Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06270628

Personalized Live-remote Exercise Training for Cancer Survivors

Background

Many people with cancer face ongoing problems from their disease and treatments, like fatigue, reduced physical fitness, feeling anxious or down, and neuropathy. While exercise might help with these problems, most studies did not focus on tailoring exercise to address these specific complaints. Exercise programs under supervision (like with a trainer) seem to work better, but barriers for following such sessions are travel distance and time. Therefore, following an exercise program at home with a trainer guiding via video (live-remote) might be a good solution. But, it is unclear how effective this remote exercise program is for cancer patients.

Goal of the study:

The main goal of this study is to assess the effectiveness of a personalized, live-remote exercise intervention for cancer survivors on quality of life and the patients' main complaint. The four complaints tackled in this study are: 1) fatigue, 2) reduced physical functioning, 3) anxiety and/or depressive symptoms, and 4) neuropathy.

Design of the study

In the LION study, 350 cancer patients will be randomly divided into the exercise group or control group. These patients all have at least one of these complaints: 1) fatigue, 2) reduced physical functioning, 3) anxiety and/or depressive symptoms, and/or 4) neuropathy. Patients cannot participate in the study if they are already very active.

The exercise group will start a 12-week exercise program right away, and the other group will wait for 12 weeks before starting. The exercise program consists of three sessions per week. Two sessions per week include aerobic training and strength training. These sessions will be followed by all patients; and aim to improve fitness and strength. The third session specifically aims at improvement of the main complaint, for example fatigue.

Participants will get an app and a fitness tracker to help them stay on track with their exercises. Furthermore, patients get information on the effects of exercise for cancer patients and why exercise is important for specific complaints.

Measurements

The main outcomes of this study are quality of life and the main side-effect of the patient. Other measurements include all kind of patient reported outcomes (like sleep problems and pain), physical fitness, muscle strength, balance, anthropometrics, and (inflammatory) markers in blood.

Conclusion:

This study investigates if personalized exercises done at home, with video guidance, can make cancer survivors feel better and manage their side effects more effectively.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–100 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University Medical Center Utrecht

Utrecht, Netherlands

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Anne May, Prof.

CONTACT

About this study

SUMMARY

Rationale:

Many cancer patients suffer from long-term treatment-related side-effects like fatigue, low physical functioning, anxiety and/or depressive symptoms, and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). There is convincing evidence on the beneficial effects of general exercise interventions on these side-effects. However, studies to date generally fail to specifically screen for (long-term) side-effects at baseline and tailor the intervention to these specific side-effects, although larger exercise effects are observed in patients with a high symptom burden at baseline (e.g., with higher levels of fatigue). Larger effects of exercise are also observed for supervised exercise compared to unsupervised exercise. However, two of the most common barriers for attending and complying with supervised exercise are travel distance and time. An effective approach might be to provide live-remote supervision for exercise interventions. In this scenario, patients can receive guidance from a certified exercise specialist through a video-conferencing platform such as Zoom, while performing exercises within the comfort of their own homes. Currently, the effectiveness of live-remote exercise in cancer patients has not been established.

Objective:

The primary objective of the LION RCT is to assess the (cost-)effectiveness of a personalized, live-remote exercise intervention for cancer survivors on Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and the participants' main, self-reported side-effect. The four side-effects targeted in this study are: 1) fatigue, 2) perceived low physical functioning in daily life, 3) anxiety and/or depressive symptoms, and 4) CIPN.

Study design:

The LION RCT is a randomized controlled trial with two study arms: an exercise group (12 weeks) and a wait list control group. A super umbrella design will be used, allowing us to evaluate four exercise modalities (i.e., exercise modules based on participants' main side-effect) in a wide variety of cancer survivors.

Study population:

For this study, 350 adult cancer survivors treated with systemic chemotherapy (≥ 12 weeks to 1 year after completion of primary treatment of invasive cancer with curative intent) will be recruited independent of their primary cancer diagnosis. Participants will have reported at least one of the following side-effects: fatigue, low physical functioning in daily life, anxiety and/or depressive symptoms, CIPN. Additionally, participants need to be relatively physically inactive, i.e., perform ≤210 minutes/week of moderate-to-vigorous leisure and sports activities.

Intervention:

The intervention consists of three live-remote exercise sessions per week. Participants randomized to the exercise group receive the intervention after the baseline visit and the wait list control participants after the 12-week follow-up visit. A modular approach will be used to tailor the intervention to each participant's specific main side-effect. Each participant will receive the same base module (twice a week) to address HRQOL and in addition one out of four specific modules (once a week) addressing their individual main side-effect. In addition to the live-remote training, participants will be provided with the LION app and an activity tracker (Fitbit) at the start of the intervention to support exercise beyond the supervised program, during holidays and after the end of the intervention. In addition to exercise, the intervention also has an educational component including information about general effects of exercise for cancer patients and why exercise is important for specific side-effects. We consider the provision of such education as an integral part of adequate exercise programming.

