augmentation procedure with Bio-Oss® and Bio-Gide®
Devicesoft tissue management using GBR procedure
NCT Number: NCT02513368
The aim of the present study was to propose the employment of Bio-Oss® and Bio-Gide® at implant site in order to evaluate if the increased bucco-lingual bone thickness could enhance the stability of peri implant soft tissue, when compared to the grafting technique ( bilaminar technique), performed in association with implant placement .
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Siena University, Department of Periodontology, Policlinico Le Scotte Siena., Siena, Italy
With respect to the soft tissue management many surgical approaches have been described in order to increase soft tissue volume and keratinized tissue height at implant site: roll flaps, connective tissue graft , epithelial connective tissue graft. In recent years, soft tissue substitutes , such as acellular dermal matrix or collagen matrix have been proposed to increase the dimensions of peri implant soft tissues; however, further studies have demonstrated that the allograft materials were less effective and less predictable than autogenous soft tissue grafts, in terms of increasing attached keratinized tissue , due to the considerable shrinkage and inconsistent quality of the attached tissue gained ; consequently soft tissue graft from the palate are currently considered the gold standard for augmenting peri implant soft. Some clinical studies proposed the association of contour augmentation by guided bone regeneration (GBR) with implant placement. The aim of these procedures is to restore the missing volume and to establish a facial bone wall of sufficient height and thickness to serve as a support for peri implant soft tissues; in these terms, GBR could be considered important to increase the stability of peri implant soft tissue , preventing the marginal soft tissue shrinkage and the following exposition of implant . This could be a valid approach to stabilize coronal peri implant soft tissue and at the same time less traumatic than grafting procedures.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
soft tissue management using GBR procedure
soft tissue management using the bilaminar technique
Time frame: one month and one year after the placement of the definitive crowns
Buccal mucosa thickness was assessed with a calibrated endodontic file, 2 mm apical to the bone crest
Time frame: one month and one year after the placement of the definitive crowns
Time frame: one month and one year after the placement of the definitive crowns
University of Firenze and Siena, Napoli, Italy
Other
Peri Implant Soft Tissue Healing in Single Implant Restoration Using the Guided Bone Regeneration Technique Ore a Connective Tissue Graft
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06238154
Drug Effect, Drug Use
Van, Merkez, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04865952
Hyaluronic Acid, Oral Soft Tissue Conditions
Roma, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT04918563
Aneurysm, Cardiovascular Diseases
Budapest, Hungary
View Trial DetailsNCT04276129
Chlorhexidine Adverse Reaction, Oral Soft Tissue Conditions
Roma, Italy
View Trial Details