Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO
Aurora, Colorado, 80045-7211, United States
Location contact
Michelle R Rauzi, DPT
CONTACT
Michelle R Rauzi, DPT
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT07456150
Half of all Veterans who seek care from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) experience chronic musculoskeletal pain. First-line treatment for chronic pain should include nonpharmacological interventions. Although Veterans have access to these interventions, there is no standardized process to personalize them to meet the needs of individual Veterans despite the fact that personalization and self-care are key components of the VHA's Stepped Care Model for pain management. This proposal seeks to adapt and evaluate a coaching intervention that will be a personalized approach to help Veterans develop and maintain pain self-care plans. The proposed research responds to VHA's strategic objectives to tailor service delivery (obj. 2.2) and develop or adapt interventions that improve Veteran outcomes (obj. 2.4).
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Aurora, Colorado, 80045-7211, United States
Michelle R Rauzi, DPT
CONTACT
Michelle R Rauzi, DPT
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The overall purpose of this research is to design and test an intervention that will support Veterans in developing and maintaining a self-care plan for chronic pain. This study will use a multi-stage mixed methods intervention development and optimization design. The first stage (Aim 1) is a convergent mixed methods design that incorporates traditional qualitative, human-centered design, and quantitative methods to discover Veteran and clinician preferences and recommendations for an intervention to support personalization and maintenance of pain self-care plans. The second stage (Aim 2) uses human-centered design methods to engage with multiple key partners (Veterans, clinicians, leadership, etc.) to iterative design the intervention. The final stage (Aim 3) is a convergent mixed-methods design that will test the intervention among Veterans with chronic pain. Aim 3 will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention using a randomized feasibility study with 2 parallel arms (n=15/arm). The primary feasibility outcomes are recruitment and retention; secondary outcomes will evaluate willingness of participants to be randomized, acceptability of the intervention, and changes in Veteran-level outcomes (pain interference, quality of life, etc.).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The intervention will likely incorporate health coaching to support participants in developing and maintaining their pain self-care plans. Details of the intervention will be updated prior to enrollment because the core components may changed based on findings from stages 1 and 2 (aims 1 and 2).
Time frame: Baseline
Recruitment rate is defined as the proportion of Veterans who enroll in the feasibility study out of all those eligible who were asked to participate.
Time frame: 3 Months (primary) and 6 Months
Retention is defined as the proportion of Veterans who complete the intervention (anticipated timeframe of 3 months) and the proportion who complete the post-intervention outcomes (anticipated 3 months) and follow-up outcomes (anticipated 6 months)
Time frame: 3 Months
The Feasibility of Intervention Measure consists of 4 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale from (1) complete disagree to (5) completely agree. Mean scores are reported and can range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater feasibility of the program. Feasibility will be evaluated post-program (anticipated 3 months).
Time frame: 3 Months
The Acceptability of Intervention Measure consists of 4 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale from (1) complete disagree to (5) completely agree. Mean scores are reported and can range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability of the program. Feasibility will be evaluated post-program (anticipated 3 months).
Time frame: 3 Months
The Intervention Appropriateness Measure consists of 4 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale from (1) complete disagree to (5) completely agree. Mean scores are reported and can range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater appropriateness of the program. Feasibility will be evaluated post-program (anticipated 3 months).
Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months
Pain intensity and interference will be measured by the PEG-3 (Pain intensity, interference with Enjoyment of life, and interference with General activity) scale. The PEG-3 is a 3-item measure that is valid for individuals with chronic pain and is sensitive to change. Mean of the three individual item scores are reported and can range from 0 to 10. Lower scores indicated less pain intensity and interference.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Joseph W Frank, MD MPH
CONTACT
Michelle R Rauzi, DPT
CONTACT
VA Office of Research and Development
Fed
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07636980
Abdominal Pain, Abdominal Pain (AP)
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07504094
Anxiety Disorders, Back Pain
Teruel, Aragon, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07451587
Care Coordination, Chronic Non-cancer Pain
Coslada, Madrid, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT05998369
Abdominal Pain, Autonomic Nervous System Diseases
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial Details