After the intervention period of 12 weeks, we follow the patients until 36 weeks. In this follow-up period, also two sub studies take place:

  • Sensor-based guidance sub study (only control patients from Cologne)
  • Live-remote physical fitness and function testing (in all control patients; all sites)

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

To be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must be:

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Diagnosed with any type of invasive cancer and have received systemic chemotherapy as part of their primary cancer treatment
  • Within the timeframe of 12 weeks to 1 year after the completion of their primary cancer treatment with curative intent. Primary treatment, in this context, includes surgery, radiotherapy, and/or chemotherapy. For patients undergoing endocrine, targeted, or immunotherapy, their treatment must not be scheduled to be discontinued within the next 6 months.
  • No evidence of distant metastatic disease (i.e., no diagnosis of metastatic disease in the regular clinical trajectory)
  • ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status ≤ 2
  • Presence of at least one of the following side-effects: fatigue (measured using EORTC QLQ-C30 fatigue symptom scale, score >39), perceived low physical functioning in daily life (measured using EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning scale, score <83), anxiety or depressive symptoms (measured using PHQ-ADS > 20), and/or CIPN (measured using 2 PRO-CTCAE items, score >0) for patients who received neurotoxic chemotherapy. Cut-off values are based on established thresholds.19-21
  • Access to good quality and stable internet connection to access the live-remote training sessions.
  • Able and willing to perform the exercise program and wear the activity tracker at least one week after T0 and before T2, T4, and T5 measurements and during training and online assessment sessions.
  • Able to read, speak and understand the main country language.

Exclusion criteria

A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

  • Too physically active (i.e., >210 minutes/week of self-reported moderate-to-vigorous or leisure and sports activities; this threshold has also been used in other exercise RCTs, such as PREFERABLE-EFFECT22, and fits activity levels of all participating countries) or participation in an exercise program comparable to the LION exercise program.
  • Following, or planned to follow, a structured psychological intervention during the intervention period, i.e., cognitive behavioral therapy, or unstable on psychotropic medication
  • Participated in the intervention group of an exercise study during cancer treatment
  • Inability to complete the testing or training sessions or any other contraindications for exercise as determined by the treating physician, including:
  • Severe neurologic or cardiac impairment according to ACSM criteria
  • Uncontrolled severe respiratory insufficiency or dependence on oxygen suppletion in rest or during exercise
  • Uncontrolled pain All these exclusion criteria are formulated to ensure safe participation in the LION exercise program
  • Any circumstances that would impede ability to give informed consent or adherence to study requirements as determined by the treating physician
  • More than 1 week not able to attend training sessions during the LION intervention period

Treatment and study plan

Exercise group

Behavioral

Live-remote exercise sessions, personalized to the patients main side-effect

Primary outcomes

  1. Health-Related Quality of Life

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 12

    Measured with the summary scale of the EORTC QLQ-C30; min 0- max 100 points; higher scores mean better quality of life

  2. A standardized symptom score, per patient, based on the individual patient's main side-effect defined at baseline

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 12

    Side-effect 1: Fatigue measured with EORTC QLQ-FA12. According to a standardization procedure the symptom score of all patients will be combined into one symptom score..

  3. A standardized symptom score, per patient, based on the individual patient's main side-effect defined at baseline

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 12

    Side-effect 2: Anxiety and depressive symptoms measured with Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety and Depression Scale (PHQ-ADS). According to a standardization procedure the symptom score of all patients will be combined into one symptom score.

  4. A standardized symptom score, per patient, based on the individual patient's main side-effect defined at baseline

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 12

    Side-effect 3: Physical functioning measured with EORTC QLQ-C30 physical function scale According to a standardization procedure the symptom score of all patients will be combined into one symptom score.

  5. A standardized symptom score, per patient, based on the individual patient's main side-effect defined at baseline

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 12

    Side-effect 4: CPIN measured with EORTC QLQ-CPIN20. According to a standardization procedure the symptom score of all patients will be combined into one symptom score.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Health-related quality of life

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 36

    Domains of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (except summary score)

  2. Fatigue

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 36

    Cancer-Related fatigue measured with the EORTC-FA12

  3. Anxiety and Depression

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 36

    Anxiety and depressive symptoms measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety and Depression Scale (PHQ-ADS)

  4. CIPN_1

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 36

    Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy measured with EORTC QLQ-CIPN-20

  5. CIPN_2

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 36

    2 items of the Patient Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)

  6. Sleep

    Time frame: 0-36 weeks

    Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

  7. Pain prevalence and type

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 36

    EORTC QLQ-SURV100

  8. Cognitive problems

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 36

    Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog)

  9. Work limitations

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 36

    Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ)

  10. Body image

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 36

    Body Image Scale (BIS)

