Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00372190

Performance of Tension Free Vaginal Mesh (Prolift) Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery in Recurrent Prolapse.

Pelvic organ prolapse is a common problem. A lot of women have surgery for prolapse. The recurrence rate op pelvic organ prolapse after surgical treatment is high. Placement of a mesh aims at reducing the recurrence rate, but mesh implants can cause complications.

This study is designed to determine the effectiveness of one type of mesh (tensionfree vaginal mesh; Prolift), compared with the standard prolapse surgery. A secondary objective is to track the complications of both procedures.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Gelre ziekenhuizen, Apeldoorn, Netherlands

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Patients with recurrent prolapse after surgery can participate in this study. A total of 194 women will be included. At random 97 patients undergo a standard prolapse operation and 97 patients undergo an operation with the mesh. Evaluation will take place during surgery, at the postoperative visit after six weeks, and after six months and twelve months. Quality of life, degree of vaginal prolapse, subjective effectiveness, safety and incidence of complications will be evaluated.

An amendment to the original study has been approved by the Ethical Committee to examine long term outcome of this RCT at 7 years. This study was completed in december 2015.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • recurrent anterior and/or posterior prolapse POP-Q stage 2 or more
  • patient has agreed to undergo implantation of TVM (prolift) or fascial plication
  • patient is willing to return for follow-up evaluation at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months
  • patient is willing to complete quality of life questionnaires at 6 and 12 months

Exclusion criteria

  • patient is or wants to become pregnant
  • patient has had previous synthetic mesh procedure (a previous mid-urethral sling procedure is NOT an exclusion criterion)
  • patient has current urinary tract or vaginal infections
  • patient has a blood coagulation disorder
  • patient has a compromised immune system or any other condition that would compromise healing
  • patient has renal insufficiency and/or upper urinary tract obstruction
  • patient is unwilling or unable to return for evaluation
  • patient has had previous irradiation
  • patient has any malignancy
  • patient has large ovarian cysts of large myoma

Treatment and study plan

Tensionfree vaginal mesh kit (Prolift)

Device

Insertion of a tension free vaginal mesh using a Prolift mesh kit

Other names: Prolift mesh

classic vaginal prolapse surgery (fascia plication)

Procedure

classic vaginal prolapse surgery (fascia plication) to correct Pelvic Organ prolapse

Other names: Conventional

Primary outcomes

  1. Prolapse by "Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System" (POP-Q), at 12 Months

    Time frame: 12 months

    Number of participants with anatomic failures defined as "Pelvic Organ Prolapse" (POP) stage II or higher

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mesh Exposure at 12 Months

    Time frame: 12 months

    cumulative number of patients with mesh exposure at 12 months (if diagnosed at 6 weeks or 6 months and treated, the exposure is calculated at 12 months, even if the exposure was not there anymore)

  2. "Patient Global Impression of Improvement" (PGI-I) at 12 Months

    Time frame: at 12 months

    Number of participants with much to very much improvement compared to baseline

  3. Bulge Symptoms

    Time frame: 12 months

    Bulge symptoms defined as Prolapse domain score of the "Urogenital Distress Inventory" (UDI) at 12 months.

    Scores range from 0 (least/no bother) to 100 (maximum bother)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Radboud University Medical Center

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective and Comparative Study of the Performance of Tension Free Vaginal Mesh (Prolift) Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery in Recurrent Prolapse

Important dates

Study start
2006
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2015
First posted
Sep 6, 2006
Registry last updated
Jul 3, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.