Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01171066

Performance of the Tasman Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) System

Assessment of the performance of the Tasman CPAP system in treating obstructive sleep apnea. The purpose of this study is to (1) evaluate the performance of this system in the efficacy of the treatment in comparison to S8 Escape, and (2) to evaluate the performance of the Tasman device via subjective assessment of comfort and ease of breathing compared to the participant's current CPAP device.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

ResMed Ltd

Sydney, New South Wales, 2155, Australia

About this study

Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) is a condition characterised by partial or complete collapse of the upper airway during sleep. The treatment of choice for OSA is Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP). CPAP acts as a positive airway splint, delivering a fixed positive airway pressure to the upper airway via a tube and mask. The mask is attached to the participant's nose via head straps. The type of mask used is dependent upon participant choice and comfort and the mask that provides the best fit.

Some participants stop using CPAP therapy finding it difficult to tolerate due to leak issues or discomfort from their nasal mask. Another frequent concern is mask dislodgment while sleeping causing leaks and consequently waking the patient up.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of the Tasman CPAP system via objective and subjective assessment of comfort and ease of breathing compared to the participant's current CPAP device.

Aim

  • To determine if the efficacy of the treatment is clinically equivalent to or better than the predicate device (S8 Escape)
  • To evaluate the performance of the Tasman CPAP system in terms of comfort of breathing and general ease of use

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients willing to give written informed consent
  • Patients who can read and comprehend English
  • Patients being treated for OSA for >6 months
  • Patients using a ResMed nasal mask system
  • Patients who can trial the trial mask for 7 nights

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients not willing to give written informed consent
  • Patients who can not read and comprehend English
  • Patients being treated for OSA for <6 months
  • Patients using an inappropriate mask system
  • Patients using Bilevel flow generators
  • Patients who are not using CPAP between 7 and 13 cmH2O
  • Patients who are pregnant
  • Patients who cannot trial the trial mask for 7 nights
  • Patients with a hearing impairment

Treatment and study plan

Tasman CPAP system

Device

Participants will trial the Tasman CPAP system for a duration of 1 week in place of their current CPAP system.

Other names: ResMed Tasman

Primary outcomes

  1. To determine if the efficacy of the treatment is clinically equivalent to or better than the predicate device (S8 Escape)

    Time frame: 1 week

Secondary outcomes

  1. To assess the usability of the Tasman CPAP system

    Time frame: 1 week

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

ResMed

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Assessment of the Performance of the Tasman CPAP System in Treating Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Jul 28, 2010
Registry last updated
Feb 4, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.