  11. Fear of cancer recurrence

    Time frame: 0-36 weeks

    EORTC QLQ-surv100

  12. Habitual physical activity

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 36

    Modified Godin-Shephard Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire

  13. Aerobic capacity on bike

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 24

    Steep ramp test

  14. Aerobic capacity on step

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 24

    Chester step test

  15. Handgrip strength

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 24

    Handgrip test

  16. Upper body muscle strength

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 24

    Chest press

  17. Lower body muscle strength

    Time frame: 0-24 weeks

    Leg press

  18. Sit to stand test

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 24

    30 sec sit to stand test- function test

  19. Physical function

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 24

    Time Up and Go (TUG) test

  20. Balance

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 24

    Single leg stance test with open and closed eyes

  21. Physical activity

    Time frame: 0-36 weeks

    Measured with an activity tracker (Fitbit)

  22. Blood pressure

    Time frame: 0-24 weeks

    Measured twice with blood pressure device

  23. Resting heart rate

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 24

    Measured with blood pressure device

  24. Weight

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 24

    Weight. in KG

  25. Height

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 24

    Height in cm

  26. Waist circumference

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 24

    Waist circumference in cm

  27. Hip circumference

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 24

    Hip circumference in cm

  28. Body composition

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 24

    Fat mass and fat free mass with bio-impedance - three centers

  29. Inflammatory state

    Time frame: 0-12 weeks

    The specific inflammatory markers (e.g., cytokines, interleukins) will be decided at the time-point of analyses to be able to include factors according to up-to-date insights and use state-of the art platforms; we will for example use the Olink PEA platform (Oncology and Inflammation Array)

  30. Growth factors

    Time frame: 0-12 weeks

    The specific growth factors will be decided at the time-point of analyses to be able to include factors according to up-to-date insights and use state-of the art platforms ; we will for example use the Olink PEA platform (Oncology and Inflammation Array)

  31. CRP

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 12

    Blood cell count

  32. Hemoglobin

    Time frame: 0-12 weeks

    Blood cell count

  33. Leucocyte counts

    Time frame: 0-12 weeks

    Blood cell count

  34. Quality-adjusted life years

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 36

    EuroQol-5D-5L

  35. Health-care, patient and family costs

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 36

    Modified Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ)

  36. Productivity losses

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 36

    Modified Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ)

  37. Exercise-related (serious) adverse events

    Time frame: Week 0 - Week 36

    Via CASTOR app before and after each session; asked at and at the study visits.

Other outcomes

  1. Participants experience of sensor-based guidance

    Time frame: Week 12- Week 24

    Questionnaires - substudy control patients Cologne

  2. Trainer experience of sensor-based guidance

    Time frame: Week 12- Week 24

    Questionnaires - substudy control patients Cologne

  3. Compliance sensor-based guidance

    Time frame: Week 12- Week 24

    % of sessions that patients wear the sensor - substudy control patients Cologne

  4. Technical feasibility of sensor-based guidance

    Time frame: Week 12- Week 24

    % of successful live transfer of sensor data - substudy control patients Cologne

  5. Aerobic capacity

    Time frame: Week 12- Week 24

    Chester Step test - substudy live-remote testing

  6. Upper body muscle strength

    Time frame: Week 12- Week 24

    Push-up test - substudy live-remote testing

  7. Lower body muscle strength

    Time frame: Week 12- Week 24

    30 sec sit-to stand test - substudy live-remote testing

  8. Core muscle strength

    Time frame: Week 12- Week 24

    Plank position holding time - substudy live-remote testing

  9. Physical functioning

    Time frame: Week 12- Week 24

    Time Up and Go (TUG) test - substudy live-remote testing

  10. Balance

    Time frame: Week 12- Week 24

    Single leg stance test with open and closed eyes - substudy live-remote testing

  11. Socio-demographics

    Time frame: baseline

    Self-designed questionnaire

  12. Self-efficacy

    Time frame: baseline

    General Self-Efficacy Scale

  13. Social Support

    Time frame: baseline

    Index of Sojourner Social Support (ISSS)

  14. Medical history

    Time frame: baseline

    Interview

  15. Concomitant diseases

    Time frame: Week 0- Week 36

    Interview

  16. Cancer + concomitant medication

    Time frame: Week 0- Week 36

    Interview

  17. Cancer characteristics

    Time frame: baseline

    Interview

  18. Cancer treatment history

    Time frame: baseline

    Interview

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Anne May, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+3161118187

Evelyn Monninkhof, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+3161118187

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

UMC Utrecht

Other

Collaborators

  • Associação de Investigação e Cuidados de Suporte em Oncologia (AISCO), Nova de Gaia, Portugal
  • Cabrini Health (CAB), Malvern, Australia
  • Fundacion Onkologikao (ONK), San Sebastian, Spain
  • German Cancer Research Center
  • German Sport University, Cologne
  • Heidelberg University Clinic and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Karolinska Institute (KI), Stockholm, Sweden
  • The Netherlands Cancer Institute

Registry information

Official study title

Demonstrating the (Cost-)Effectiveness of a Personalized Live-remote Exercise Intervention for Cancer Survivors Using a Super Umbrella Randomized Controlled Trial: the LION RCT

Acronym: LION

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2027
First posted
Feb 21, 2024
Registry last updated
May 11, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.