Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03391115

Personalized Experiences to Inform Improved Communication for Minorities With Life Limiting Illness

The purpose of this research is to develop patient-centered palliative care interventions to improve patient-provider communication and Quality of Life (QoL) of ethnic and racial minority patients living with life-limiting illnesses. Eliciting personal experiences is an effective way for patients to communicate their cultural values and beliefs. This study will assess how to integrate the patients' personal experience narratives into the electronic health record (EHR). The primary hypothesis is that the implementation of a patient-centered intervention to elicit personal experiences that are included in the EHR will improve patient-provider communication and patients' QoL.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

COPD Behavior Cancer Cardiovascular Diseases Chronic Disease Communication Disease Attributes Heart Diseases Heart Failure Lung Diseases Lung Diseases, Obstructive Narration Neoplasms Pathologic Processes Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive Respiratory Tract Diseases

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

University of Colorado Hospital

Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States

About this study

Racial and ethnic minority patients with a Life Limiting Illnes (LLI) in the United States are underserved in many ways, including quality of palliative care. Specific disparities have been reported in palliative care for minority patients, including sub-optimal patient-provider communication and resulting lower QoL. A potential approach to improve communication is to elicit patients' personal narratives that address their cultural or spiritual values and beliefs, and include them in the EHR. The objective of this observational study is to assess the feasibility and efficacy of a palliative care nursing intervention designed to 1) identify barriers and facilitators for eliciting and recording relevant narratives from the perspectives of the key stakeholders: minority patients with LLI; 2) to conduct usability testing, applying a user-system-environment evaluation process to determine essential requirements for integration of the patient-centered narratives into the EHR; and 3) identify barriers and facilitators of integration of the patient's narrative into daily workflow from the perspectives of key stakeholders: acute care bedside nurse.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Patients

  • 18 years of age or older
  • able to read English
  • capable of giving informed consent
  • self-identifying as part of a racial or ethnic minority
  • diagnosed with at least one LLI. The operational definition of LLI eligible for this study includes the following diagnoses:
  • metastatic solid cancer or inoperable lung cancer;
  • COPD with FEV1 values < 35% predicted or oxygen dependence;
  • New York Heart Association Class III or IV heart failure (CHF).

Inclusion criteria

Nurse

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Confirm verbally that they were involved in the care of a patient who is participating in the storytelling intervention

Treatment and study plan

Storytelling Intervention for Patient Participants

Behavioral

The storytelling intervention consists of an audio-recorded interview with each patient participant prompted the participant to share their story with questions such as: tell me about your illness, tell me how your illness has affected your emotions, relationships, and spirituality. The interview transcripts will be used to co-create a 1 page patient story using these criteria:1) written in the first person; 2) nonjudgmental; 3) captures the participant's voice; 4) accurately reflects content of the interview; and 5) non-labeling. Once the story has been approved by the participant, I will upload it to the EHR.

Storytelling Intervention for Nurse Participants

Behavioral

Once the patient's story is uploaded to the EHR, automatic alerts will be sent to the participant's EHR-assigned nurses. For usability testing, nurse participants will 1) provide content expertise of the workflow processes, and 2) put the storytelling intervention through in-house usability testing to check the "strength" of EHR features and user-friendliness. Data will be collected with exit interviews and completion of a questionnaire: the System Usability Scale which asks them to rank their satisfaction with specific elements such as: how the story is labeled and presented in the EHR, any technical navigation EHR difficulties, and use of the material.

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Completed Exit Interviews From Patients on Feasibility of Their Use of Their Narrative Integrated Into EHR

    Time frame: 1-2 weeks

    Using an observational design, this measure (exit interviews) were completed with 20 inpatient participants and 18 nurse participants. The qualitative data from the interviews were used to define and refine the storytelling intervention. The data collected from the exit interview is qualitative in nature and therefore does not have a numerical value.

Other outcomes

  1. Usability Assessment Via the System Usability Scale(SUS), Range of 0 to 100, With Higher Number Representing a Better Outcome SUS Scores Have a Range of 0 to 100, the Higher the Number Represents a Better Outcome.

    Time frame: 1-2 weeks

    This study will utilize an observational design to define and refine the storytelling intervention, seeking input from the key stakeholders: providers (acute care bedside nurses).The SUS scale is a 10 item Likert scale which gives a global view of subjective assessment of usability with five item responses options from strongly agree to strongly disagree. SUS yields a single number representing a composite measure of the overall usability of the system being studied. Note that scores for individual items are not meaningful on their own. To calculate the SUS score, first sum the score contributions from each item. Each item's score contribution will range from 0 to 4. For items 1,3,5,7, and 9, the score contribution is the scale position minus 1. For items 2,4,6,8, and 10, the contribution is 5 minus the scale position. Multiply the sum of the scores by 2.5 to obtain the overall value of the SUS, with the higher the number, the better the outcome.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Colorado, Denver

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Jan 5, 2018
Registry last updated
Feb 18, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.