Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Beijing, China
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT05504265
This study was designed to compare analgesic efficacy and safety of different perioperative analgesic modes in minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Beijing, China
Location status: Recruiting
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
50mg once,30min before induction anesthesia
50mg bid
Sufentanil 2.5 μg/kg+ondansetron 8mg, prepared to 100ml normal saline; background dose: 2 ml/h, single press analgesic pump injection volume: 0.5 ml, locking time: 15 min.
Time frame: 4 hours after surgery
In the Visual Analog Score to be used as the pain measurement criterion, '0' is the minimum value that indicates no pain, while '10' is the maximum value that defines the most severe pain.
Time frame: 12 hours after surgery
In the Visual Analog Score to be used as the pain measurement criterion, '0' is the minimum value that indicates no pain, while '10' is the maximum value that defines the most severe pain.
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
In the Visual Analog Score to be used as the pain measurement criterion, '0' is the minimum value that indicates no pain, while '10' is the maximum value that defines the most severe pain.
Time frame: 36 hours after surgery
In the Visual Analog Score to be used as the pain measurement criterion, '0' is the minimum value that indicates no pain, while '10' is the maximum value that defines the most severe pain.
Time frame: 48 hours after surgery
In the Visual Analog Score to be used as the pain measurement criterion, '0' is the minimum value that indicates no pain, while '10' is the maximum value that defines the most severe pain.
Time frame: 60 hours after surgery
In the Visual Analog Score to be used as the pain measurement criterion, '0' is the minimum value that indicates no pain, while '10' is the maximum value that defines the most severe pain.
Time frame: 72 hours after surgery
In the Visual Analog Score to be used as the pain measurement criterion, '0' is the minimum value that indicates no pain, while '10' is the maximum value that defines the most severe pain.
Time frame: Up to 14 days after surgery
Time from the end of surgery to the first flatus.
Time frame: Up to 14 days after surgery
Time from the end of surgery to the first defaecation.
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
Abdominal distension was measured using a scoring system, '0' is the minimum value that indicates no abdominal distension, while '10' is the maximum value that defines the most severe abdominal distension.
Time frame: 48 hours after surgery
Abdominal distension was measured using a scoring system, '0' is the minimum value that indicates no abdominal distension, while '10' is the maximum value that defines the most severe abdominal distension.
Time frame: 72 hours after surgery
Abdominal distension was measured using a scoring system, '0' is the minimum value that indicates no abdominal distension, while '10' is the maximum value that defines the most severe abdominal distension.
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
Nausea and vomiting were measured using a scoring system(0 = no nausea, 1 = only nausea, 2 = both nausea and vomiting).
Time frame: 48 hours after surgery
Nausea and vomiting were measured using a scoring system(0 = no nausea, 1 = only nausea, 2 = both nausea and vomiting).
Time frame: 72 hours after surgery
Nausea and vomiting were measured using a scoring system(0 = no nausea, 1 = only nausea, 2 = both nausea and vomiting).
Time frame: Up to 14 days after surgery
Time from the end of surgery to the first postoperative ambulation
Time frame: Up to 60 days after surgery
Time from the end of surgery to discharge from the hospital
Time frame: Up to 30 days after surgery
Rate of pulmonary infection up to 30 days after surgery
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Other
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Different Analgesic Modes in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06906887
Digestive System Diseases, Digestive System Neoplasms
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06465069
Adnexal Diseases, Advanced Solid Tumor
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06445972
Digestive System Diseases, Digestive System Neoplasms
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06910657
Adenocarcinoma, Adnexal Diseases
St Louis, Missouri, United States
View Trial Details