Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01011192

Performance of Two Different ke0s in the Same Pharmacokinetic Propofol Model

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical performance of two different ke0s (fast and slow) in terms of propofol effect-site concentration (Ce) during the loss and recovery of consciousness, using Marsh's pharmacokinetic model.The hypothesis to be tested was that the Ce of propofol predicted by the slow ke0 in the loss and recovery of consciousness is similar, differently from the fast ke0.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

20 year–45 year

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Hospital Santa Sofia

Campinas, São Paulo, 13013161, Brazil

About this study

Introduction: The ke0 can be defined as the proportional variation of the gradient of concentration between the plasma and the effect-site in relation to the unit of time. Theoretically, the higher the value of the ke0, the faster the drug enters the effect-site. Therefore, drugs with short T½ke0 have high ke0s and fast onset of action. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical performance of two different ke0s (fast and slow) in terms of propofol effect-site concentration (Ce) during the loss and recovery of consciousness, using Marsh's pharmacokinetic model. Method: Twenty healthy male adult volunteers participated in this study. Propofol was first administered to the individual volunteer using Marsh's pharmacokinetic target-controlled infusion model with ke0 of 1.21 min-1 and, on another opportunity, with the same pharmacokinetic model but ke0 of 0.26 min-1. Propofol was infused in plasma target-concentration of 3.0 µg.mL-1. Loss and recovery of consciousness was defined as response of the volunteer to verbal stimulus. The Ce was registered at the moments of loss and recovery of consciousness. Results: At loss and recovery of consciousness, propofol Ce means predicted by the fast ke0 were different (3.64 ± 0.78 and 1.47 ± 0.29 µg.mL-1, respectively, p < 0.0001), whereas with the slow ke0 the predicted Ce means were similar (2.20 ± 0.70 and 2.13 ± 0.43 µg.mL-1, respectively, p = 0.5425). Conclusion: It can be concluded that slow ke0 (0.26 min-1) incorporated into Marsh's pharmacokinetic model showed better clinical performance than fast ke0 (1.21 min-1), since the predicted effect-site concentrations of propofol at loss and recovery of consciousness were similar.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • healthy
  • male
  • adult between 20 and 45 years old

Exclusion criteria

  • use of alcohol or illicit drugs
  • chronic use of H2 inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants of calcium channel blockers
  • hypersensitivity to the drugs used in the experimental protocol.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Propofol effect-site concentration (Ce) during the loss and recovery of consciousness with fast and slow keo.

    Time frame: 20 minutes

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centro Medico Campinas

Other

Collaborators

  • Hospital Santa Sofia Ltda

Registry information

Official study title

Performance of Two Different Ke0s in the Same Pharmacokinetic Propofol Model. Study on Loss and Recovery of Consciousness

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2009
First posted
Nov 11, 2009
Registry last updated
Nov 13, 2009

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.