Hippocration General Hospital
Athens, 11527, Greece
NCT Number: NCT04288661
Gastric cancer ranks as the fifth most common and fifth most lethal cancer globally. For patients with AJCC stages IB to IIIC, representing the majority of cases, the current gold standard of surgical treatment involves total gastrectomy combined with D2 lymph node dissection, followed by gastrointestinal tract reconstruction .It has long been established that minimizing surgical intervention correlates with faster patient recovery. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines provide globally recognized perioperative recommendations for a variety of surgical procedures, grounded in research, audits, and evidence-based practice. In 2014, Mortensen et al. introduced ERAS guidelines specifically tailored for gastrectomy in gastric cancer. These guidelines include both procedure-specific and general recommendations applicable to the perioperative management of abdominal surgeries.Since the publication of ERAS guidelines, evidence suggests limited and inconsistent global adherence to the protocol for gastrectomy, particularly regarding surgical drain use.Drains remain in use for gastrectomy, particularly in the East, where ongoing studies explore the prognostic value of drain contents post-gastrectomy without reaching consensus. Western adherence to ERAS recommendations on drains is similarly low.This prospective, non-randomized controlled clinical trial aims to assess the impact of one perianastomotic drain when it is placed under specific, predefined criteria. The trial evaluates the immediate and short-term postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent D2 total gastrectomy for gastric cancer which were performed in a high-volume centre and under the care of a highly experienced team
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Athens, 11527, Greece
The DRAG (DRains After Gastrectomy) Trial is a prospective, non-randomized, controlled clinical trial involving patients diagnosed with gastric neoplasm. All surgeries were performed by a single, highly experienced surgeon in the 1st Propaedeutic Surgery Department at Hippocration General Hospital in Athens, Greece. The patients underwent open total gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection, followed by Roux-en-Y gastrointestinal tract reconstruction, in accordance with a predefined, ERAS-compliant perioperative departmental protocol. Our institution's protocol does not routinely incorporate exploratory laparoscopy or peritoneal cytology.
The participants were divided into two groups. The first group followed the department's standard practice, with a drain placed near the esophagojejunal anastomosis (drain group). In contrast, the second did not have a drain placed (non-drain group). The decision to place a drain was based on the following criteria:
The statistical analysis was performed using the R software (R foundation for Statistical Computing) version 4.3.0 for Windows. Descriptive characteristics for the quantitative data were expressed as median and Quartile 1 (Q1) to Quartile 3 (Q3) range and for completeness reasons the mean ± standard deviation (SD), for the qualitative data was reported the frequency of occurrence and the relevant percentage. Comparisons were preformed between patients with drainage and those without drainage; for the qualitative parameters statistical tests were performed via the chi-square test (and if required a Fisher exact test) and for the arithmetic data (as normality was not possible to be ensured using the Shapiro Wilk test), were applied not parametric tests, specifically the Mann Whitney U test. The significance level (p-value) was set to 0.05, thus statistically significant difference between compared groups was for p<0.05 and all tests were two sided.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The need of perianastomotic drain placement after Roux-en-Y reconstruction in total gastrectomy operations is investigated. As intervention, no drain placement is considered, according to the criteria stated above
Time frame: Hospital stay, an average of 5 days
Postoperative pain levels will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). VAS scores will be recorded during the patient's hospital stay following total gastrectomy. For analysis, pain intensity will be categorized into two groups:
High pain: VAS score greater than 5
Not high pain: VAS score 5 or less
This binary classification will be used to compare postoperative pain outcomes between patients with and without anastomotic drain placement, helping to evaluate whether drain usage is associated with increased postoperative pain.
Time frame: Hospital stay, an average of 5 days
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is considered an immediate effect of the perianastomotic drain. Measured as present or absent, with presence meaning worse results
Time frame: Hospital stay, an average of 5 days
immediate outcome of perianastomic drain placement. Feeding is considered delayed if started after the 3rd day as per our protocol
Time frame: Hospital stay, an average of 5 days
immediate postoperative effect of drain placement. Mobilization is considered delayed if the patient does not manage to achieve the milestones as per our(and ERAS)protocol.
Time frame: Hospital stay, an average of 5 days
immediate effect of drain placement
Time frame: Hospital stay approx 5 days
immediate effect of drain placement. If there is no mobilization of bowel (flatus or motion) within the first 3 days, it is considered delay of the bowel movement
Time frame: 30 days
short term effect of drain placement
Time frame: 30 days
short term effect of drain placement
Time frame: 30 days
short term effect of drain placement
THEODOROU DIMITRIOS
Other
The Drain Debate: Reevaluating Prophylactic Drains in Total Gastrectomy- A Controlled Trial on the Use of Prophylactic Drains in Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
Acronym: DRAG
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00183898
Digestive System Diseases, Digestive System Neoplasms
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00342654
Digestive System Diseases, Digestive System Neoplasms
Beijing, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05396300
Colonic Diseases, Colorectal Cancer
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05538195
Colon Cancer, Colonic Diseases
Henan, China
View Trial Details