Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04426045

Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block Versus Supra-inguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Pain Management After Total Hip Arthroplasty: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Adequate pain control after total hip arthroplasty is crucial for early ambulation and patient satisfaction. The supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block has been described as a promising technique for primary total hip arthroplasty. However, one of the concerns with supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block is still the potential for quadriceps weakness that might delay ambulation. The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block has been recently introduced a new technique for blockade of the articular branches of the femoral, obturator and accessory obturator nerves. PENG block is possible to provide sufficient analgesia and preserve lower limb muscle strength. The investigators will compare ultrasound-guided supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block with PENG block in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

19 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine

Seoul, South Korea

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 19 years old or older, with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status 1-3
  • scheduled for elective unilateral total hip arthroplasty

Exclusion criteria

  • Allergy or intolerance to any of the drugs used in the study
  • Hepatic or renal insufficiency
  • Opioid dependency
  • Coagulopathy
  • Pre-existing neurologic or anatomic deficits in the lower extremities
  • Severe psychiatric illness

Treatment and study plan

pericapsular nerve group block

Procedure

A curvilinear 2-5MHz ultrasound probe will be initially placed in a transverse plane over the anterior superior iliac spine and then aligned with the pubic ramus by rotating the probe counterclockwise approximately 45 degrees. In this view, the iliopubic eminence, the iliopsoas muscle and tendon, the femoral artery, and pectineus muscle will be observed. A 22-gauge, 80-mm needle will be inserted from lateral to medial in an in-plane approach to place the tip in the musculofascial plane between the psoas tendon anteriorly and the pubic ramus posteriorly. A total volume of 20 ml of ropivacaine 0.2% will be injected.

Other names: PENG block

Supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block

Procedure

A linear 6-13-MHz ultrasound probe will be placed in the sagittal plane to obtain an image of the anterior superior iliac spine. The fascia iliaca and sartorius, iliopsoas, and oblique internal muscles will be identified by sliding the probe medially. After identifying the "bow-tie sign" formed by the muscle fascias, a 22-gauge, 80-mm needle will be introduced 1 cm cephalad to the inguinal ligament. Using an in-plane approach, the fascia iliaca will be penetrated and hydrodissected, separating the fascia iliaca from the iliac muscle. A total volume of 30 ml of ropivacaine 0.2% will be injected.

Other names: Supra-inguinal FICB

Primary outcomes

  1. Numeric rating scale pain score

    Time frame: 1 hour after the surgery

    Pain intensity at rest and during 45-degree passive flexion of the hip with the ipsilateral knee flexed naturally will be evaluated by an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS: 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)

  2. Numeric rating scale pain score

    Time frame: 6 hours after the surgery

    Pain intensity at rest and during 45-degree passive flexion of the hip with the ipsilateral knee flexed naturally will be evaluated by an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS: 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)

  3. Numeric rating scale pain score

    Time frame: 24 hours after the surgery

    Pain intensity at rest and during 45-degree passive flexion of the hip with the ipsilateral knee flexed naturally will be evaluated by an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS: 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)

  4. Numeric rating scale pain score

    Time frame: 36 hours after the surgery

    Pain intensity at rest and during 45-degree passive flexion of the hip with the ipsilateral knee flexed naturally will be evaluated by an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS: 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)

  5. Numeric rating scale pain score

    Time frame: 48 hours after the surgery

    Pain intensity at rest and during 45-degree passive flexion of the hip with the ipsilateral knee flexed naturally will be evaluated by an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS: 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quadriceps muscle strength

    Time frame: baseline

    Quadriceps muscle strength will be measured by the dynamometer

  2. Quadriceps muscle strength

    Time frame: at 6 hours postoperatively

    Quadriceps muscle strength will be measured by the dynamometer

  3. Quadriceps muscle strength

    Time frame: at 24 hours postoperatively

    Quadriceps muscle strength will be measured by the dynamometer

  4. Quadriceps muscle strength

    Time frame: at 36 hours postoperatively

    Quadriceps muscle strength will be measured by the dynamometer

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Yonsei University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Jun 11, 2020
Registry last updated
Jul 20, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.