Ospedale degli Infermi
Biella, Italy
NCT Number: NCT06092541
This research will have the aim of evaluating and comparing the effectiveness of two methods (analgesia with nitrous oxide and pericervical analgesia, excluding the use of paracervical block due to the increased risk of complications reported in the literature in the control of pain caused during Outpatient Operative Hysteroscopy maneuvers with Miniresector.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me25 year–50 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Biella, Italy
Pain is the primary cause of hysteroscopy failure. It can be attributed to multiple causes, such as manipulation of the cervical canal , uterine distention due to the liquid distension media used during the procedure , operating procedures on the endometrium (as a possible cause of uterine contraction) , until the release of prostaglandins following manipulation of the cervix and uterine distension.
There are few studies in the literature that have compared the various methods of pain control during the hysteroscopic examination. Among these, Ahmad et al., for example, compared the use of the paracervical block and inhalation anesthesia during hysteroscopy: although both proved to be effective in controlling pain, the paracervical block was associated with a greater number of complications. More recently, Solano et al. they defined how the administration of nitrous oxide was equally effective (but with many more advantages) to the paracervical block with 1% lidocaine in controlling pain during hysteroscopy performed using the Bettocchi hysteroscope.
However, for the purposes of this research it is important to take two aspects into consideration:
Objective This clinical trial will have the aim of evaluating and comparing the effectiveness of two methods (analgesia with nitrous oxide and pericervical analgesia, excluding the use of paracervical block due to the increased risk of complications reported in the literature1) in the control of pain caused during Outpatient Operative Hysteroscopy maneuvers with Miniresector.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients assigned to the Intervention Group will receive Pericervical anesthesia before performing Hysteroscopy.
Specifically, for the administration of pericervical analgesia, Mepivacaine/Lidocaine 1.5% 10/15 ml (max dose 7 mg/kg) will be used and pericervical infiltration will be performed at 0.5 cm depth at 3 and 9 hours.
Other names: Pericervical Anesthesia
Patients assigned to the Control Group will receive Nitrous Oxide anesthesia before hysteroscopy
Other names: N2O2 Anesthesia
Time frame: 6 months
Change From Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale -VAS- using Pericervical Analgesia versus Analgesia with Nitrous Oxide in outpatient hysteroscopic surgery with Miniresector
Ospedale degli Infermi di Biella
Other
Comparison of Efficacy Between Nitrous Oxide (n2o) Analgesia and Pericervical Analgesia in Outpatient Operative Hysteroscopy With Miniresector: a Randomized Clinical Pilot Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05514236
Agnosia, Hysteroscopy
Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT02863679
Agnosia, Hysteroscopy
Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07713134
Analgeisa, Hysteroscopy
Tangshan, Hebei, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07641595
Cervical Preparation, Evening Primorose Oil
Sohag, Egypt
View Trial Details