the Role of 2-[18F]Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose (FDG)Positron Emission Tomography (PET)in the Assessment of Regional Nodal Spread of Disease in Breast Cancer Patients

Important dates

Study start
2005
Study completion
2007
First posted
Sep 20, 2005
Registry last updated
Oct 18, 2007

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.